Why does the modern economy consist of two a fast one for the super-rich and a stalled one for everyone else? What decisions led to this split three decades ago, and were their goals realised? What is the cost of a two-track economy? Have the real solutions to the 2008-9 crisis been missed? This ground-breaking book, based on years of research, seeks to answer these questions and provide the hard - for the economic case for dismantling the economy for the super-rich; - that deregulation failed to deliver innovation and economic revival; - for new policies that avoid the looming permanent recession. At a time when top investors such as Warren Buffett call for an end to the coddling of billionaires, this urgent, provocative book provides a radical new way of thinking for ending the economic deadlock.
A really good an accessible book on the pitfalls of a de-regulated financial system, going in to detail about the disastrous effects it's had on the economy including specific examples, for example the account of the private takeover of Debenhams will really make your blood boil.
It's astonishing that some people still believe that de-regulation is the only way forward, and that the markets are naturally self-regulating. It's alarming that these people seem to make up our government.
An excellent book on the problems facing the economy today and the rising inequality. Written simple enough for me, with a very little understanding of economics, to grasp.
I have mixed feelings on this. Lansley makes a reasonably compelling argument and it contains more detail on both private equity and hedge funds than I've read elsewhere.
However, I wanted to see the overall assertion (that growing wealth inequality is actually damaging to the economy, quite apart from the social and moral arguments) nailed down with academic rigour, and this book doesn't do that.
It's too much of a polemic for my taste, and not enough of an analysis. That said, if we assume that Lansley has been fair in how he uses quotations, then some of the strongest arguments come from the industry, finance, economics and government luminaries that are referenced. When we have these people saying the system is broken, then I think we have to listen.