For as provocative, striking, and frankly creative as Freud’s ideas on the origins of taboo are (and by extension the entire social apparatus of morality, religion, law…), his speculations upon anthropological histories through the framework of psychoanalysis are predicated off a boatload of rather tenuous assumptions - which, as always, he candidly admits (with characteristic wit and fluency).
What I can very much grant him authority on, however, is neurosis, which is seriously fleshed out here in fascinating ways. I feel significantly more comfortable with the concept now, as Freud understands it, and for all its audacity, at least the analogies between neurosis and primitive totemism serve to reveal much about the former with welcome clarity — a great irony to be sure, since his intention was evidently to use it primarily to elucidate and inform his observations of the latter instead.
The anthropological conclusions are incredibly compelling and some of the parrallels drawn throughout are stunningly weaved together, but i found myself resonating far more with what they tell us about psychoanalysis than what they told us about some hypothesised original condition.
All in all, a fun, thought-provoking read, and whilst i don’t intend to go off telling everyone that, actually, civilisation was borne from out of the primal father’s murder, the idea will certainly leave its mark. On first blush, I at least don’t find myself desperate to condemn it as some outrageous hogwash, which may well just be a symptom of my chronic “not-being-an-anthropologist”-itis more than anything else.