This book gave one view of how we got where we are in public education. I liked the ideas about how to move toward this "forth way," but I want another whole book that begins where this one ends!
Hargreaves and Shirley provide synopses of the "three prior Ways of change since World War II," with a focus on how those change strategies have played out in education. They then present "foundational principles" for a "new Fourth Way of change," with evidence of its emergence.
"The Fourth Way ... is a democratic and professional path to improvement that builds from the bottom, steers from the top, and provides support and pressure from the sides."
While I most appreciated their framework, metaphors, and resources included in the Notes, I suspect what resonated most for me was how closely aligned their vision and theory of change is to my own.
so, this book was on a previous syllabus for a class i'm teaching this summer on creativity, collaboration, and educational change. it is a concise, easy to read summary of various "ways" of school reform (although i think the word "wave" might have been more appropriate). their proposition in "the fourth way" encompasses many ideas i agree with, particularly meaningful community engagement/democratic education. however, the book is a bit too list-y and metaphor heavy (the authors LOVE some alliteration in their list titles). basing your theory of action for educational change on lists of key principles, etc., can over simplify otherwise complex issues.
3.5 actually....the authors have the right idea. We need to let responsibilities to education supersede accountability. There is no "one size fits all" approach to fixing our schools. We need to embrace our diversity. This can not be done through standardized teaching and testing. Every stakeholder needs to share the responsibility and take an active role in their community schools. The community should be held accountable for our students, not just the teachers.
Description pretty much sums it up. Great for giving some historical perspective to where we are, and where we are going - or at least where we should go. Good insights but very little that a building leader can implement.
CHronologically presented ideas on the evolution of education and inspring ideas on the future for educational change. However, do these ideas serve as buzz words or they provide genuine thinking to drive and implement a new educational change?