What do you think?
Rate this book


28 pages, Kindle Edition
First published December 1, 2011
My contention is one can have several homes, instead of a single, fixed homeland. One can belong to numerous cities and cultures and peoples, regardless of the way current politics situates them apart.
My contention is one can have several homes, instead of a single, fixed homeland. One can belong to numerous cities and cultures and peoples, regardless of the way current politics situates them apart.
'The more one is able to leave one's cultural home, the more easily is one able to judge it, and the whole world as well, with the spiritual detachment and generosity necessary for true vision.'
One can even feel Western in the East but Eastern in the West ... There are many people like this and there will be many more in the century to come.
In a system where human beings are confined to one solid and stable identity, as opposed to having open-ended multiple connections, it will be harder to find a common ground that will keep them together.
All kinds of extremist, exclusivist discourses are similarly reductionist and sheathed in tautology. Either/or approaches ask us to make a choice, all the while spreading the fallacy that it is not possible to have multiple belongings, multiple roots, multiple loves.
Yet, paradoxically, a reduction of anxiety is surely one of the reasons why people relocate. They move to other lands not simply for the sake of money, jobs, education or freedom. Behind their willingness to pull up stakes may simply be the wish to be happy.
In an age of migrations and movements, when many of us already dream in more than one language, it is time to discard 'identity politics' altogether.
Among the rich and the poor, liberals and conservatives, East and West ... We tend to form comfort zones based on similarity, and then produce macro- opinions and clichés about 'Others', whom, in fact, we know so little about.
When people stop talking, genuinely talking, to each other, they become more prone to making judgements.
And on and on we wallow in this quagmire without ever realizing how our own fears serve to buttress the very things of which we are afraid.
Democracy, a true, robust democracy worthy of the name, does not depend solely on political parties, politicians and parliaments. Nor does it draw only upon institutional checks and balances. More fundamentally, it needs people who have faith in democracy, citizens who trust that their opinions matter and who, together with others, are willing to contribute to a better future.