Love these. My single yet significant complaint is the gender dynamics and roles. I like that the books are written as if they are old fashioned because there are no electronics. I was surprised to see they were published around 2010 rather than 1910 (though a cellphone is mentioned very briefly in one of the other books, so there are a few slips that show you they are actually in current times) but and I am mystified as to why the author and the editor/publisher decided to push 100 year old gender stereotypes in these modern children's books. I had to modify text on the fly to make sure my 4 year old son didn't get harmful gender messaging from the books, though it wasn't very hard to do and I'm sure many of us are used to doing it with older books already and very young children. I could explain it to him if he were older but right now it goes over his head so I have to modify the words. It's a mix for sure: Mrs. Nutmouse is proactive and has a lot of good ideas to solve problems. But there's just little pointless things sprinkled throughout the book that shouldn't be there in 2010. Here are some:
Mrs. Nutmouse is excessively described slaving over domestic chores (which are depicted as her life's passion) from dawn to dusk while Mr. Nutmouse sleeps in, sits at the table and eats food she puts down in front of him, then spends all day in the library reading and napping while she cleans the house frenetically and spends hours preparing him elaborate meals. The books present this as just how things are. When they help the children, Mrs. Nutmouse exclusively does all female gendered work (cleaning, sewing) while Mr. Nutmouse (if he bothers to come along at all) exclusively does male gendered work (repairing broken things with tools). Male characters will think things about women characters like that they aren't smart enough to have good ideas, aren't strong enough to do physical tasks, etc., and this is not always contradicted later in a way that would make it clear to children that it's not true. Often these internal dialogues are from male characters who are depicted as bad or buffoons and it could be the author means them to be subtly understood to be incorrect by readers, but my kid is too young to get that if so. Additionally, the author sometimes describes events as "Mr. Nutmouse and his wife" or "Mr. Nutmouse grabbed his wife," without ever turning that around. There is a Mouse Army, and apparently mice do not allow women in the military because there are none. The third central animal character in the books is General Marchmouse, who has a wife who is always left at home dithering and worrying for him while he goes out and has adventures, and otherwise plays zero role in the books.
The human children also own gendered toys: the girl has a dollhouse and the boy has toy solders and boats. Like the mice, children of both genders actively accomplish great things, help out, and have ideas. Their mother is dead and they live alone with their father, and in this book that means they live uncared for and in squalor because their dad cannot learn to do what is implied (by Mrs. Nutmouse's internal dialogue) to be women's work of tending children, cooking, and cleaning. There is a point where they say "what they really need is a mother." The kid's dad is also unemployed and doesn't make any effort to get a job, even if a boring one, to support his kids and feed them. He just tickers on his hobbies all day and ignores them, but is depicted as the book to be a harmless, absent, loving character. These kids should be taken away by social services in real life, but the books kind of paint of picture of this scenario being ok and perhaps even expected of a single man. I would completely expect all of this in a book written in the 1950s or earlier and I'm happy to modify the language as I read, it's just really frustrating to see it in books published ten years ago!