The Tudor dynasty of late medieval England is popular with novelists across the range: from the ‘literary’ end of the market - Hilary Mantel’s Wolf Hall; to popular romance: Phillipa Gregory’s The Other Boleyn Girl; to children’s novels: Julia Jarman’s The Time Travelling Cat and the Tudor Treasure. The Tudor period was marked by conflict, religious turmoil and brutal and bloody regimes. It therefore offers great scope for writers of crime fiction, as the success of S J Sansom and Rory Clements demonstrates.
S J Parris is another crime writer exploring this period. Sacrilege is the third book in her Giordano Bruno series, set in the England of Elizabeth Tudor. Bruno is an Italian refugee from the continental inquisition, an apostate monk who has come to England to live in its more enlightened (for the period) climate. He is a spy for Sir Frances Walsingham, Principal Secretary to Elizabeth I. Parris has thus placed her protagonist at the centre of the political and religious intrigues of Elizabethan times.
Parris, in her previous novels, confronts real historical events: the Babington plot, and the attempts by the Howard family to put the Catholic Mary Stuart, Queen of Scotland on the English throne. Sacrilege is based on more personal events for Bruno: Sophia Underhill, a woman who appears in the first Bruno novel, Heresy, returns to his life. Sophia is now a widow in flight from the charge that she murdered her brutal husband.
Bruno travels to Canterbury, the scene of the murder and also the site of the murder of Thomas Becket, a Catholic martyr from the time of the Plantagenet dynasty, to try and solve the murder and save Sophia from trial, the inevitable verdict of guilt, and execution by burning. Disguised as a man, Sophia travels with him, and Bruno has to hide her with sympathisers in Canterbury where she is in grave danger of being recognised.
So far, so good. However, the book contains some significant weaknesses. The plot is over-complicated, with conspiracy, child murder and treachery all coming together in a complex strand that is not completely unravelled, and relies on the coincidental juxtaposition of crimes that allows Bruno to reveal a conspiracy at the same time as solving the murder he has come to Canterbury to investigate. Sophia travels with Bruno, but vanishes from the plot, apart from occasional references to the importance of secrecy, until she is needed again for plot development. This results in a slowing down of the action that makes the novel sag in places.
Writers of historical fiction have the problem of recreating the ‘voice’ of the time, while making their characters’ words accessible to modern readers. Putting modern English in their mouths is acceptable – after all, this is what they were speaking: the contemporary language of their period. There are some dissonances here. Parris uses the slightly formal tone many writers adopt to represent earlier forms of English, but this is inconsistent, and is sometimes coupled uncomfortably with 21st century idiom in a way that pulls the reader out of the Tudor world she is trying to recreate. Phrases such as ‘not your ordinary churchman,’ ‘you lot,’ and ‘you look rough,’ sit uncomfortably with ‘filthy Spanish dog,’ and ‘whoreson.’ This kind of juxtaposition is more reminiscent of Black Adder, or even Carry On, Henry than of historical fiction.
This intrusion of the 21st century continues in the way the characters are presented. The main protagonists are too much modern figures. Sophia, without any background to make this believable, is a feminist before her time. She does not ring true as a character, and it is hard for the reader to empathise with Bruno’s passion for her, even though we are asked to accept that he puts his own life and the lives of others at risk for her.
A repeated sub-plot throughout the series is a lost book ascribed to Hermes Trismegistus (which is not very lost as it has a habit of popping up in unexpected places and then being mislaid again by Bruno). So far, this sub-plot has not developed beyond this point and Parris should move it on or bring it to an end.
Sacrilege is, at the very least, readable, with dark Tudor set-pieces (plague, secret crypts, dark, narrow streets), but Parris, who has clearly done her research, might benefit from placing her characters more in the day to day world of Elizabethan England, rather than concentrating on over-complex plots that do not entirely convince.