Page one: “These twenty-five studies are not meant to be read as a book. If they were, a much more detailed text would have been given. Rather, they are to be follow to be a help in a study of the Bible itself.” I feel strange, therefore, reviewing this since I *did* read this straight through, as a book (whoops).
So, I will not review it as such, since it is a collection of Bible studies. Instead, I’ll review it as a collection of Bible studies. And for that, I give it 2 stars only.
Now, I’m torn about it. For on the one hand, the logic and the Bible passages for the studies are spot on. His theology is good. And his little snippets after each text are often helpful.
But on the other hand, these just aren’t Bible studies—at least not how I consider Bible studies (but perhaps that’s because the term has changed since this was published in 1972?). Each of the 25 “Bible studies” is a topic (eg. our relationship with God the Father) with like 20-40 Bible texts listed for each topic, with a short explanation of each text. That’s it. No probing questions or things to leave with or pray about. So it’s more like a topic with then a bunch of verses you can look into about that topic. If someone, then, were to do these as “bible studies,” it would take hours to do just one, because there’s so many verses to look up. This technically is studying the Bible, but I don’t consider these “Bible studies.”
But again, perhaps that’s because the term has changed since 1972—since we now see Bible study as one text (or maybe a few) with exegesis, probing questions, and applications. Either way though, I don’t think I could ever really recommend the book (I’d just recommend an easier systematic theology book instead).
Yet still, I’m sure God used it for good in the lives of many. For again, his logic is good, his comments are helpful, and his Bible text choices are excellent.