Perhaps if the copy I picked up had still had the dust jacket, or found it under the original/ full title of The Mammoth Book of Women Who Kill, instead of just Women Who Kill, I would have realized more the lurid/ cheap nature of the book. The introduction seems to aim at seriousness and credibility, but the quality of writing in the various chapters was all over the map. A few were well-written, intelligent, and obviously well-researched and well-documented. Some were absolutely, dreadfully poorly written. I saw my first usage of "bamboozled" in a "serious" piece of writing. The first two sections were some of the most poorly written in the book, and I almost stopped reading the book after them.
But I'm glad, overall, that I pushed on through. Despite any dreadful quality of writing, and some odd selections of "Women Who Kill" (The "Vampire of Kansas City" never actually killed anyone, if I read the story correctly.), the book was full of a lot of information. I learned more about criminal justice practices of centuries past (way too much torture and class-partial enforcement). Some of the stories were absolutely horrible and disturbing and I needed to take a break after reading them (Rosemary West, for example, and Elisabeth, Countess Bathory). Others were more tragic, such as the woman who killed her Egyptian husband, seemingly in self defense. I was reminded yet again of how often women of previous times were victims of their circumstances. Not that murder is a good answer to almost any problem--but some of the marital conditions some of the women faced were terrible.
So, overall, interesting, although frustratingly executed (haha, no pun intended). And yes, to the one of the other reviewers on here, it did harsh my vibe a bit at times. :)