Substance: 1/5
Readability: 1/5
I'm a seminary student and this was required for reading for class.
First, I don't consider myself theologically Reformed. It's quick to see that Purves does see himself that way. It's worth drawing attention to our theological differences before the following review, but I will attempt to review the book without allowing theological differences to cloud the way I review it.
I’m a reader who is more sensitive to an author’s organizational decisions. Presentation and organization can dramatically affect the way an argument is received and/or retained. Unfortunately, organization and presentation in Crucifixion of Ministry made my experience a negative one. The information is subtitled to the max: divisions have subdivisions, and even subdivisions have subdivisions. What’s left is a series of dozens of short quips that lack transition and unity. This was distracting, and made the experience an awkward and clunky one.
Underneath the clumsiness, Purves’ content did little to redeem the work for me. First, the overall tone towards pastoral ministry is a negative one. I felt like I had to free myself of Purves’ negativity towards the field (and towards human beings!) in order to get at the heart of what I think he was trying to say. However, his pessimism in phrases and rhetorical questions left me dreading and doubting pastoral ministry more than critically and theologically examining it. Even the title of the work, “Crucifixion of Ministry”, was one that I had to separate from the books content simply because it filled me with so much dread.
There are times that Purves attempts to teach theological point, and even moments where I think he is succeeding. I especially liked the first couple pages to his “What’s in a Name?” chapter. But I think ultimately the good, takeaway content is buried too deep within the negativity, pessimism, and organizational clunk. I found difficult trying to understand what Purves is encouraging me to think about, practice, or frame my ministry. When I felt like I did, he only drowned the simplicity in more theology that either seemed unnecessary or redundant.
I'm left wondering how the book even got past an editor in the first place. It's not a fun read. Readers are better off reading something more positive, less biased, and encouraging.