Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Architecture of Humanism: A Study in the History of Taste

Rate this book
The Architecture of Humanism offers a brilliant analysis of the theories and ideas behind much of nineteenth- and twentieth-century architecture. It discusses the classical tradition as reflected in the architecture of Renaissance and Baroque Italy and the role given the human body in that tradition. It is recommended reading for all architecture students, and essential for those interested in the revival of classical architecture.

197 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1914

6 people are currently reading
174 people want to read

About the author

Geoffrey Scott

62 books3 followers
There is more than one author with this name.

Geoffrey^Scott

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
10 (26%)
4 stars
9 (23%)
3 stars
10 (26%)
2 stars
7 (18%)
1 star
2 (5%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Simone.
55 reviews1 follower
April 4, 2025
Just didn’t do it for me. Undeniably a flawlessly argued position, and I totally buy his argument, like totally. I also think the fallacies he outlines are a great way to assess criticism and evaluation of all arts. But winding up in a place of effect/affect doesn’t do it for me. The book just couldn’t get me where i wanted to go, but i don’t regret reading it of course. The biological fallacy is a brilliant way to understand what went wrong with art history, that’s the best part.
Profile Image for Hana :).
27 reviews
January 1, 2023
Some interesting points, but mostly a bore with quite the hubristic tone. Really had to chore through this one...
Profile Image for Alexander Craghead.
4 reviews8 followers
Currently reading
October 11, 2012
This book disappoints me a bit, but in other ways is useful. It seems more a polemic work of advocacy, a kind of argument for why a specific type of architecture is morally better than another, rather than an introspective analysis of a period of architecture. This bothers me as a work of scholarship, but turning it on the head, it makes the work an interesting window into contemporary thought. It would be good to know how influential the author was on thinking about buildings and space in his time.
7 reviews
Read
December 3, 2015
good book but hard to understand, i have read it twice but still there are some unclear parts!
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.