I will push this book on any stark Democrat or Republican I meet. Bob and Cal outline the historical progression of Washington's climate change toward partisanship and hostility, explain how this climate does not help the nation's interest (nor, for very long anyway, does this benefit the interests of either polarizing party), and prescribe a responsible rhetoric upon which a favorable candidacy might be built without said candidate having to water-down the tenets of their stance. Additionally, their respective suggestions for policies ranging from term-limits to informational availability regarding benefits/options for same-sex marriages and expectant mothers prove their willingness to commit to an agreeable consensus on issues which divide their respective ideologies. Having heard a great number of people express apathy toward politics as a result of the hostile, unproductive plague of Congressional appointments, this book is a rallying call for voters and politicians alike, of any stance. Published in 2007, during the early stages of Barack Obama's campaign for presidency, they felt that the language of his campaign channeled the nation's desire for bipartisanship and consensus. His victory using this language of consensus, as well as his successes in grassroots campaign funding, prove their point: common ground is no longer such a hard sell with the American public, rather it speaks to their desire to reconnect with progress in Washington. I would be interested come 2016 how Bob and Cal feel his two terms lived up to (or defied) the message in "Common Ground".