Quite good, though suggest picking up from the first chapter on O'Connor and going on through Percy, Updike and DeVries. The first chapters on Neiburh and Barth were good enough, but were relatively unecessery set-ups for the evaluation of the assessment of the works of the 4 fiction writers mentioned above. Particularly interesting to me were the Updike and DeVries chapters, of whom I knew less about or had read less of than either O'Connor or Percy. Bottom line - if you are interested in spiritual/theological sensibilities (defined VERY broadly here) in modern literature, then this is a quite good treatment. I drop 2 stars from it because the initial chapters were not necessary, and Wood doesn't convincingly define the presence of the comic in the 4 writers, which is what he set out to do. Bottom line, forget the title or Wood's purported thesys, and just enjoy his quite good assessment of the meaning in the authors' work.