Now Available.
Thank you to Random House and NetGalley, for providing an early copy for review. I don't know that I've ever had this many reflections on a novel before.
This novel takes place in the 14th century, in a region which would one day become part of India, in a real city lost to history. Rushdie's mythical re-creation of Victory City is the center of a wildly imaginative saga, in which the author has woven in oblique references to nearly every kind of storytelling: myths, legends, traditions, folklore, history, and even biblical stories, as he examines every part of society and how it functions and dysfunctions.
The story begins unambiguously enough, though tragic. The main character, Pampa Kampana, witnesses a traumatic horror which galvanizes her commitment to a purposeful tenacious life. She becomes a prophetess at a very young age. It's clear that she has been favored with a very old and regal soul. Her chosenness does not protect her, at first, from the real world. She learns well enough that all blessings are mixed, and that people are mostly selfish and hypocritical. It is at this time that she learns to master her emotions and memories.
Pampa is crafty, making clear to her listeners that they are in the presence of a wise prophetess, but also holding back some details in the miraculous directives she provides. She already knows that the great empire will know both victory and defeat, but the hearers of her proscriptions don't need to see the whole picture to put the inevitable in motion. I don't want to spoil the magic of how Victory City comes about, but what I will comment on is how Rushdie has, through this story, highlighted the importance of stories, language and culture, a sense of belonging and shared memories, all of which help us anchor our identity.
The first tensions in the story come from the citizens trying to derive their identity based on who is within and who is outside of the community, and how that should limit the sphere of one's influence. A story as old as time itself. As it is well-known, Rushdie has, for decades, criticized cultism, asceticism, forced conformity, and groupthink. With some subtlety, he makes a case for how religious cults come about. This is a good time to add that the tone is not particularly serious, though the themes and subtext certainly are. The author includes a great deal of satirical humor, and even adds purely intentional anachronisms.
The overarching theme of the entire novel is the importance of stories, and how they can fill in the rifts between people, to prevent the "Us vs. Them" dynamic from occurring in the first place. Not only does Rushdie emphasize the importance of stories, but also he underscores that what we think of as "natural" is whatever has been reinforced as the *correct* way of things. If a feminist ideal has been passed down, along with an expectation that no role is strictly gendered, what might our societies look like?
Just as he emphasizes the importance of stories, even (or perhaps, especially) false ones, Rushdie also accentuates the dangers of stories which suffer from too much manipulation and stretching. And when are people most vulnerable to these bastardized stories? Rushdie points out that often people turn to deep asceticism, fundamentalism, and austerity, during times of great personal misery, even though these pursuits are unlikely to improve anyone's lives.
In developing the character of the gifted, feared, and dangerous Pampa Kampana, the author demonstrates the kind of madness which comes from hubris (mostly among the kings she serves), a dissociative state common among ancient rulers. Brilliantly, the author compares Pampa's untetheredness from herself to the desperation of the Minotaur. The metaphor is striking and telling: the idea that the beast at the heart of the maze of one's own life is in fact, the frightening persona at the core of the self: untameable, ravenous, and forced into a sometimes horrifying existence against its will. Pampa Kampana is nearly ageless, powerful, and has been gifted by a goddess, but is that a satisfying life or a burden?
It is at this moment of the author's incise analysis arriving at the nexus of complex motives, compulsions, and the weight of experience, that I realized that this story has application for each and every reader's life, a remarkable feat. Rushdie states it outright: each of us is a riddle, that we cannot solve. We come closest to understanding our life's purpose at the very end, and that can be both a revelation and an intense point of frustration.
In addition to philosophizing, Rushdie injects a feminist slant into the entire narrative. There are too many familiar patterns of gendered behavior to count, but all are amusing. Even in this magical place in which women have achieved some level of social equality, certain tropes remain:
--an unattractive, yet powerful man will have no trouble finding a beautiful woman to stand by his side.
--a humiliated man will try to cover his shame with violence.
--a woman who continues to chase men late in her life is seen as odd, while it is tacitly accepted that men do so.
--women worry a lot more about ethics and optics than most men.
And to further ruffle a few feathers, the author comes back time and time again to analyze the effects of religion on society. Though roundly cynical in perspective, Rushdie also asserts that those in power only have an interest in religion as a tool for best wielding that power. It's perhaps a little too broad a brush to oversimplify like this, but we have consistently heard this perspective from the author over the years. He is correct in the assertion that religion everywhere tends toward the political.
Religion and government are always a volatile mix, and the people's tolerance for the divine right of kings is always temporary. And the king won't be the only one unhappy with rebellion and slipping influence. Always beware especially the chagrin of a priest.
The author points out correctly that wars are often fought in order to prop up the weak. The practice of pre-emptive attacks of war, and civil war, are neatly deconstructed by Rushdie. With his heavy criticism of so many institutions, the author seems to suggest that not only no one is safe in any social strata, but also no one is particularly noble. In light of what the author has seen in his life, we understand why he comes to the conclusions he does about human nature.
On a decidedly less serious note, there are frequent moments of hilarious banter in the dialogue. I thoroughly enjoyed the very unroyal way each king spoke.
Continuing with his examination of society: another great point the author makes, built on the premise that the victors write all the history, is that we can never know the exact intent of each account giver. And there is always subjectivity in reporting what happened. What we can know, is that no tale exists of any kind that doesn't make somebody mad.
As for art, poetry, song, the author champions their worth. Simpler, yet more profound than tales, they represent expression of all kinds, the work of an unstifled people. This requires some openness among the citizenry, however, and that is the stumbling block for most. The repudiation of prudishness is bound to unnerve those who are most comfortable with boundaries. The "anything goes" approach is not necessarily a great way to lead a society, and the author deftly enumerates why. The rules need to find a comfortable balance which makes the general public okay with them.
In addition, people need immediate clear direction, not waffling. Good leadership leads. If one must make an unpopular decision, it's best not to delay.
As to the related subject of social equality (let alone equity) it cannot be gained without struggle. People find it difficult to accept the dismantling of structures they've known, and replacement with new ones. Most men are fine with women having the right to do what they want, but only if it doesn't cost them in any way.
So, how do leaders get all the factions in a society to work well together? They need to identify as being on the same team. Even widespread adoption of shared symbolism isn't nearly enough to create the societal cohesion necessary for even a near-utopia, however. The twin forces of tradition and superstition have to be folded in. Repression just leads to division.
Part II of the saga turns a bit delirious and fanciful, but also thoroughly enjoyable. As the narrator points out, the truth of a story is in the strength of its telling. Honestly, part of this section really appealed to me. The use of spiritual power is done with humility, a reverent respect for nature, and the responsibility not to upset the balance in the ecosystem. The first part of Part II is so idyllic, I wanted to spend more time there, but of course, the personifications of colonization, industrialization, and rapacious abuse of environmental resources, had to rear their ugly heads.
As mentioned before, There are echoes of many other stories within this epic tale: the Biblical Babylonian exile, the whirlwind taking up Elijah, the perilous winged flight of Daedalus and Icarus, the appearance of the burning bush to Moses, the banishment of Hagar and Ishmael, the hiding of Joshua by Rahab, the rise and fall of the Roman and Egyptian empires, and an extremely thinly-veiled reference to the Renaissance. There's even a clear reference to the recent incident in which a Russian protestor held up a blank piece of paper, and still got arrested.
Back to Victory City, the leader learns the hard way: fascism tends to crop up in a power vacuum, yet it also breeds the rebellion against it. This is when Pampa Kampana finally allows herself some rare self-reflection which quickly turns to self-criticism. She knows that the most important thing is to know who you are, and she worries that she's not much more than a somewhat benevolent (and super manipulative) vampress. Fortunately for her, she meets a man whom I believe to represent the spirit of Fernando Pessoa. (In a wonderful inversion, this Fernão Paes doesn't take on multiple personas like the great Portuguese poet, but instead tells the tall tales of others. This is reminiscent of how Pampa is an inversion of the sorceress in The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe, and certainly the Lion King in this story is no Anselm.
Keeping up with our Easter eggs of hidden references to fairy tales and myths, we actually have a reference to Sleeping Beauty. Ha! That slayed me. Sleeping Beauty (Pampa Kampana) is revived on an auspicious day in 1509, when the Vijayanagar Empire of King Shree Krishnadevraya is established in India. (Henry VIII's reign also starts at the same time.) Known as King of the Lion Throne, he has an unbeatable champion in his nod to Goliath. You'll have to read the story to find out just how unbeatable the giant is.
This is when the references come in at a fast clip and I have to resort to more guesswork than in the first half of the novel. I believe the character of Niccolò de' Vieri is a stand-in for Leonardo da Vinci, especially with the obvious connection to Venice. The character of Hector Barbosa is the murkiest reference for me, possibly modeled on Hayreddin Barbarossa, a Turk, who was the admiral of the Ottoman Empire navy under Suleiman the Magnificent. The sultan connection and the wide travel fit the pattern, but who knows?
There is one last act, reminiscent of the King of Judah, Zedekiah, which sets the stage for the sun setting on an empire. The King, like Lear, learns his lessons too late. It is an example of how stubbornness can create the fire of malice which burns the perpetrator as much as it does the victim.
Pampa, like the survivor she has always been, learns to accept help from the most unlikely of places and an even more unlikely person. These are the kinds of miracles which help to right the balance of justice in at least some small way, with the power of found wisdom.
The author's intent is to demonstrate again and again that women birth empires, and men destroy them. And yet, when one has the opportunity to listen more closely than ever before, and carefully reflect, one realizes that it's the stories that matter in the end.
The fanciful outrageousness of this epic saga is eminently entertaining, and floats a smorgasbord of ideas and tenets. Only Rushdie could have written this novel jampacked with so many topics to ponder and so many intriguing characters.