The Arctic Home in the Vedas was published in 1903. In ‘The Orion’ Tilak had shadowed the ‘astronomical method’. In The Arctic Home in the Vedas, he based his theory on the latest researches in geology and archaeology bearing on the primitive history of man.
Tilak in the preface to The Arctic Home remarks that after pursuing this line of research for a long time, “the conclusion that the ancestors of the Vedic Rishis lived in an Arctic home in inter-glacial times was forced on me by the slowly accumulating mass of Vedic and Avestic evidence.”
Tilak uses astronomical figures within hymns to compute the age of Vedas. Not only does he date their composition prior to 4000 BC, Tilak’s investigation places Aryan antiquity in the Arctic region. Pushed from the Northern tundras by an Ice Age, Tilak suggests, they migrated down to Central Asia and then eastward, to their present tropical latitudes.
The Arctic Home commences with the statement: “If we trace the history of any nation backwards into the past, we come at last to a period of myths and traditions which eventually fade away into impenetrable darkness.”
Tilak then refers to the endeavours made by mythologists in order to illumine the pre-historic period and points out that they assumed that the physical and geographical surroundings of prehistoric man were not different from those of present day. He points out how, owing to this erroneous hypothesis, attempts were made to elucidate every Vedic legend in the light of the ‘storm’ or the ‘dawn’ theory, and it was found that the Vedas could only be defectively understood.
Tilak next points out how as a result of fresh discoveries in archaeology, geology and palaentology, the conclusions of the philologists and mythologists had to be revised and the theory of succeeding migrations into Europe from a common home of the Aryan race in Central Asia had to be given up.
After stating that the question of the primeval home of the Aryan race still remains unsolved, Tilak concludes the first chapter with the remarks: “The North Pole is already considered by several eminent scientific men as the most likely place where plant and animal life first originated; and I believe it can be satisfactorily shown that there is enough positive evidence in the most ancient books of the Aryan race, the Vedas and Avesta to prove that the oldest home of the Aryan people was somewhere in regions roundabout the North Pole,”
In the concluding chapter, ‘Primitive Aryan Culture and Religion,’ the attestations of the theory of the Arctic Home are summed up, the ancient Vedic chronology and calendar are examined and the current views regarding primitive Aryan culture and religion are discussed.
The theological views regarding the origin and character of the Vedas are further summarised.
Tilak then reiterates his claim that many points in Vedic interpretation and Vedic mythology were rationally explained by the theory of the Arctic home in inter-glacial times.
In conclusion, Tilak remarks: “In these days of progress when the question of the primitive human culture and civilisation is approached and investigated from so many different sides, the science of Vedic interpretation cannot stand isolated or depend exclusively on linguistic or grammatical analysis; and we have simply followed the spirit of the time in seeking to bring about the co-ordination of the latest scientific results with the traditions contained in the oldest books of the Aryan racebooks which have been deservedly held in the highest esteem and preserved by our ancestors, amidst insurmountable difficulties, with religious enthusiasm ever since the beginning of the present age.”
Today many of the Sanskrit academics construe the Vedic hymns in an approach different from that to Tilak.
In this respect, Dr. R. N. Dandekar, for instance, observes:
“Linguistic, archaeological, anthropological and cultural-historical evidence entitles us to assume that the North Kirghis Steppes between the Urals and the Altai, was the home of the Indo-European.... This was the primary Urheimat. From this region the first major migration started in south-eastern direction — the immigrants ultimately settling in the Balkh region, before their further migrations.... We know that Aryan speech and religion had already been assuming noble forms, ever since the Proto-Aryans migrated to and settled in the region around Balkh. After the stray secondary migrations of some of the Proto-Aryan tribes... the remaining stock of the Proto-Aryans continued to live in that region for some centuries, and developed their unique culture and civilisation. This was the Proto-Indo-Iranian period. The Vedic ‘Mantras’ in their primary form, came to be composed, and the distinctive Soma-ritual was evolved.... Indians gradually moved eastward into the land of seven rivers, conquering... the tribes of the Dasas. Ultimately by about 1900 B.C. these Vedic Aryans advanced where they came across what was perhaps the last phase of Harappa civilisation.”
Among the critics of The Arctic Home was Narayanrao Bhavanrao Pavgi, a close friend of Tilak. In the ‘Reminiscences of Tilak’ he writes: “Lokmanya showed to me the important part of his manuscript of The Arctic Home, but I was left unconvinced.” Pavgi also delivered, on 19th May 1906, a lecture, over which Tilak presided. In the course of his speech, he unequivocally stated his points of difference with Tilak. In 1915 he wrote the book Aryawartic Home and its Arctic Colony in which he tried to refute Tilak’s thesis.
Tilak, who possessed a researcher’s ethics, always wanted to perk up on his work. Dr. S. K. Belvalkar, the renowned Sanskrit scholar, in the Reminiscences wrote: “While discussing the Arctic theory Tilak said: ‘I very much want to publish the second edition of The Arctic Home in the Vedas but before that, it is necessary to study some recently published works on Scandinavian mythology. ... If you come to Sinhgad for a month, we shall discuss the subject and make the necessary modifications in the second edition....’ Tilak had also ‘agreed to give in the second edition a chronological history of Vedic and post-Vedic literature.”
The quandary of fixing the period of Vedic civilisatìon had aroused the interest of a number of oriental scholars. It was acknowledged that the Veda ‘took us to the beginning of the Aryan civilisation’ and as Max Müller put it, “that for a study of man, or if you like, for a study of Aryan humanity, there is nothing in the world equal in importance with it.” Max Müller followed the literary or linguistic method for ascertaining the age of the Vedas, divided the Vedic literature into four periods the Chhandas, Mantra, Brahmana and Sutra, each presupposing the preceding period. He maintained that the last, i.e., Sutra, was prior “if not to the origin, at least to the spreading and political ascendancy of Buddhism,” i.e., 4th century B.C. and by assigning two hundred years for each period, he arrived at the conclusion that the Vedic hymns were composed at the latest at about 1200 B.C.
Tilak’s imprisonment in 1898 came as a blessing in disguise as it enabled him to dive deep in to the subject of his choice. Max Müller, sent him a copy of the Rigveda he had edited. While Tilak was deeply absorbed in the study of it, the idea about the original home of the Aryans, dawned on his mind as in a flash.
The event can best be described in the words of Poincare: “Most striking at first is this appearance of sudden illumination a manifest sign of long, unconscious prior work.” The hymn (Many days passed before the Sun-rise) strengthened his belief in his theory. V. G. Ketkar in the ‘Reminiscences of Tilak’ writes: “After his release from prison, as he was once talking to a learned friend, he remarked: ‘I was very happy on the night when I could explain correctly the hymn. The friend naturally said, ‘How can there be any happiness in prison?’ At this Tilak said, ‘You won’t understand it unless you go to prison.”
This was, however, only the beginning of a brilliant idea. Tilak had the scientific attitude necessary for carrying on research and would have discarded his theory if he had not come across the corroborative evidence. After his release he devoted his spare time to the pursuit of this inquiry and in particular studied geology.
Tilak wrote The Arctic Home in the Vedas in the summer of 1902. During this period he was staying at his bungalow on. Singhad Gopal Raoji Gogte, who was Tilak’s writer during the period, in the Reminiscences stated: “Tilak dictated to me hectically for fourteen to fifteen hours a day. Sometimes he was so much absorbed in some new idea that I had to wait for hours before he resumed the work of dictation.... He hardly spoke to anyone in the house.... The work continued almost to the last moment of our leaving Sinhgad.... He was happy when the book was completed.”
To be impartial in our analysis, with due reverence to the intellect of Balwantrao Gangadhar Tilak, we can track down the following points:
1) Tilak enlarged and reinterpreted the work of European Indologists, invalidating disagreements that European culture developed earlier and more swiftly than Indian culture, asserting the sophistication of Vedic culture.
2) The Arctic Home of the Vedas opened with a dialogue of his obligations to Max Müller. Max Müller’s work on the Rig Veda and the history of Sanskrit literature, was not only a prime reference point for Tilak, but the former also provided him with material and personal backing. Tilak made good use of the latest Orientalist research, supplementing Max Müller with Rhys and Taylor’s works on Aryan foundations and Warren’s study on ancient languages. Most prominently, Tilak extended the image of a Vedic Golden Age created by Jones, Colebrooke and Max Müller, using it to emphasize the predominance, dynamism and supremacy of Indo-Aryan culture.
3) Tilak’s findings of Arctic pole are based on inferences he drew from some conjectures rooted in Avesta, Vedas and the Glacial period. Tilak associated the mention of Aryan homeland ‘Airyanem vaejo’ in Avesta that was destroyed by snow and cold climate to a livable, warm North pole that got habitable by the end of the glacial period.
4) He takes the statement from Avesta and Brahmana that God’s one day is our year, and tends to correspond it to a polar day, “the ancient home of gods.”
5) Tilak cites mantras that talk of extended nights and dawn that doesn’t arrive as indicated by expectations of the poet and takes them to entail extended nights of pole for granted. He connects the uneasiness in the dying at ‘Pitryaana’ with the conviction of uneasiness in dying at night, and thus tells that the customs came up because of an Arctic past where it was hard to carry corpse in night (the stretched six month period, pitryaana).
I choose to bring to a close with the remarks of two dons of Indian historical academia:
Dr. Dandekar had observed in a personal interview: “In spite of certain limitations, The Arctic Home of Lokmanya Tilak contains many brilliant hints and suggestions and could certainly be called an inspired piece of research. It is to be appreciated for its rich possibilities rather than for its actual conclusions.”
Aurobindo Ghose noted that: “Mr. Tilak in his Arctic Home in the Vedas has accepted the general conclusions of European scholarship, but by a fresh examination of the Vedic Dawn, the figure of the Vedic cows and the astronomical data of the hymns, has established at least a strong probability that the Aryan races descended originally from the Arctic regions in the glacial period.”
Judging by the contemporary promoted consciousness of the ‘Aryan-invasion theory construct’, we tend to consider Tilak’s work as a simple exercise of academics. Nevertheless, one would do well to remember that it was a book began to be written under rigorous circumstances of incarceration.
An interesting book, which offers a fairly attention-grabbing theory about such an extensively-debated topic!
Grab a copy if you choose.