What do you think?
Rate this book


Paperback
First published August 1, 1990
#1: Those flowers are NOT vaginas, they were NOT intended to be, O'Keeffe herself SAID SO, so STOP IT.Me, personally (uppity self-aggrandizement incoming, sorry), I think, yeah, okay, that flower sure does look like a vagina, but that's not all. And yes, I do think O'Keeffe was aware that her vagina flowers look like, well, what they were. I think what she was trying to say when she railed against people whose deepest (heh) takeaway from her art was its yonic tendency was that although the flower paintings might look like vaginas, that's not all they are. O'Keeffe didn't want to be defined as "the vagina artist" (although personally I think that would be awesome, like Ana Mendieta in a way...).
#2: Regardless of what Georgia may have SAID, if she didn't want people to think her flower paintings looked like vaginas, then maybe she shouldn't have made them look so much like vaginas.