TW/CW: discussion of anti-black and anti-Asian racism, as well as sexism.
Dude, why are you like this? Oh. I see.
Readers who aren't familiar with Padura's "Havana Quartet" may find Mario Conde a bit off-putting when they first meet him. To be blunt, he's kind of an asshole, racist and sexist from page one, and unless you've been living in his Cuba-noir world, it's a lot to stomach. Regular fans, however, will rejoice over this novella, while newbies who can stick it out will get the character development they'd hoped for.
Casual racism is, in fact, at the center of this investigation, whether Conde realizes it or not. Someone's been murdered in Chinatown, and it looks like it might be some sort of gang killing: strange markings on the body preclude this from being an ordinary break-in or attempted theft. Conde, who is technically on vacation, gets sucked back in by the earnest pleas of his smoking-hot fellow cop, Patricia, for whom Conde has lusted a long time. Patricia, who is both black and Chinese, begs Conde to talk to her dad, who may be able to grease the wheels of mutual mistrust that can get Conde into Chinatown to solve the murder.
Simple enough, but: Conde's consciousness is pretty much a stream of hot garbage, but in the casual "I'm just a guy" kind of way. Chinese folks are continually referred to as "chinos," and while the translation may muddy the waters here a bit, it's hard as an American NOT to read that word, flung around so casually, as a slur (especially when he makes other stereotypical assumptions and backhanded remarks). There's plenty of anti-blackness in the novella, too, and Patricia isn't so much a character as she is a sexualized character for Mario to project his fear/desire for black women upon. Her father, Juan Chion, speaks in pidgin, which again, may be accurate in translation, but reads as horribly, horribly tone-deaf. It's as if Dashiell Hammett had moved to Cuba and given us Sam Spade from the inside, forever shattering our admiration for the hard-drinking, tough-talking noir detective type.
So, why should you bother, and how on earth can I give it four stars? Readers who insist on character development -- and I am one of them -- will appreciate the slow crawl toward a satisfying payoff, which, while not entirely involving changes of heart or behavior, at least shows a grasp on self-awareness and the possibility of a choice point. The payoff passage itself, which appears on 111, does not redeem the detective so much as it does expand him - yes, he's still an asshole - but he's definitely aware of it. The murder itself is, in fact, secondary to Conde's own interior state of affairs and how he conducts them.
Is that enough? Readers who insist on sympathetic characters can leave this one alone - it will only upset them. Furthermore, nobody needs to read a string of slanders about themselves, so think carefully before offering this to POC readers, and FFS make sure to offer TWs and CWs. Female characters are heavily sexualized and/or reduced to objects designed to improve Conde's character development, so folks who can't hang with sexism can give this a pass as well, especially if it would be triggering.
So, lots and lots of people are not going to like it. Those, however, who like to watch shitty characters move around on the board of self-awareness will be fascinated, even as they find themselves appalled. Conde's an asshole, but he's an intelligent asshole; whether that makes things better or worse is definitely for the reader to decide. Best left to those who enjoyed the "Havana Quartet," so it's an optional purchase unless you've got the whole set, and/or it's popular.
Tl;dr: not good good, but "in this essay I will" good. Recommended, with caveats above.