Julie Cross's "Tempest" is a book I know I'm going to have a hard time discussing without feeling major pangs of guilt gripping me from the inside, because it should've been a story I enjoyed. I didn't enter the book with any major expectations. The premise seemed interesting, and while weary that the time-travel didn't note any major repercussions or system it was based upon, I jumped in headfirst anyway. Because as long as the author makes it work within his/her own systemic plotting, it should be fine, right?
Not so much. *rubs top of her head gingerly*
Now that I've read the entire book, I'll admit I'm surprised it left the editing floor with so many issues - some controversial assertions in an attempt for humor (coming across instead as misogynistic), while other issues had to do with plot displacement; one-dimensional, underdeveloped characterizations; and uneven structure. I like Julie Cross; she seems like a sweet person. I would not hesitate to read further works from her in the future, but I had strong enough objections to "Tempest" that I've decided not to follow further installations in this particular series.
Giving a brief introduction to the plot - 19-year-old Jackson Meyers has the ability to jump through time, which somewhat reminded me of the same system that Steven Gould used in "Jumper" to leap to different places. (Totally cool with me, btw.) Jackson's living in the year 2009, testing the waters of his ability with friend Adam, who comes across as your typical geeky sidekick invested in Jackson's odd ability. In the meantime, Holly, Jackson's girlfriend - whom we're *told* he's madly in love with - suspects that Jackson's hiding something and is a bit on the side of vexed that he's keeping something from her. But she recovers quickly, saying she "can't stay mad at him" and makes him promise "no more secrets" (though he never really tells her the secret he's keeping at the time). The two have a "make-up" make out session, before agents of unknown origin burst into the apartment, corner Jackson, and in the mix of a scuffle - shoot Holly, who dies in the encounter. Jackson time-jumps and winds up stuck in 2007. The story moves on from that point to describe how desperate Jackson is to find out the truth and save the girl he loves.
I guess I should have recognized the warning signs when I realized that I didn't care for Jackson as a leading character. I found his voice displaced for a male protagonist, with some odd turns in my suspension of disbelief. (Citing Dickens in the middle of a make out scene? Come on now…) It made it hard to connect with him. I also didn't think highly of the scene where Jackson and Holly blasted Holly's roommate as an angry feminist. To dispel a prevalent misconception: man-hating does not equal feminist ideals in any consideration. I think that scene was intended in humor, but it wasn't in the slightest, just awkward and misguided.
On the scene with the agents: why did Jackson assume they were reporters or agents? I guess I could understand Jackson suddenly time jumped in a panic, but nothing in that scene made sense enough for me to connect to it. For such an important plot turn in the novel that was supposed to be the push for the start of the story, it dropped the ball quite hard. Not to mention it didn't pull me any closer to connect with Holly just because she was - well, killed - during that scene.
Jackson realizes that he's stuck in form in 2007 (an effect from doing a full time jump as opposed to a half jump which doesn't affect time). He has to account for his activities and being there when he's really supposed to be overseas. He makes an active plan to incorporate himself into the "base" realm he's in. He makes the decision not to go back to his private high school, becomes a janitor at the school Holly attends at the time (awkward much?), and reconnects with Adam in order to make sense of his time jumping situation.
I wasn't convinced when Jackson thought his father might've been behind Holly's death - he really didn't seem impassioned enough about either her death or his father's possible betrayal. I would've thought Jackson would've gone Kamehameha on his father's rear with even the inkling of deception. Not so much. His assumptions come out of thin air and don't really have any links based on information provided to us in the scene, so it feels displaced as well. Except when we figure out he's actually right in his assumptions when the scenes come to pass, but there's no toggling of threads to keep the reader guessing on their own, and I think that would've made for a more compelling story rather than the conspiracy assumptions.
I think at that point I just decided to read forward in the story just to see where it went, but to summarize - I think I would've appreciated this story a lot more if the characterization and references felt less "Hollywood" and more genuine. To repeatedly say that Jackson's ability is "not like the movies" and then make a comparison to "Groundhog Day" not one, not two, but three times in the text suggests improper worldbuilding and contradiction. Not to mention the dumping of pop culture references throughout the text was too much. I don't mind spot references, but if it's thrown in without any sort of intimate value, it's a bust for me.
There were points where I think Cross shows promise, particularly involving a scene with Jackson's deceased twin. It showed that Cross has the capacity to show emotional intimacy and do it well, but it was too far and few between in the events of the novel to redeem it for me as a whole.
The ending had me up in arms. While the scene before it had some decent action and pacing in spurts, having Jackson think "the best way to keep Holly safe is for her not to love/know me at all" felt like a cheap trick at best. If this is supposed to be a story that bases itself on love as much as it does, it didn't show it well enough in the interactions between Holly and Jackson for the most part. There were probably one or two scenes where it came close - but those scenes were more surface emotion than resonant.
I couldn't really recommend this novel for those who like time travel stories because the time travel system is too haphazard. I couldn't recommend this for sci-fi thriller fans because it doesn't keep the pacing well enough throughout the novel to keep interest, let alone the cookie cutter cast (Jackson the good looking, awkward hero, Holly the ideal damsel whose fight scenes made no sense, Adam the ubiquitously referenced smart hacker, Jackson's stern, not so mysterious father, etc.). And lastly, the love story…just doesn't deliver. I'm sure there will be people who enjoy and give more leverage to this more than I did, but there were too many times I had to suspend disbelief and push myself through in order to make it to the end.
Overall score: 1.5/5