What do you think?
Rate this book
Everybody's Jane: Austen in the Popular Imagination
The plethora of Jane-Austen-related fiction and nonfiction--sequels, mysteries, dating guides, invented biographies, and more--that has appeared within the last decade attests to her readers' enthusiasm for re-envisioning her characters as well as herself. Everybody's Jane is the first study to investigate fully these popular appropriations of Austen in England and America, taking into account recent scholarly work on fan cultures and fan fiction. Like these Austen-inspired works themselves, this book stands at the crossroads between studies of popular culture and literary studies; it also offers a major contribution to the ongoing public discussion about the significance and relevance of Jane Austen today.
246 pages, Paperback
First published January 19, 2012
4 people are currently reading
151 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews
January 21, 2018
Somewhere between 3.25 and 3.75.
October 26, 2012
This book looks at the "amateur" readers of Jane Austen and what their sheer enjoyment of her works can bring to the academic table. Also, looked at Jane Austen in popular culture and how the various spin-offs etc. reflect what we want from Jane as well as what that says about ourselves, and the personal connection each "fan" has with their beloved Jane. Loved it! Makes me feel so good to be a "Janeite".
August 7, 2021
This is one of those stories I read before I retired and began reviewing every book I read. I do want to reread all those stories which I did not review but as time has slipped by and I haven't done so, I just want to mark all those stories as "read" so I have a record of the true number of books in the JAFF sub-genre I have read. I am using the average rating at this time as I do not remember how I rated this story back when I read it. If I ever get around to rereading it I will look at my rating to make sure it is true to my opinion. It was published March 22, 2012 so that is most likely when I read it.
Read
July 3, 2021What it says on the tin. I read it for a course and thought it was fine, but not really to my interest. Does that make me a bad Janeite? Perhaps.
If you are interested in the subject matter, go for it.
If you are interested in the subject matter, go for it.
September 8, 2015
One of the truly curious things about Austen is just how many different incarnations of her there are. In the space of two hundred years, the ghost of Austen has been conjured in many different forms: saint, saviour, genius - and of course, more recently, in a wider and wider variety of guises: lover, detective, even bloodsucking and immortal vampire.
Biographies of Austen, and accounts of her work, frequently try to chip away at the layers and layers of disguises she has been coated with, in an effort to get a little closer to the 'real' Austen, to what she 'really' thought and 'really' wrote. But for me, as for many, the 'real' Austen (impossible to ever recover now, try as one might) is sometimes less interesting than the various ideas that people have of her. Partly, because it says a lot about the society they're living in, and partly because it says a lot about individual desires and experiences.
Juliette Wells' book, then, seems an absolute wonder. Everybody's Jane: Austen in the Popular Imagination doesn't attempt to tell us anything new about Austen. Instead, it's interested in inviting us into the world of the popular Jane Austen, a world of TV miniseries, bonnet-making classes, and vampire Jane Austen fan fiction. (Incidentally, I've found a trend among many Austen scholars, all of whom seem to want to avoid telling us 'anything new', as if they are aware of the limitations that a country parson's daughter who wrote six novels might place on truly astounding or ground-breaking analysis and insight. Or maybe they're just being modest.)
The study of popular culture has always been marred, in the past, by a contempt amongst scholars (and, indeed, everyday people) for the subject-matter. Which I have always found to be rather a shame, because finding out what the population at large is consuming seems to me a fascinating insight into the ideologies and practices of our own society. Not to mention that getting paid to watch and re-watch Jane Austen adaptations, read graphic novels, and contemplate the complexities of the Star Wars universe strikes me as a particularly enjoyable occupation.
So I fully expected to enjoy Everybody's Jane. From its introduction it is clear that Wells aims to take as distanced and scholarly approach to her study of Austen in popular culture as possible, an attitude which is clearly necessary for any such undertaking. Indeed, the book is not concerned with the quality of Jane Austen continuations and adaptations so much as the quantity and type of those cultural products.
Wells covers an impressive amount of material: images of Austen, literary tourism, fan fiction, and movie adaptations. But while all of these discussions are interesting, they lack, perhaps a certain depth; Wells does an excellent job collecting and describing various popular depictions and understandings of Austen, but in her task of cataloguing them all she perhaps sacrifices a depth, and a consistent comparative approach, which might otherwise have made this a truly fascinating book. In particular, I would have liked a discussion of Jane Austen as a marketing tool, and perhaps an examination of Austen-based memorabilia, gifts, and toys. Of course, I appreciate that this would probably provide a considerable practical challenge to a scholar, given the ever-changing nature of Austen trinkets available online and in stores, but it's still a fascinating topic that I would love, one day, to see in print.
But I should probably stop focusing on what the book doesn't do, and focus on what it does. As an overview of Austen in the popular imagination, it is a good book. A stronger structure and more focused analysis might have made it a truly excellent one; but for anyone interested in Austen's effect on popular culture, it is a good place to start.
Originally posted at Majoring in Literature.
Biographies of Austen, and accounts of her work, frequently try to chip away at the layers and layers of disguises she has been coated with, in an effort to get a little closer to the 'real' Austen, to what she 'really' thought and 'really' wrote. But for me, as for many, the 'real' Austen (impossible to ever recover now, try as one might) is sometimes less interesting than the various ideas that people have of her. Partly, because it says a lot about the society they're living in, and partly because it says a lot about individual desires and experiences.
Juliette Wells' book, then, seems an absolute wonder. Everybody's Jane: Austen in the Popular Imagination doesn't attempt to tell us anything new about Austen. Instead, it's interested in inviting us into the world of the popular Jane Austen, a world of TV miniseries, bonnet-making classes, and vampire Jane Austen fan fiction. (Incidentally, I've found a trend among many Austen scholars, all of whom seem to want to avoid telling us 'anything new', as if they are aware of the limitations that a country parson's daughter who wrote six novels might place on truly astounding or ground-breaking analysis and insight. Or maybe they're just being modest.)
The study of popular culture has always been marred, in the past, by a contempt amongst scholars (and, indeed, everyday people) for the subject-matter. Which I have always found to be rather a shame, because finding out what the population at large is consuming seems to me a fascinating insight into the ideologies and practices of our own society. Not to mention that getting paid to watch and re-watch Jane Austen adaptations, read graphic novels, and contemplate the complexities of the Star Wars universe strikes me as a particularly enjoyable occupation.
So I fully expected to enjoy Everybody's Jane. From its introduction it is clear that Wells aims to take as distanced and scholarly approach to her study of Austen in popular culture as possible, an attitude which is clearly necessary for any such undertaking. Indeed, the book is not concerned with the quality of Jane Austen continuations and adaptations so much as the quantity and type of those cultural products.
Wells covers an impressive amount of material: images of Austen, literary tourism, fan fiction, and movie adaptations. But while all of these discussions are interesting, they lack, perhaps a certain depth; Wells does an excellent job collecting and describing various popular depictions and understandings of Austen, but in her task of cataloguing them all she perhaps sacrifices a depth, and a consistent comparative approach, which might otherwise have made this a truly fascinating book. In particular, I would have liked a discussion of Jane Austen as a marketing tool, and perhaps an examination of Austen-based memorabilia, gifts, and toys. Of course, I appreciate that this would probably provide a considerable practical challenge to a scholar, given the ever-changing nature of Austen trinkets available online and in stores, but it's still a fascinating topic that I would love, one day, to see in print.
But I should probably stop focusing on what the book doesn't do, and focus on what it does. As an overview of Austen in the popular imagination, it is a good book. A stronger structure and more focused analysis might have made it a truly excellent one; but for anyone interested in Austen's effect on popular culture, it is a good place to start.
Originally posted at Majoring in Literature.
January 31, 2013
I enjoyed this book. It's an academic (but very accessible) survey of Jane Austen in the non-academic consciousness. Wells had chapters on Jane Austen societies, collectors, movies, literary tourists and fan fiction. The majority of the material was new to me - particularly the chapters on collectors, societies, literary tourists and fan fiction. She also covered different editions of Austen - which ones are written for academics and which ones for people who like to **think** they are academics (apparently, my favourite Austen editions fall into that category :) ).
All through out this book, Wells makes some very interesting observations about academics vs amateurs (or "Janeites" .. people who love Austen and her books but don't do it for a living). This conversation is masterfully handled in the book and Wells has some great insights about these two different yet similar groups.
Possibly the best thing about this book are the notes and the bibliography. I like to think I've been on an Austen tear lately, but that is not true - there is a big world of Austen-related content out there I haven't even begun to explore. Really great to have this all in one place.
If you're an Austen fan, this is an excellent current survey of everything Austen in the popular culture.
All through out this book, Wells makes some very interesting observations about academics vs amateurs (or "Janeites" .. people who love Austen and her books but don't do it for a living). This conversation is masterfully handled in the book and Wells has some great insights about these two different yet similar groups.
Possibly the best thing about this book are the notes and the bibliography. I like to think I've been on an Austen tear lately, but that is not true - there is a big world of Austen-related content out there I haven't even begun to explore. Really great to have this all in one place.
If you're an Austen fan, this is an excellent current survey of everything Austen in the popular culture.
February 3, 2013
A collection of analytical essays by Juliette Wells focused on Jane Austen as she has been imagined in modern popular culture. Highlighting the amateur (here she chooses the more positive definition of someone who is eager and ready to enjoy, rather than the more negative ideal of an unskilled/inept person) communities that embrace the idea of enjoying Austen on a personal level, an idea most shocking and frivolous to the academic community. Chapters are devoted to an Austen collector, Austen's image (and re-imaginings of her in modern art and literature), Austen as self-help, tourism in relation to the author and her novels, literature and film inspired by her work, and the overall communal and accessible aspects of her work.
As a fan and academic I appreciate the care taken to study and present the various aspects of Austen in pop culture. Parts of the introduction made me feel as if this could be a direct challenge to those that often criticize Austen, especially the appreciation for her work. It also serves to define the amateur community from the academic, yet gives them both room to talk to and between each other.
As a fan and academic I appreciate the care taken to study and present the various aspects of Austen in pop culture. Parts of the introduction made me feel as if this could be a direct challenge to those that often criticize Austen, especially the appreciation for her work. It also serves to define the amateur community from the academic, yet gives them both room to talk to and between each other.
July 29, 2019
I have NO idea how this book hit my shelf....but I grabbed it for the reading challenge. I expected a book about Jane Austen for the every day fan (which the author keeps claiming this book is!)--- instead this is a collection of academic "articles" written about Jane Austen....but boring enough that I don't care to recommend it for others. The author does take a very diverse mix of topics-- but nothing that a reader/fan/enthusiast would want to track down in order to better understand Ms. Austen or her characters. I really think this book was NOT written with fans in mind which is not a problem, just don't say it is in the introduction (the blanest part that I almost skipped....and wish I had!)
The chapter on Alberta Burke was interesting--- a woman who spent a lot of time and money collecting articles/books/memorabilia of Jane Austen. The other chapters were also--- good, but maybe didn't need to be as dry...or long. The chapter on places to visit to be closer to Jane was a great idea--- but it needed more heart and less....sigh.
Read if you enjoy academic articles and stuff on Ms. Austen
2019 Pop Sugar Reading Challenge: A book with "pop, "sugar" or "challenge" in the title.
The chapter on Alberta Burke was interesting--- a woman who spent a lot of time and money collecting articles/books/memorabilia of Jane Austen. The other chapters were also--- good, but maybe didn't need to be as dry...or long. The chapter on places to visit to be closer to Jane was a great idea--- but it needed more heart and less....sigh.
Read if you enjoy academic articles and stuff on Ms. Austen
2019 Pop Sugar Reading Challenge: A book with "pop, "sugar" or "challenge" in the title.
January 24, 2020
For a book that was supposed to be for the 'amateur' reader of Jane Austen, this was remarkably dull and dry in places. There was an excessive amount of plot detail of several genre-bending-fanfic works. There was also an in-text reference so a piece of art work the author had seen in Winchester Cathedral that was apparently on the frontispiece of the book.... I couldn't see it.
Perhaps it didn't appeal as it was more geared to an American audience? Anyway, I don't think it is worth a place in my Austen-related collection as I don't feel I got anything from it. Looking at popular fanfic and visual adaptations, it's also something that is already feeling pretty dated.
Perhaps it didn't appeal as it was more geared to an American audience? Anyway, I don't think it is worth a place in my Austen-related collection as I don't feel I got anything from it. Looking at popular fanfic and visual adaptations, it's also something that is already feeling pretty dated.
July 25, 2023
Pretty interesting, but fairly dry and disjointed. I was left wondering who this book is for.
May 1, 2026
I know too much about Jane Austen fanfiction
August 13, 2015
Check out my review @ http://chroniclesofabooknerd.blogspot...
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12 reviews