What if Jesus had never been born, indeed, never existed in our world? What would be lost of what we experience today? This is a compelling question, and books that conquer it are few.
The first halfish of the book demonstrates a comprehensive interaction with Western Civilization, a clear line of impact from pagan Greece and Rome to the Christian witness, and a discussion of Judaic influences. The line of reasoning is persuasive, the arguments sound. It is worth reading. However, problems arise as the book progresses, and these strengths diminish as weaknesses grow.
Examples in later chapters are increasingly from America or Great Britain, while the rest of Europe, as well as Roman Catholic and Orthodox Christianity, fade away. The author begins to narrow his field to his own historic roots. The Jewish influence on law, society and religious practice are no longer considered, and the direct link between the pagan world that Jesus Christ impacted and the church today is not as distinctly drawn. I appreciate the effort to provide balance, but some of the statements made regarding where Christianity "got it right" and where Christianity "got it wrong" seem rather lacking in a robust, reasonable, foundation.
Chapters on Art & Architecture, Music and Literature are disastrous. Art & Architecture is pedantic in arguing that clearly Christian constructions are superior because Christians like them, Christians took a long time to build them, they are full of awe, and non-Christians say so too both in words and tourist spending. The Music section, in which all rock music is a condemned as a tool of darkness, is dogmatic and exceptionally curmudgeonly, as the author relies almost exclusively on his own disgust for music composed after the end of the classical age. Additionally, he completely fails to take into account other influences that have changed the musical landscape of the church (the expanded songbook, greater availability of instruments, media, etc) besides the waning influence of Christianity. The Literature section contains more of the sophomoric assertions that plagued Art & Architecture, and fails to consider the development of literature as a whole, creating a feeling that the author either THINKS Christianity is the only influence on literature, or is simply uneducated as to other influences. A follow up edition of essays by experts on these topics would have been an acceptable way to present these sections, because they should have been eliminated from this publication. A short excellent book is better than a long, tiresome one.
The book ends with a whimper in which the author documents English language words and expressions that can be traced back to either Jesus himself or the Christian church. Again, it's only about English now. It's true, without Jesus there would be no church, and without church we wouldn't use the words creed, heresy or martyr, but one has to wonder, does word choice *really* matter? How much influence is Christianity exerting because secular society recognizes we call our church leaders "Pastor" or use the theological term "Trinity." Of course, without Jesus and Christianity, we wouldn't have Christian terms to describe God or the workings of our institutions, but I can hardly see how this really MATTERS to society at large. Without dog shows we also would lose a set of vocabulary for assessing canines, but I cannot imagine such a loss would result in a completely different world, which, if you can remember it, is the original thesis.
It's too bad, really. Editing that would have limited this book to somewhere between 1/2 and 2/3 it's length could have produced a thoroughly readable and highly laudable book. Instead, later chapters highlight the author's myopia, undermine the credibility of his previous efforts, detract from interest in future publications and create a sense of relief that the read is over.