Had to read this for a grad school application. Did not like it. I won’t get into my reasoning here too much, I’ll save it for the reading response I need to submit with the application, but I don’t feel that this book is a good assignment for Marriage and Family Therapy students. The author seems to write off types of therapy outside of Bowen theory and says therapists “bought into the picture of family I presented to them and none of them suggested that I might sit down with various family members, talk with them, get to know them, or learn to see myself within the context of their lives and the emotional system of which we were all a part” which sounds like either bad therapy or a misrepresentation, encouraging clients to talk things through with family members is a pretty basic thing and any MFT should be encouraging clients to see themselves within the context of the emotional systems they’re part of. Maybe things were different when the book was written.
I think the work as it’s presented in this book is either far too individualistic or expects the individual to be responsible for changing their family dynamic. The book also does not allow for the possibility that sometimes, maintaining a relationship with certain family members is not possible or beneficial. There is no mention of caveats for abuse, and several times domestic violence is analyzed through the lens of Bowen theory which, in my opinion, comes up seriously short.
Anyway, I’ll have to more properly formulate my thoughts on this book later rather than in a late-night aggravated Goodreads review, which is probably not particularly eloquent, but I do think I’ll write in my application that I didn’t like the book. Hopefully I’ll get points for honesty.