Great Book - relevant to each of us, as everyone is a patient.
Humanity and interpersonal communication seem to be the theme of this book, especially for the purposes of health communication.
Dr. His uses his own cardio illness to review the medical profession’s attitude toward patients, and in this case, the way it communicates or doesn’t communicate with them. He does this as an insider now on the outside, but with some pull, “I am a physician, I understand the language spoken by physicians,… (p.89).”
As a medical professional, he learned to treat the disease and not that patient, as “[their] time was much too valuable to be spent bantering with patients,” [p.6], noting that “[n]o doctors asked the questions that needed to be asked: What has this disease done to your life?” [p.6-7].
He noted the “indifference (p.87) that young doctors have toward discussing matters of substance – treatments and outcomes – with the patient, even though it is in the Medical Center’s patient bill of rights or manifesto (p.182).
Upon requesting to speak to the surgeon prior to signing the consent for his second surgery, the response by the chief resident was one of anger and then indifference, “‘Okay,’ he said in a way that made it clear this part of the conversation was over as far as he was concerned (p100).”
One of the communicative means of control and distance physicians keep over and from patients is by naming diseases. The naming gives control to both sides, doctor and patient, as Dr. Hsi noted on p. 19, “If nothing else, identifying [my symptoms – aortic regurgitation] gave me some degree of control.”
Doctors, he noted on p. 72, for example, do not treating those they cannot name, “my cardiologist said doctors who don’t understand something tend to blame the patient for the symptoms. He said he found it common for the physicians to simply think the patient was wrong.”
Furthermore, they blame the patient if they cannot identify a disease responsible for symptoms, “‘We don’t have a problem,’ they tell the patient. ‘You have a problem. We’ve done all the tests. We can’t find anything wrong.’”
He notes that identifying things with lingo permeates through to nurses and even patient advocates, “in terms of efficiency and precision, an argument can be made for the use of jargon in any field, but efficiency is not improved when used as a device to cancel our the ‘bother’ of treating patients as whole human beings rather than a disparate collection of broken parts (p.104).”
To the cardio-thoracic surgeon known as “God,” “I was a valve,” Hsi noted. “But once the surgery was over, it seemed ‘God’ had moved on to the next case (p.134).”
He did find a doctor there, the cardiologist, who examined him prior to his departure from the Medical Center after his second surgery. “”[She was] everything a patient could ask for in a doctor. She asked questions: How are you doing? How is your family? What has this done to you?”
A corollary to the hierarchy of medical professionals is that the lower on the totem pole, the more the staff person connects with the patient.
• “[W]e remained mute in the presence of the physician (p.46).”
• The cardio-thoracic surgeon known as “God” “…showed little interest in nay of the events that led up to my arrival at the Medical Center… (p.105).”
• At the time of his second surgery with “God,” the cardio-thoracic surgeon ‘s “…demeanor was markedly different from the first surgery, when he caem into [Hsi’s] room and delivered a canned performance made memorable only by its rote, mechanical nature. When he left the room this time, [Hsi] was struck at how these few minutes of communication changed everything for me, the patient. My mood was elevated, I was elated (p.180).”
• During the visit to his hospital room by two cardiologists just prior to his third surgery, “[N]either cardiologist spoke to [his wife, a surgical nurse], neither acknowledged her, neither so much as introduced himself to her.”
• When Hsi was having trouble breathing while intubated after the second surgery, his wife practically was disdained by the doctors. “…Beth knew why. She gently made a suggestion. The two surgery residents not so gently blew her off (p.181).”
• “Nurses work hard to empathize with the patients (p. 33).”
• “When the patient census is low, nurses get to do what they went into nursing to do – comfort and care for the sick. They have the time to answer anxious questions and explain what they are doing (p.88).”
• “I once spoke to medical students who argued that the physician shouldn’t get too close to the patient. They had heard this in some vague place, spoken by some vague person (p.74).”
Dr. Hsi changed his manner of working as a physician, as a result of being a patient.
• “I don’t believe doctors talk to patients about [the patient having no control over anything] (p.33)”
• “I swore to never again take lightly a patient’s complaint about side effects (p. 20).”
• “Our [his physician brother’s and his] conversation eventually changed the way I practiced medicine. For the first time in my life, I had let my guard down. I had talked openly of vulnerability and weakness and fear (p.43).”
• “It remains remarkable to me that no healthcare provider ever asked how we were coping with the burden imposed by the complicated care I required (p.64).”