[(Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension)] [Author: Eva Jablonka] published on

by Eva Jablonka

Since first publication of this controversial book, much of the initial opposition to the ideas it contained has been replaced by a general, although often grudging, acceptance of them. Advances in knowledge, especially at the molecular level, have enhanced general awareness and interest in epigenetics and the evolution of systems that store and transmit information and put any of the authors' speculations on a more solid basis. This paperback edition contains a new Preface that sets out the major changes in the scientific world and in the authors' own thinking that have occurred since the book was published. A new Appendix provides a selected bibliography of the many books and articles about epigenetic inheritance and its role in evolution that have appeared since first publication.

Genres: Science, Biology

Unknown Binding

First published January 1, 1995

Reviews

[Charlene · Rating 4 out of 5]

While I don't love the title or the constant reference to Lamarck, because in the end, an argument could be made that Darwin's theory was as supportive of epigenetics as Lamarck, I do love the conversation Jablonka brings to the table.

Jablonka is one of my favorite researchers of all time. Her papers and books opened my eyes to the world of epigenetics. She is a pioneer, who worked tirelessly to be heard, despite the horrible treatment she received from Elitist scientists, such as Richard Dawkins, whose own work is stuck in the dark ages of genetic research, while Jablonka's work remains on the cutting edge.

Jablonka is never included in John Brockman's Edge books. Yet, fossils like Dawkins are. It's shocking to me, considering the novel nature of Jablonka's work.

This and ever book and article she has written are worth reading. In each book or paper, Jablonka conducts and exhaustive survey of the occurrence of epigenetics in nature. Armed with myriad studies, Jablonka argues for an update of the "Modern Synthesis", which should be titled "The Not So Modern Synthesis."