This wasn't quite what I was expecting, and was a cultural history of modern India more than an account of the IPL's formation. Reading it 10 years on has two advantages, one being how much foresight Astill had, and the other being its capture of the mood when the IPL was in its early stages, free of revisionism.
Most of the book is about the social history of cricket in India, from sectarian teams in the earliest competition, to patronage from princes, and the ongoing conflicts and diplomatic issues with Pakistan. It is a thorough account, and the print is very small to keep the page count down which made me frequently feel drowsy, but I felt my knowledge of India and its politics was enhanced as a result of reading it.
Few sections were given over to politics entirely, which instead provided a backdrop to economic and cultural changes, although Astill's own beliefs were made clear. He stated he'd written for The Economist, although this could have been deduced fairly easily from his views on market economics and the left. (India was obviously hamstrung by its early efforts for equality post-independence, did a lot better economically once liberalised, but for unknown reasons India had got more unequal since then which seemed to be considered bad. Positive discrimination had led to an inefficient civil service, but disproportionate ratios of castes or religions in desirable positions was also bad. Make your mind up mate).
His sociopolitical analysis wasn't brilliant, and you could tell he was a journalist of narrative rather than statistics - the obvious answer as to why India produced good spinners was surely that their pitches suit it and reward spinners more reliably, rather than a cultural or genetic difference. This was odd as he'd rightly dismissed the idea of first-class cricket conforming to traditional Indian longform tales, which was shown to be nonsense when ODI and then T20 cricket became the most popular form.
Astill had secured a decent range of interviews including former players, administrators and Lalit Modi, whose early influence on the IPL was significant. The retelling of the ICL/IPL story seemed a bit patchy to me, and prior knowledge would definitely be beneficial, but I think fundamentally the author just didn't care for T20 that much which coloured his coverage of it. To be fair to him, at the time there were lots of scandals, but it has gone from strength to strength, and the same team owners have controlling interests in most leagues around the world. The players he interviewed still saw it as a bit of a joke, but they were top test cricketers at the end of their careers, and it would have been interesting to hear from more run of the mill players, or younger ones. Perhaps the demise of test cricket has been more gradual than foreseen, but T20 now has both popularity and legitimacy.
Less prescient still was Astill's coverage of nationalism and sectarianism, and Narendra Modi's party has increased both, whereas Astill didn't believe it had much strength politically. This is always a difficulty in political proclomations because the context can change very quickly, but it showed the folly of journalists predicting the future and the limits of their wisdom, on top of the central issue for me that one middle class journalist will never get a true feel for ordinary people in a country of 1bn people, when they rarely capture the mood of a much smaller one they've grown up in.
This was still an interesting book for what it revealed about Indian culture, particularly their reverance for money, even if I felt Astill couldn't always join the dots. He described himself as a cricket tragic but I was not entirely convinced, and saw him more as someone who might watch it on TV and enjoys a day out drinking at Lords. A great book could have been written but this wasn't it.