I knew Rajan was interested in cricket, but I didn't know he was good enough to have a few sessions with Surrey in his youth after a successful trial. Perhaps his past as a spin bowler explains the gentle tosses towards his interviewees today, whereas I'd previously assumed he was a sycophant desperate to be near the corridors of power.
I found this to be a fairly typical example of a cricket history, in that factual accuracy was generally preferred to a good story, and the same detail was given to men of 200 years ago as the author's contemporaries. This was undeniably well-researched, but if Richie Benaud couldn't tell with the benefit of multiple television replays that a Warne ball to Ian Bell was just a normal leg spinner that didn't turn, the reliability of accounts from more than a century ago, reliant on a reporter beyond the boundary as a witness, is fairly flimsy to me. At least Rajan acknowledged the differences in techniques and equipment to give an idea of how spin bowling has evolved from the first underarm bowlers.
Considering Rajan is a journalist I was expecting slightly more snappy writing however. It was competent, and fairly concise rather than verbose, but there were a number of times I felt I was reading to finish it rather than reading for pleasure. At close to 400 pages it wasn't short, but it was never in danger of feeling short either. I still learnt about bowlers new to me, and his waxing lyrical about Ajantha Mendis showed him to be right: pronouncing greatness early in a career is a fool's errand. Nonetheless I preferred the sections about more recent bowlers, which were richer and went into their quirks in more detail. This is understandable as there is more information and video available now, but the later section of the book was more confident and readable to me.
It was not just bowling analyses ad nauseum and there was colour for most characters from the earliest spinners to the present day. There was never the sense that Rajan was phoning it in either, and yet I felt it was too much like research for homework. Written by a general print journalist I was hoping for something more interesting, and that the sharp prose would make up for 'only' being a cricket fan rather than writing on it all year round.