What do you think?
Rate this book


224 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1997
This series didn't really appeal to me at all at first glance though I didn't give it a very long first glance. It's a police procedural set near the twin cities of St Paul and Minneapolis. I was expecting something more cozy but the crime depicted in the first chapter doesn't belong with that expectation.
[The rest of my comments on this book are drawn from the mailing list discussion and contain spoilers]
[On the characters]
I read this a couple of weeks ago and the characters have faded from mymemory pretty fast but on the whole I thought the characters were thinbut well drawn.
In common with book number one in many series I felt this book was anintroduction. I quite liked Jake though I didn't get a good handle onhis character, but that's quite good for a series because I'd like toknow more about him and don't feel that I've been given chapter andverse on his life and there's nothing more to know.
I thought the author did a good job of introducing secondary characterswith a minimum of fuss; I got the idea that there were various differentpeople about without getting overpowered by too many characters. Forexample the trainee girl cop whose name I've forgotten: I knew enoughabout her to make her role in the finale believable but not enough thatI got bored with hearing about her.
I think I prefer it when characters that you only meet twice in a bookaren't fleshed out too fully; sometimes characters can be overdone andthey just seem like thick cardboard cutouts rather than real people. Ithought Gunn introduced a lot of characters, especially Jake'scolleagues, but I didn't feel overwhelmed by them all.
[On the plot]
No, I wasn't particularly satisfied with the plot. I found the wholeserial killer plot to be way too big for the book. In common with_Dreaming of the Bones_ I felt a little cheated by not seeing theconnection to another teenagers disappearance though I think Gunn playeda little fairer than Crombie. From now on I'm going to view any mentionof a missing daughter in a book as a surefire pointer to the motive formurder ;-)
I found the plot a bit contrived, not totally realistic but notcompletely silly either. I think a lot of the shock of the murders waslost due to the book's title. I was expecting three of *something* andthe obvious something was 'murder' when nothing else turned up in athreesome early on in the book. I'm not sure whether the puzzle aspectof the message in the mutilations and photos was a strength or aweakness of the plot. On the one hand it seemed to be the sort of thingthat belonged in a more cozy book and seemed a bit convoluted for arealistic series of murders, but on the other hand it was neatlyexplained and related to the motive for the killings. Althoughcomplicated murders like this don't seem very true to life I thoughtthat Gunn created Andy Dornoch as a revenge murderer with a valid reasonfor setting the scenes up as he did.
I think I was satisfied with the resolution. It wasn't the sort of bookto linger over and mull in your mind afterwards so I didn't pick up onany silly coincidences or dumb things thrown in for effect in thefinale. In summary I thought the plot was complete and well puttogether but that everything happened a little too fast and a little tooneatly. I liked the sparsity with which many of the characters weredrawn but I'd have liked a bit more meat on the plot.
[On setting, pacing, point of view etc.]
The setting could have been pretty much anywhere for me; any satellitetown of any major city. I didn't get a strong sense of what Rutherforditself was like. The most memorable idea of place I got from the bookwere the mentions of the spring after a cold Minnesota winter.
The book seemed too thin to me and the pacing did seem off. I don'tknow if it's justified but I felt the book was all bunched up towardsthe back. I think this is because the title led me to expect threedeaths and I was subconciously expecting to get them out of the way andto then get into the guts of the story whereas the murders were evenlyspread through the book. There seemed to be significant sections of thebook where nothing much happened and Jake lay about in his fishing boatcontemplating his navel to not much avail. There are characters who canget away with this - Sharon McCone could fly her plane for days whilstcontemplating her navel and I'd be deeply engrossed and wouldn't care atall - but Jake hasn't earnt that from me yet.
I think Jake's point of view was the major weak point in this book forme. He seemed a fairly run of the mill cop character. Interestingcertainly, but not outstanding in any sense. I didn't feel he hadanything invested in the outcome of the case. Only at the very end didhe actually face any danger and he was just investigating the casebecause it was his job. I know that that is how it works in the realworld but I felt that the book would have been better if Jake had seemeda little more involved and a little less of a detached observer.
[On what i thought of this as a first book]
It came over to me as a 'first in the series' because of the sketchy background of the main character. Gunn left many things open about his past, I presume this is so that she can fill in the detail later. It also seemed to be an 'author's first book' because I didn't feel it did much to make me care about the characters or about the outcome of the case. I didn't feel much of an emotional response to the victims. I've just looked on the web and it looks like this wasn't her first novel though. As well as several non fiction books she's written two books that sound like non mystery fiction.
I'd hope that the second in the series would bring me closer into the characters and evoke stronger emotions in me.
[Overall]
Overall I thought the book was pretty average. Whilst I enjoyed the book as a whole it wasn't anything special. I think Jake's voice needs developing, he wasn't very memorable to me. Gunn has laid down some intriguing foundations about his mysterious origins and I think once we know more about him he'll become a more memorable character. I felt the author almost wanted him to be nondescript in this book.
If this wasn't a group read then I wouldn't be rushing out to get my hands on _Par Four_