The first published work of the profilific and brilliant Maria Edgeworth, in literary terms this is really just a curiosity, though it does successfully show off the astute intellect of the author to its height. The edition I read came in three very different parts. Firstly, a pair of letters which contain arguments for and against focusing on the education of one's daughter's reasons and morals as opposed to purely raising her a woman of feeling. Secondly the actual letters of ladies which demonstrate the consequence of living ones life according to feeling rather than reason and thirdly a very witty satire which instructs women on how to successfully argue against their husband and always win (i.e non-rationally). I'm not sure if the third section was published alongside the first two originally.
I found the most interesting section to be the first, which shows the rising awareness amongst both men and women that huge assumptions were made about the nature of women and that men's arguments for continuing to socialise women negatively were tilted entirely in favour of their keeping that status quo. What interested me was that Edgeworth doesn't attack the subject from one of "rights" but instead of "education", seemingly realising that the former as an argument would look to men as "histrionic" and aggressive, but an argument in favour of the potential usefulness and productivity of women, outlining the benefits to society for everyone in their thoroughgoing education (particular as to them making good wives!), may have been more positively viewed as a way forward. I'm also interested in Edgeworth's astute realisation that societal and patriarchal influences do more to shape the nature of women than inherent characteristics, and she seems to firmly reject the notion that women are born as feeling sentimentalists.
The second section isn't as successful, but is intriguing nonetheless. It's far too brief, one sided and to the point, and comes across as one literary author chastising the "feeling" woman for not making the right choices, rather than the open debate seen in the first part. The point is, though, to show the dire consequences of not educating women and again, the negative impacts this has on everyone in society as a whole; but it would have been a much more intriguing novelette had it stood alone and been fleshed out.
Certainly, reading this little essay of sorts has made me want to revisit Edgeworth's work, though this one will probably be of more interest to me and those looking at the history of feminist thought, than casual readers.