I read Roman Blood by Steven Saylor six years ago. Reading historical fiction is an interesting recreation of the past. One can read history, but unless the reader is a scholar, the history books tend to be dry. Historical novels are imaginative recreations of the past on the human level. They are also enjoyable adventures in the past, and the reader is richly rewarded by taking a trip into the past. Roman Blood combines fact with fiction. While the storyline and quality of such novels is not very strong, they blend in a certain level of originality in terms of what has actually happened.
When a historical fiction is done well, it gives images and textures to the dry bones of historical dates, places, and names. I can feel the heat of the Roman sun and the tension of a middle class citizen who works for the rich and very famous in this novel. You can also "feel" the anger (and danger) of Sulla, the ambition of Pompeii the Great, the incredible wealth of Crassus. Finally, this book is about a man who falls in love, who becomes an excellent father, and who consequently feels like a great friend of the reader.
The book is definitely worth reading, especially if you're interested in ancient history or detective stories. Steven Saylor is a professor of classics, or the study of Ancient Greece and Rome, and so this story is largely based on primary sources and actual events told through a fictional eye-witness. It's a very interesting book in both how it handles the history and in the detective and crime story portions. This book is an ancient historical detective novel that includes very detailed insight into the daily lives of people that lived in that society. The setting, interactions, and even the wardrobe is detailed. As a reader, my imagination went wild.
Even though it is "historical fiction" there is a very large amount of accuracy in the setting and historical figures. I was able to look into the individuals and cities, and found them to be portrayed well, most notably the orator and senator, Cicero. I found his life and philosophy to be very interesting given his time in history. It is interesting how Steven Saylor described the social hierarchies and political landscape of the time.
As for the story, it is an ancient detective novel that I like to say is "Alex Cross in Rome." Gordianus is no hero, he is just an ordinary citizen trying to make a living. However, his wit gets him in harm’s way by asking a lot of questions. He is not a fighter but is instead an evasive protagonist.
Roman Blood seem to bring alive real characters such as Sulla and Cicero. You can actually get to see and know them through multiple viewpoints. For example, the character of Cicero is intricately detailed in Roman Blood, and helps us learn more about the original character.
Another plus point is that, these novels attempt to provide the reader with the 'look and feel' of those times. You can, in a way, explore the age. The history and geography is so powerfully narrated that we get to be a part of those times.
Such novels also set the stage for historical events and scenarios. For example, Saylor's novel 'Empire' describe the very evolution of the Roman empire, from its first days during Augustus, through Nero's whimsies, to its peak during the time of Hadrian.
However, it is not a perfect book. Often the fictional characters become a bit too artificial and repetitive. Nonetheless, the good points of the book outweigh the minor bad points.
The setting is accurate, the reader can experience the setting without being there. The dialogue and characters are true to their times, while using modern forms of English, but not the slang or other current expressions that didn't belong in ancient Rome. The plot is compelling.
I definitely recommend this book for readers who like mystery and those who like ancient history as a setting.