really enjoyed this!! i thought it was about just trees when i got it lol but im glad it was about so much more. quite a few reviews seem to be saying this is a dense read but i didn’t find that the case at all.
as always, all the statistics on all the damage we have done to the planet is sobering and shocking. and all the information about the different ecosystems - how there is so many different aspects needed to work in balance etc., the importance of rewilding, introducing/keeping native animal/plants etc. - was so so interesting.
reading these books and learning more about ecosystems, climate change facts etc. really helps with the apathy/ambivalence i increasingly feel towards nature/our earth/the climate crisis. of course, intellectually i care about these - i vote for the greens, i’m vegetarian, i do what i can where possible. but these books really ignite my passion for these issues and also really make me appreciate nature so much more which i’m glad about.
i want to get back to finding awe and appreciation in nature bc for so long i've just been apathetic. i feel like reading these books helps (esp david attenboroughs)
some other thoughts
- found the conservation efforts of the netherlands’ national ecological network, india addressing poaching (or more specifically, the attitudes towards the locals and poachers - see the quote below), australia’s mining companies, and america’s fisheries the most interesting (ETA i just looked up the fate of Oostvaardersplassen and it is v depressing :/)
- i appreciated the focus on considering local community needs//desires. and the reminder that while focussing on the inherent value of our earth is great, it’s not realistic and we need to consider the other benefits too.
- one critique i have: the author really was not critical enough of some of the companies at times - eg the mining companies
- didn’t realise until i started reading that this book is like 20 years out of date now - it would be interesting to read some more recent case studies! and see how these case studies have been going
- really liked the ending and the reminder of the importance of individual actions. some things that stood out for me that i can do: volunteering, consuming less, purchasing more sustainable products especially food (looking out for those certifications), enjoy nature - and help others do too, compromises (eg. offsetting). my purchasing power is a big one for me now that i have a full-time job and disposable income! especially as i am considering having to reintroduce meat for health reasons - need to look to ensure i am choosing sustainable sources etc, and do more research on the environmental factors of what i eat in general.
some quotes that stood out to me
- “How can we be expected to care about what we no longer experience, what we no longer know?”
- “Nature is jammed full of such wonders, and what makes me an ardent conservationist is the desire that my children and the generations that come aer them can have their own opportunities to be enticed, amazed, and humbled.”
- “Conservation’s not supposed to be about shooting poor people, whatever they’ve done. Despite being responsible for the deaths of five rhinos and being prepared to kill his ex-colleagues, Golap Patgiri doesn’t strike me as an evil man (and I’m no longer sure he’s the real enemy). Under the same difficult circumstances how many of us would have done the same thing? And the price that Matiram and his neighbors pay year in and year out because they’re not as intolerant as the rest of us when it comes to living alongside damaging and dangerous creatures: for all our rhetoric about the need to share the planet with other species, which of us would willingly put ourselves in Matiram’s shoes? We—the mostly well- off conservationists and nature lovers who want to live in a world with rhinos and tigers and elephants—are free riders in the system, and we owe Matiram Phukon and millions like him a huge debt for their forbearance. But the tolerance of those in poor farming communities across India (and indeed, large parts of Africa and Latin America) can no longer be taken for granted, and many are beginning to argue that more of us should be foot- ing a fairer share of the bill. Conservation is responding. Concerns about its human costs are leading to changes in the way it is being practiced on the ground in Assam and beyond. Mr. Boro’s ideas about engaging with local people are becoming the norm; Uam Saikia’s more radical proposals to provide alternative routes out of poverty are becoming widespread. In some places those paying the up-front costs of conservation are beginning to receive payments for continuing to do so from distant beneficiaries.”
- “But he has a more fundamental motivation too, one borne of a profound sense of custodianship for the land. As he puts it, “while the problem is daunting now, it is still just about manageable. If I left it for the next generation, it would simply be impossible.””
- “But the problem is that only approving small operations that scarcely need to change isn’t exactly going to make a major dent in the sustainability of global fishing practices. Instead, the MSC argues, it also needs to work with less-than-perfect fisheries: finding the better operations, encouraging them to improve prior to full assessment and then, providing they score highly enough, stipulating further improvements as conditions of certification. Engaging with the imperfect rather than simply endorsing the already-virtuous.“