I started reading this book in October. It was borrowed from the library and I renewed it, but had to return it afterwards, not yet finished. After my schedule got a bit less crazy, I took it out again and have again renewed it. I can read books quickly, but this one was to important to me to race through. I've read several chapters several times and anticipate reading this book again in the future.
Written by Chesley (Sully) Sullenberger, the US Air pilot who successfully landed his disabled plane on the Hudson River, it is a collection of interviews he held with a broad range of 'leaders' whom he admired to discuss qualities of leadership. Many of the people are well known, while others are less well known. Each chapter is largely self-contained, although there are cross references to underline particular points. The book was written because Sullenberger wanted to take advantage of the publicity he was experiencing due to the 'miracle on the Hudson' to draw attention to critical aspects of our society which needs attention.
A couple of key points which caught my eye. He criticizes the 'drift towards expedience' or in other words, the tendency to cut corners due to production pressures. A discussion with Robert Reich describes the problem with the seduction of leadership of 'martyrdom'. Working so hard to result in personal burnout if a sign of a poor leader. The authors (book was co-written with Douglas Century, who was probably responsible for the physical description of each person interviewed) repeatedly underscored the importance of failing to compromise among leaders. Michelle Rhee would not start negotiations withe the teachers' union in DC with the points they agreed on (a waste of time) but would start with the points of disagreement. The importance of delegation was pointed out in several cases as being the only way to effectively lead because leaders cannot do everything that needs to be done. I also very much appreciated various business leaders cautioning against paying too much attention to the short term directions of financial analysts. It cannot be completely ignored, because it does focus one's attention on the business, but it should not be the only consideration made.
A minor criticism is the continued bias towards ivy-league institutions and thinking. At one point, during the interview with Michelle Rhee, complimenting her change of the Washington DC school system as becoming 'ground zero for education reformers ... when young graduates from Harvard and Stanford were streaming to work as interns in her office...' I can't help but think that the Washington DC system would be better served if young graduates from all over were streaming to work, rather than simply the perceived elite. (I have a similar concern about the current makeup of our Supreme Court.)
A worthwhile read with lots to think about.