Don't be fooled by the unprofessional cover. This book is good stuff.
Morbidly fascinating. Certain chapters just kept me reading and reading, glued to the page long after I needed to go to bed. Others I found rather dry (like, ironically, the drowning chapters). Some did get a bit repetitive, but with the exception of the aforementioned river chapter, I think the repetition was handled fairly well, showing different details with each case. Overall the book was intensely interesting, disturbing, enlightening, and educational. I learned a lot.
The writing itself had a few little issues. I wished they'd explained some of the terminology better, like in the river rafting chapter. I, a layman, had a hard time picturing some of the scenarios because I was unfamiliar with the rafting terms. Some of the other vocabulary was just slightly off. For example, "embattle" is not a fancy synonym of "battle." "Evans and Torres continued capering in their desperate antics to embattle the penetrating chill for nearly three hours." No…the chill embattled them. They didn't embattle the chill. This sort of subtle inaccuracy was sprinkled throughout the book. The many, many uses of "traverse across" or "traverse through" bothered me. If you move in a series of back and forth movements (as you often do in hiking/climbing), then it seems that you can indeed use a preposition after "traverse." Otherwise, "traverse" already means "to move across or through," so if you say "they traversed across the scrub," you're literally saying they moved across across the scrub. It should simply be "they traversed the scrub." Since many of the people traversing things may have indeed been switchbacking, and since perhaps this is specialized canyoneering phrasing, many of these examples were probably technically correct. However, I still think some of their "traverses" should have stood alone. And though the authors must have written phrases like "in Grand Canyon" hundreds of times, never once did they explain why it's not "in THE Grand Canyon," as I've known it my whole life. They're the experts, but I really needed an explanation as to why they dropped the "the."
I wished the charts at the end of each chapter had included a simple count of fatalities at the top, but otherwise they were useful, and the summarizing chart at the end did provide the general numbers.
None of these previous issues are serious, and none detracted significantly from the book.
However, I did take issue, quite seriously, to the way the authors talked about people who commit suicide. The "suicide is a permanent solution to a temporary problem" quote that the authors use more than once is insensitive and often plain wrong. The temporary problem is usually just the straw that breaks the camel's back, after the camel has carried a heavy load for years. People who kill themselves are usually not weak, as the authors pretty much state outright. Instead, they've been strong for so many years, fighting whatever demons haunt them, and their strength has finally run out. People who have never faced clinical depression, mental illness, etc. should not judge those who have. Even people who have faced these problems cannot judge the degree to which others suffer, since they often hide it well. Nor can they accurately understand what opportunities for help are or are not available to them, the many aspects of their lives or personalities that affect the base problem, etc. Saying things like "the rest of us just get on with our lives" shows a deep ignorance of the difficulties some people face. There's a big difference between temporary situational depression or grief and long-term non-situational clinical depression caused by physical imbalances in the brain. Yet the authors show no sensitivity to this. No, suicide is not a good solution. And yes, it is selfish and unethical to do it in a way or place that will put others in danger to try to rescue you or recover your body. But I think the authors would have communicated this message more effectively if they'd showed more compassion.
That major issue aside, I did really enjoy the rest of the book. It's full of great content, from research done during WWII on how the body reacts to heat and lack of water to the strange circumstances around the only mountain lion-related death in the park's history. I found the information about hyponatremia very surprising. I marveled at how grossly underprepared and underinformed some canyon hikers are. I totally agreed with the well-stated arguments about how GPS and cell phones have actually made the Canyon more dangerous. And, perversely, it made me want to visit the Grand Canyon even more.
A great quote in the book, written by dying hiker Bryce Gillies: "I feel like going into the wild is a calling all feel, some answer, and some die for."
I cannot fathom the amount of research that has gone into this book. It's a very useful and interesting source of information. It is also a good lesson in what not to do in the Grand Canyon. I recommend it to anyone interested in the Grand Canyon, the rigors of nature, the power of desert heat, interesting survival stories, unprepared hiker stories, etc. I just recommend that you skip the chapter on suicide.
Rating of suicide chapter: 1 star
Rating of chapters on murder, drowning, air accidents: 3
Rating of first few chapters: 4+