I first learned about Saladin in my middle school Social Studies class. It was a lame class, and didn't do anything taught in it justice, especially not Saladin. As we learned about the Crusades I found myself rooting for Saladin rather than the Crusaders, who might be considered "my side". I was therefore delighted to find a biography of him on the shelves of my local library.
Unfortunately, this book didn't live up to expectations. I haven't read any other biographies of Saladin--not even his Wikipedia page--so maybe this is the biography of him there is. It does have rather high reviews here on GR. But I found it rather dry. None of the people sprang from the pages, not even Saladin himself; none of them seemed real or human, just names from a textbook. And so many names! Without any personality to distinguish them, all the names just blurred together.
Newby often used convoluted sentences and confusing pronouns that left me uncertain of who did what. Also, his statements--notably that Saladin was a selfless man who wanted no power for himself and was always faithful to the Caliph--are often at odds with the actions he describes. Now, I'm no expert historian to draw conclusions about the motivations of long-dead men, but I really with Newby had treated these discrepancies with more depths--or even discussed them at all.
In retrospect, I'm pretty surprised I even finished this book. If you really want to learn more about Saladin I suppose it's a decent source, but if you're just reading for fun I'd pass this one by.