Janks shows how competing orientations to critical literacy education OCo power, access, diversity, design OCo foreground one over the other. Her central argument is that these different orientations are crucially interdependent and need to work together to create new possibilities."
In the end, I could see that the point she made was important. It's true, she uses bad examples in many places, her writing is dense and disorganized, and her comma usage is atrocious. I found that if I could distill her meaning out of the frustrating morass that I agreed with her. So, she's a smart person who brings together some heretofore disparate theories. It just could have been better written.