What do you think?
Rate this book
Viaţa între clădiri. Utilizările spaţiului public
Publicată pentru prima dată în 1971, cu scopul de a evidenţia neajunsurile curentului formalist care domina arhitectura şi planificarea urbană în acea perioadă, cartea “Viaţa între clădiri” a fost completată, revizuită şi tradusă, de-a lungul anilor, în peste 15 limbi, fiind adăugate materiale şi noi ilustraţii, în acord cu dezvoltarea curentă a centrelor urbane. Mesajul a rămas însă acelaşi: “aveţi grijă de oameni şi de valoroasa viaţă urbană care se desfăşoară între clădiri”. La rădăcina acestei cercetări stă una dintre definiţiile naturii umane, omul ca fiinţă socială, născut cu dorinţa şi nevoia de a interacţiona cu celălalt. Acestă direcţie duce înspre “legea” pe care designeri şi arhitecţii oraşelor trebuie să o respecte: spaţul public trebuie să interacţioneze cu oamenii, trebuie să fie accesibil, folositor, relaxant, primitor.
200 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1971
153 people are currently reading
5409 people want to read
About the author
Jan Gehl
14 books248 followersJan Gehl is a Danish architect and urban design consultant based in Copenhagen and whose career has focused on improving the quality of urban life by re-orienting city design towards the pedestrian and cyclist.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 73 reviews
June 15, 2021
About a week ago, someone liked one of my reviews and after I clicked onto their profile I noticed they had reviewed this book. I’ve been fascinated by the whole idea of place and space for a very long time. Well, that and Goffman’s symbolic interactionism – the idea that many of our interactions can be understood as little dramas. So, this seemed right up my alley, so to speak.
Well, if Goffman liked dramas, the thing to notice is that dramas happen on stages with props, and, as Chekov liked to say, if there is a gun on a wall at the start of the play, it had better have gone off by the third act. Items on a stage are meant to be essential, you could imagine them as being inanimate actors in the play – which is more or less the central idea of New Materialism. All the same, this book is easier to read than most New Materialism.
So, what about all of the things that appear in a city street? You could shrug this off by saying, well, a city street isn’t really a stage. But the thing is that both are artifacts – they are made by humans so as to serve human purposes. All the same, when we think of cities we are much more likely to think about buildings than we are the spaces between them. And the author is at pains to say that the spaces between buildings are often much more interesting (and important) to the life of the city, than buildings. He even says at one point that you can have buildings of fascinating shapes and any or multiple colours of concrete and that hardly matters at all if the spaces between the buildings are poorly designed.
Three things happen in the spaces between buildings – necessary activities, optional activities and social activities. These are, or can be, overlapping categories, but they are still useful to think with all the same. No matter how bad the space between buildings is, you are still going to have to go out into them for necessary activities – to buy food, or go to work, say. Some social activities are going to fit into the necessary group too category too, but obviously, optional activities are going to be strongly impacted by the quality of the space, with you being much more likely to spend time in that space if it is welcoming.
So, what does welcoming mean? Most of this book is about answering that question. And some of the things said – oh, and shown, as there are lots of photos of street scenes – seemed surprisingly counter-intuitive to me. For example, he says at one point that most streetscapes would be improved if there was less space in them – I really would have expected the opposite.
He spends quite a lot of this book discussing human physical characteristics, and how these impact on whether the spaces between buildings are appropriate to human interactions. How far away can someone be for us to be able to hear them? How far away they can be before even if we can hear them, we can’t really sustain a conversation? And bizarrely, how close do they have to be before we feel forced to stop having a conversation with them? I’m not sure if you’ve ever noticed this, but you can be chatting away furiously with someone walking up to a lift, but then stop speaking immediately while you are in the lift. Space matters – and it certainly isn’t due to it being hard to hear what is being said in a lift – quite the opposite, in fact.
And then there is the fact we never see stuff that is above a certain height in streetscapes, not least since we generally walk with our heads tilted slightly to the ground, as Ani DiFranco says, ‘when I look down, I just miss all the good stuff, when I look up, I just trip over things’. Or the fact that we have a preference for the shortest route between two points, even if it isn’t the easiest way to get there.
Our senses have evolved to be useful to us at particular scales, and walking pace matches most of those scales for us. Walking pace means we can see all of the details in an urban space that certainly can’t be seen while driving through them in a motor car at 70km/h. In the car, signs need to be huge, barriers (of one form or another) need to exist between the driver and pedestrians, and noise from the cars means talking becomes next to impossible for people on the streets. Parents hold onto children’s hands in such spaces and so children are less engaged in these places too.
I had never really thought about how people interact with large open spaces before. Generally, we start off by sticking to the edges of space – so, increasing the number of edges is often a good way to increase the amount of human interaction with that space.
Inevitably, I kept thinking about my own city while reading this. Melbourne has often been voted the world’s most liveable city – this isn’t nearly as impressive as it sounds. Really, it is something the Economist magazine does for its readers, it being a kind of competition to decide how much you should be compensated if you have to live somewhere else. You know, if your company sent you to live in Yemen or Gaza, you would probably want some sort of danger money to make it worthwhile. Whereas, Melbourne is relatively politically stable, has quite nice drinking water, lots private schools and legalised prostitution, all of which are the things a business man away from home needs to tick off their list.
When Melbourne’s streets were planned, the governor at the time demanded that the Little Streets – between the main ones – should be made narrower than the planner had intended. The planner wanted them wider, because they believed at the time that disease was spread by bad smells. There was a fight, and the governor won. The governor wanted more housing blocks and less public road, since there was money pouring in from one and money disappearing due to the other. But this meant Melbourne inadvertently is an example of both the too much and too little space discussed here – and what he says basically works – the main streets are far too wide for you to get a sense of what is going on on the other side of the street – but this is certainly not true of the little streets. Some of the little streets have had traffic taken out from them and have then become virtual outdoor restaurants. There is a liveliness to these streets that you don’t find so much in the main streets, even when these too have been turned into malls. And it isn’t a shortage of people on the main streets – there is often more than enough people there.
The author makes the point that we are endlessly fascinated by our fellow humans. So, the seats in a square or at a park that are most likely to be used as the ones that let those sitting on them see the flow of people around them – rather than, say, a very attractive flower bed. People will stand for ages watching other people work on a building site, but might not look at all when no one is working there – when, if you think about it, there is probably almost as much to see both times. This is also true of those people you sometimes see drawing artworks in chalk on the pavement. As the author says, we will stop and watch them drawing, but might walk over their artwork once the artist has gone for the day.
Human interaction both draws us towards it, but also can require courage to get us to make that first step. And here the author talks about the benefits of private, public and semi-public spaces – for example, having a front-garden in your property where you can ‘tend to the garden’ – that is, have a reason for being there – while also allowing chances to occur where you can speak with neighbours and with people passing by. The book says that Venice is a particularly human city, since it has so many features that make incidental human interactions much likely. He says at one point that just about every object in the city of Venice can be used as a seat.
This is a remarkably short book, but it is packed with things I’d never thought about before that made me think about what makes the spaces between buildings either work or not. It’s the sort of book that will come to annoy you while you are out and about walking about your local neighbourhood – and, honestly, how could that not be a good thing?
Well, if Goffman liked dramas, the thing to notice is that dramas happen on stages with props, and, as Chekov liked to say, if there is a gun on a wall at the start of the play, it had better have gone off by the third act. Items on a stage are meant to be essential, you could imagine them as being inanimate actors in the play – which is more or less the central idea of New Materialism. All the same, this book is easier to read than most New Materialism.
So, what about all of the things that appear in a city street? You could shrug this off by saying, well, a city street isn’t really a stage. But the thing is that both are artifacts – they are made by humans so as to serve human purposes. All the same, when we think of cities we are much more likely to think about buildings than we are the spaces between them. And the author is at pains to say that the spaces between buildings are often much more interesting (and important) to the life of the city, than buildings. He even says at one point that you can have buildings of fascinating shapes and any or multiple colours of concrete and that hardly matters at all if the spaces between the buildings are poorly designed.
Three things happen in the spaces between buildings – necessary activities, optional activities and social activities. These are, or can be, overlapping categories, but they are still useful to think with all the same. No matter how bad the space between buildings is, you are still going to have to go out into them for necessary activities – to buy food, or go to work, say. Some social activities are going to fit into the necessary group too category too, but obviously, optional activities are going to be strongly impacted by the quality of the space, with you being much more likely to spend time in that space if it is welcoming.
So, what does welcoming mean? Most of this book is about answering that question. And some of the things said – oh, and shown, as there are lots of photos of street scenes – seemed surprisingly counter-intuitive to me. For example, he says at one point that most streetscapes would be improved if there was less space in them – I really would have expected the opposite.
He spends quite a lot of this book discussing human physical characteristics, and how these impact on whether the spaces between buildings are appropriate to human interactions. How far away can someone be for us to be able to hear them? How far away they can be before even if we can hear them, we can’t really sustain a conversation? And bizarrely, how close do they have to be before we feel forced to stop having a conversation with them? I’m not sure if you’ve ever noticed this, but you can be chatting away furiously with someone walking up to a lift, but then stop speaking immediately while you are in the lift. Space matters – and it certainly isn’t due to it being hard to hear what is being said in a lift – quite the opposite, in fact.
And then there is the fact we never see stuff that is above a certain height in streetscapes, not least since we generally walk with our heads tilted slightly to the ground, as Ani DiFranco says, ‘when I look down, I just miss all the good stuff, when I look up, I just trip over things’. Or the fact that we have a preference for the shortest route between two points, even if it isn’t the easiest way to get there.
Our senses have evolved to be useful to us at particular scales, and walking pace matches most of those scales for us. Walking pace means we can see all of the details in an urban space that certainly can’t be seen while driving through them in a motor car at 70km/h. In the car, signs need to be huge, barriers (of one form or another) need to exist between the driver and pedestrians, and noise from the cars means talking becomes next to impossible for people on the streets. Parents hold onto children’s hands in such spaces and so children are less engaged in these places too.
I had never really thought about how people interact with large open spaces before. Generally, we start off by sticking to the edges of space – so, increasing the number of edges is often a good way to increase the amount of human interaction with that space.
Inevitably, I kept thinking about my own city while reading this. Melbourne has often been voted the world’s most liveable city – this isn’t nearly as impressive as it sounds. Really, it is something the Economist magazine does for its readers, it being a kind of competition to decide how much you should be compensated if you have to live somewhere else. You know, if your company sent you to live in Yemen or Gaza, you would probably want some sort of danger money to make it worthwhile. Whereas, Melbourne is relatively politically stable, has quite nice drinking water, lots private schools and legalised prostitution, all of which are the things a business man away from home needs to tick off their list.
When Melbourne’s streets were planned, the governor at the time demanded that the Little Streets – between the main ones – should be made narrower than the planner had intended. The planner wanted them wider, because they believed at the time that disease was spread by bad smells. There was a fight, and the governor won. The governor wanted more housing blocks and less public road, since there was money pouring in from one and money disappearing due to the other. But this meant Melbourne inadvertently is an example of both the too much and too little space discussed here – and what he says basically works – the main streets are far too wide for you to get a sense of what is going on on the other side of the street – but this is certainly not true of the little streets. Some of the little streets have had traffic taken out from them and have then become virtual outdoor restaurants. There is a liveliness to these streets that you don’t find so much in the main streets, even when these too have been turned into malls. And it isn’t a shortage of people on the main streets – there is often more than enough people there.
The author makes the point that we are endlessly fascinated by our fellow humans. So, the seats in a square or at a park that are most likely to be used as the ones that let those sitting on them see the flow of people around them – rather than, say, a very attractive flower bed. People will stand for ages watching other people work on a building site, but might not look at all when no one is working there – when, if you think about it, there is probably almost as much to see both times. This is also true of those people you sometimes see drawing artworks in chalk on the pavement. As the author says, we will stop and watch them drawing, but might walk over their artwork once the artist has gone for the day.
Human interaction both draws us towards it, but also can require courage to get us to make that first step. And here the author talks about the benefits of private, public and semi-public spaces – for example, having a front-garden in your property where you can ‘tend to the garden’ – that is, have a reason for being there – while also allowing chances to occur where you can speak with neighbours and with people passing by. The book says that Venice is a particularly human city, since it has so many features that make incidental human interactions much likely. He says at one point that just about every object in the city of Venice can be used as a seat.
This is a remarkably short book, but it is packed with things I’d never thought about before that made me think about what makes the spaces between buildings either work or not. It’s the sort of book that will come to annoy you while you are out and about walking about your local neighbourhood – and, honestly, how could that not be a good thing?
December 5, 2021
Το βιβλίο, αν και γράφτηκε πριν 40 και κάτι χρόνια, και αφορά κυρίως τη Δανία, παραμένει επίκαιρο -και αναγκαίο για την Ελλάδα-, αν σκεφτείς τους δημόσιους χώρους των ελληνικών πόλεων (και κυρίως των μεγάλων). Ο Gehl ξεκινάει από μια βασική αρχή: η *πραγματική* ζωή σε μια πόλη βρίσκεται ανάμεσα στα κτίρια, εκεί όπου οι άνθρωποι έρχονται σε -μικρότερη ή μεγαλύτερη- επαφή μεταξύ τους και λαμβάνουν χώρα οι υπαίθριες αναγκαίες, προαιρετικές και κοινωνικές δραστηριότητες.
Χρησιμοποιώντας *πολλές* φωτογραφίες και όχι περίπλοκη γλώσσα, μεταφέρει με πολύ απλά τρόπο τις γνώσεις και τις παρατηρήσεις του όχι μόνο γύρω από το urban planning αλλά και την ανθρώπινη ψυχολογία. Έτσι, ο αναγνώστης δεν χρειάζεται να έχει ντοκτορά ή να φτιάχνει τον έναν καφέ μετά τον άλλο για να κρατήσει ανοιχτά τα μάτια.
Η ζωή ανάμεσα στα κτήρια είναι γραμμένη και σε μικρές παραγράφους, με σημειώσεις σαν μεσότιτλους στο πλάι τους, κάτι που ιδανικό για όσους έχουν attention span. Ίσως όχι και για όσους περίεργους θέλουν να κρατάνε οι ίδιοι σημειώσεις όπου οι ίδιοι κρίνουν απαραίτητο, και όχι σχεδόν παντού, όπως η γραφ...γκουχ γκουχ). Με λίγα λόγια, χρήσιμο βιβλίο για όλους όσους τους απασχολεί ο δημόσιος χώρος και η θέση τους σε αυτόν.
Χρησιμοποιώντας *πολλές* φωτογραφίες και όχι περίπλοκη γλώσσα, μεταφέρει με πολύ απλά τρόπο τις γνώσεις και τις παρατηρήσεις του όχι μόνο γύρω από το urban planning αλλά και την ανθρώπινη ψυχολογία. Έτσι, ο αναγνώστης δεν χρειάζεται να έχει ντοκτορά ή να φτιάχνει τον έναν καφέ μετά τον άλλο για να κρατήσει ανοιχτά τα μάτια.
Η ζωή ανάμεσα στα κτήρια είναι γραμμένη και σε μικρές παραγράφους, με σημειώσεις σαν μεσότιτλους στο πλάι τους, κάτι που ιδανικό για όσους έχουν attention span. Ίσως όχι και για όσους περίεργους θέλουν να κρατάνε οι ίδιοι σημειώσεις όπου οι ίδιοι κρίνουν απαραίτητο, και όχι σχεδόν παντού, όπως η γραφ...γκουχ γκουχ). Με λίγα λόγια, χρήσιμο βιβλίο για όλους όσους τους απασχολεί ο δημόσιος χώρος και η θέση τους σε αυτόν.
September 1, 2011
i read this to the end, without skipping even a paragraph and its not a fiction book so i guess this means life between buildings was a very interesting book! its packed with useful information about public spaces and people's behaviours, surveys, facts and suggestions. the book is well written, with no excess information, lots of pictures to accompany the examples and is separated in smaller parts that consist of 2-4 paragraphs (very useful for people with small attention span myself included). i highly recommend it if you are looking for a book about the connections between people and architecture!
October 11, 2021
Καλύτερα πρώτος στην πόλη! Τα του Καίσαρος τω Καίσαρι και μαλακίες :p
https://pepperlines.blogspot.com/2021...
https://pepperlines.blogspot.com/2021...
Read
October 18, 2023Algjör þrusunauðsyn fyrir öll með vott af áhuga á borgarskipulagi. Að lesa hana var svolítið eins og að læra jarðfræði. Maður situr inni í góðum stól með nefið milli síðna, svo þegar maður stígur út þá allt í einu skilur maður umhverfið. Kunni ótrúlega mikið að meta athafnir ókunnugs fólks fyrir – enda einbúi – en núna er ég miklu næmari fyrir þeim. Æðisleg breyting finnst mér! Tek til baka fyrstu setninguna, þetta er þrusunauðsyn fyrir öll sem búa í BORG!
December 14, 2015
One of the true masters of down-to-earth city planning. You will never be able to walk through a modernist concrete wasteland again without thinking: "Why? Why so devoid of details, logical paths, places to meet, sit, walk" etc. And no, the answer is not always lack of funds. Some planners and builders just love building fortresses...
June 7, 2021
Public spaces are transient and owned by none. Populated in the day, some lingering figures at night... but what exactly makes them so desirable? Or with an associated fondness? Think streets, public furniture, plazas, lawns, squares — abroad and local.
What I love about this read was Ghel’s notations and dissections to the obvious (built space) and his cross-examinations to how we go about in public spaces (activity). I guess there is this focus on the beauty of the ordinary. The simplicity of space powered by people, that ‘even the modest form of contact of merely seeing and hearing or being near to others is apparently more rewarding and more demanding than the majority of all other attractions offered in the public spaces of cities.’ That designing for these interactions, especially cities historically driven by modernist urban planning principles, can make the in-between of city density and ambiguity desirable. The book makes you dwell in the human condition and the power of activity when two or more are simply gathered. Life between buildings demonstrates our need for contact and how we relate to each other in transient spaces. Apt when you think about it in the pandemic.
Also, short and concisely written, accessible to all and a good contemporary read (there are echos of Jane Jacob and William H. Whyte.).
What I love about this read was Ghel’s notations and dissections to the obvious (built space) and his cross-examinations to how we go about in public spaces (activity). I guess there is this focus on the beauty of the ordinary. The simplicity of space powered by people, that ‘even the modest form of contact of merely seeing and hearing or being near to others is apparently more rewarding and more demanding than the majority of all other attractions offered in the public spaces of cities.’ That designing for these interactions, especially cities historically driven by modernist urban planning principles, can make the in-between of city density and ambiguity desirable. The book makes you dwell in the human condition and the power of activity when two or more are simply gathered. Life between buildings demonstrates our need for contact and how we relate to each other in transient spaces. Apt when you think about it in the pandemic.
Also, short and concisely written, accessible to all and a good contemporary read (there are echos of Jane Jacob and William H. Whyte.).
October 29, 2024
Quite insightful.
Quotes
An alternative to these planning models is a more differentiated planning policy, in which social relations and practical advantages are evaluated from function to function and in which separation is only accepted when the disadvantages of assembling clearly outweigh the advantages.
When the quality of outdoor areas is good, optional activities occur with increasing frequency. Furthermore, as levels of optional activity rise, the number of social activities usually increases substantially.
Life between buildings is not merely pedestrian traffic or recreational or social activities. Life between buildings comprises the entire spectrum of activities, which combine to make communal spaces in cities and residential areas meaningful and attractive.
The importance of subdividing residential areas into smaller, better defined units as a link in more comprehensive hierarchical systems is increasingly recognized and is often used in new building projects.
In conclusion mention should be made of flowing, gentle transitions between the various categories of public spaces. It is expedient and often important that transitions, for example, between city street and residential group, are indicated physically, but at the same time it is important that the indication is not so firm a demarcation that it prevents contacts with the outside world.
isolation
walls
long distances
high speeds
multiple levels
orientation away from others
contact
no walls
short distances
low speeds
one level
orientation toward others
The rejection of monofunctional areas is a prerequisite for the integration of various types of people and activities. If the possibilities are to be redeemed, planning and design work at the medium and the very small scale are decisive factors.
Quotes
An alternative to these planning models is a more differentiated planning policy, in which social relations and practical advantages are evaluated from function to function and in which separation is only accepted when the disadvantages of assembling clearly outweigh the advantages.
When the quality of outdoor areas is good, optional activities occur with increasing frequency. Furthermore, as levels of optional activity rise, the number of social activities usually increases substantially.
Life between buildings is not merely pedestrian traffic or recreational or social activities. Life between buildings comprises the entire spectrum of activities, which combine to make communal spaces in cities and residential areas meaningful and attractive.
The importance of subdividing residential areas into smaller, better defined units as a link in more comprehensive hierarchical systems is increasingly recognized and is often used in new building projects.
In conclusion mention should be made of flowing, gentle transitions between the various categories of public spaces. It is expedient and often important that transitions, for example, between city street and residential group, are indicated physically, but at the same time it is important that the indication is not so firm a demarcation that it prevents contacts with the outside world.
isolation
walls
long distances
high speeds
multiple levels
orientation away from others
contact
no walls
short distances
low speeds
one level
orientation toward others
The rejection of monofunctional areas is a prerequisite for the integration of various types of people and activities. If the possibilities are to be redeemed, planning and design work at the medium and the very small scale are decisive factors.
October 6, 2024
A classic work that in a completely different way explains the same as Jane Jacobs did with 'Death and Life Of Great American Cities'. It shows what works, instead of what ought to work.
Great starting point to learn more about urbanism and urban design, and probably helps me having more meaningful conversations with my colleagues in the urban design department haha.
Great starting point to learn more about urbanism and urban design, and probably helps me having more meaningful conversations with my colleagues in the urban design department haha.
January 30, 2024
e zei dat ik dit moest lezen...
dit boek is perfect voor alle mensen die geloven dat (checks notes) 'mensen die in hun semi-open voortuin zitten om een praatje te maken met hun buren' DE hoeksteen van onze samenleving zijn
'It can be noted that many people [...] spend considerably more time on gardening than can be justified in any way for strictly horticultural purposes.'
'If neighbors came by, work was interrupted willingly in favor of a little chat across the fence. And when someone is doing something, there is always something to talk about: "Your roses are really doing well this year."'
dit boek is perfect voor alle mensen die geloven dat (checks notes) 'mensen die in hun semi-open voortuin zitten om een praatje te maken met hun buren' DE hoeksteen van onze samenleving zijn
'It can be noted that many people [...] spend considerably more time on gardening than can be justified in any way for strictly horticultural purposes.'
'If neighbors came by, work was interrupted willingly in favor of a little chat across the fence. And when someone is doing something, there is always something to talk about: "Your roses are really doing well this year."'
January 4, 2019
Að lesa þessa bók er eins og að fá „borgargleraugu“. Maður horfir í kringum sig og skilur umhverfið sitt mun betur. Það er allt sett í stærra og skýrara samhengi og það er ekki laust við að maður verðir tilfinningalegur gagnvart bersýnilega heimskulegum ákvörðunum sem bitna á öllum þeim sem þurfa að nota bílaborgina Reykjavík. Mæli með.
April 4, 2021
Var lengi að lesa hana en þetta er biblía urbanista. Ekki flóknara en svo. Mjög þörf umræða Gehl um borgina sem heimili okkar.
October 9, 2024
Urbanistické učenie, ktoré do stredu kladie človeka a jeho potreby. Určite odporúčam aj ľuďom mimo odboru. Začnete mesto vnímať inými očami.
June 22, 2015
This short book, amply illustrated with photographs, makes a strong case that design of public space can enhance or limit people's use of that space. Many of the observations seem obvious once made, but certainly I had never thought of them that way before - that people will do the things they have to do, no matter how bad the weather or the design - like go to work and go home from work - but the things they don't have to do are very subject to influence by environmental conditions (is the street pleasant, is it raining). There are echos of Jane Jacobs and William H. White. What makes a public place interesting and appealing is the people in it, and almost any place outside that is full of people - sitting, walking, eating, talking, listening to a musician on the corner - will be a lively and fun place to be. So Gehl argues that areas should be designed to get people outside and out of their cars as frequently as possible. If you drink your coffee on your front steps, and your house is close enough to the sidewalk or the street, you might end up talking to a neighbor, and after a few conversations you might feel that you know that person well enough to invite them for dinner or ask them to pick up your mail when you are gone next time. An insightful and very interesting book - highly recommended.
June 2, 2020
منذ بداية دراستي للعمارة ومع مطالعاتي في علم النفس والاجتماع نشأ لدي تصور أن الأماكن التي نحيا فيها لا بد وأن لها بصمة وأثر في تكوين شخصياتنا وعلاقاتنا الاجتماعية بل وربما تصوراتنا عن العالم والوجود حتى.. وكشخص عاش شخصيًا فشل التخطيط المدني والعمراني الحداثي وفشل نظام الإسكان والبيوت الذي لا يقيم للبشر والسكان والعلاقات الاجتماعية وزنًا فكتب يان غيل بالنسبة لي كنزٌ عظيم!
الكاتب يحلل الطبيعة البشرية وكيف نتعامل ونتحرك ونتفاعل مع بيئتنا وكيف أن على مدار التاريخ كانت المدن والقرى والمساحات تصمم تلقائيًا لتكون مناسبة للعلاقات البشرية حتى جائت الحقبة الحداثية الصناعية الاستهلاكية اللعينة وأصبح التركيز على المباني دون البشر والمدن دون السكان وصار المهم هو المباني الضخمة والضفادع الفخمة (على رأي طحالب).. جدير بالذكر أن بالنسبة لدول مستحدثة كالخليج فأنا عشت كثيرًا مما في هذا الكتاب وكتابات غيل عامةً وهذا أحد أسباب إعجابي الشديد به، وهو أنه لامس حياتي شخصيًا!
الكاتب يحلل الطبيعة البشرية وكيف نتعامل ونتحرك ونتفاعل مع بيئتنا وكيف أن على مدار التاريخ كانت المدن والقرى والمساحات تصمم تلقائيًا لتكون مناسبة للعلاقات البشرية حتى جائت الحقبة الحداثية الصناعية الاستهلاكية اللعينة وأصبح التركيز على المباني دون البشر والمدن دون السكان وصار المهم هو المباني الضخمة والضفادع الفخمة (على رأي طحالب).. جدير بالذكر أن بالنسبة لدول مستحدثة كالخليج فأنا عشت كثيرًا مما في هذا الكتاب وكتابات غيل عامةً وهذا أحد أسباب إعجابي الشديد به، وهو أنه لامس حياتي شخصيًا!
Read
November 24, 2016Świetna książka, która pokazuje jak mądrym planowaniem przestrzeni miejskiej można zachęcić ludzi do spacerowania, spędzania czasu na zewnątrz, a nie przemykania między budynkami. Dużo ilustracji i zdjęć, które stanowią świetne przykłady
December 31, 2019
upplýsandi bók sem minnir mann á að mannlegt borgarskipulag sé krafa og réttur fólks sem býr í einhverskonar þéttbýli. einstaklega fróðleg um alls kyns smáatriði sem maður hefur ekki komið auga á fyrir lestur bókarinnar. mæli með fyrir öll þau sem hafa áhuga á borgarskipulagi og lífvænlegum borgum.
March 1, 2019
Jan explains how can architects make people come out of their homes through urban planning. Amply illustrated with many relevant pictures.
December 16, 2022
An articulate and usefully specific book which analyses public space and what makes some designs more appealing to occupy than others.
February 18, 2024
kanskje i overkant fornuftig å lese dansk faglitteratur før jeg i det hele tatt har fått skoleplass, men var faktisk interessant!
April 21, 2022
One of the principal joys of reading is to discover the magic hidden in the seemingly banal things in life. I would've never cared to think twice about the intricacies of designing buildings and urban spaces, had it not been for this book. This serves as a gentle introduction to the fascinating study of how subtle differences in design of public spaces affect interactions on a much more broader scale.
June 23, 2024
Wowie this book was everything and more - I only wish I had a copy of my own so I could annotate it. It’s amazing how it still hold up decades after its release. The advice and truisms behind gehl’s work not only reinstate his position as a leading architect they remind us that places are ultimately about people. If you design a place with people first (how they move, how they’ll use the space, how they act, how they might use the space in unconventional ways) you will have somewhere people love to fill and guidebooks talk about. If you build buildings without thinking of people you’ll have a void lifeless pit. Great book and good when also thinking about William whytes thing about NYC
January 8, 2023
This mf spent way too much time just going into cities and staring at people. But honestly groundbreaking how he takes human physiology, proportions and psychology and puts it right smack in the center, acting as the basis for successful urban design. Ending was a bit shit.
September 26, 2022
This book was so awesome! Extremely easy to read, short with lots of instructive pictures, with simple but important points, that you probably know intuitively from how you use public space but wouldn’t know how to articulate. Also sometimes very sassy towards architects and planners :P
November 4, 2011
Another urban design classic. First published in 1971, Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space, as its name suggests, talks about the issues planners and designers should think about in creative active public spaces. That to promote active public life, we have to move away from planning approaches that focus on the building structure, its design, layout and functions, but views the space outside the building as an afterthought.
Gehl discusses the need to create invitations for people to enter the public realm and as important, to linger there. If we want multi-user spaces, spaces must first be multi-use. Gehl argues that planning approaches that try to separate different functions - residential, commercial, recreational, etc - into difference spaces breeds monotony and results in the desertification of public space. He also argues for taking a human-centred design approach that is in sync with how people perceive and interact with the world - for instance, streetscapes that that nestle comfortably within, rather than extend far beyond, our field of vision; routes and paths that we can comfortably navigate on foot; spaces that allow people to transition gradually from private to public spaces, etc.
What I loved about the book was its ability break down and explain what most of us might instinctively sense, but find difficult to articulate. Why some places like Copenhagen and Venice (even outside peak tourist season) have active street life but others look like ghost towns. Why some places are inherently attractive to people, drawing people to walk and linger in the space whereas others do not. The clean writing was a bonus.
Gehl discusses the need to create invitations for people to enter the public realm and as important, to linger there. If we want multi-user spaces, spaces must first be multi-use. Gehl argues that planning approaches that try to separate different functions - residential, commercial, recreational, etc - into difference spaces breeds monotony and results in the desertification of public space. He also argues for taking a human-centred design approach that is in sync with how people perceive and interact with the world - for instance, streetscapes that that nestle comfortably within, rather than extend far beyond, our field of vision; routes and paths that we can comfortably navigate on foot; spaces that allow people to transition gradually from private to public spaces, etc.
What I loved about the book was its ability break down and explain what most of us might instinctively sense, but find difficult to articulate. Why some places like Copenhagen and Venice (even outside peak tourist season) have active street life but others look like ghost towns. Why some places are inherently attractive to people, drawing people to walk and linger in the space whereas others do not. The clean writing was a bonus.
March 18, 2014
Quick read full of insights into how people approach public spaces. This is understandably a classic of urban planning, and is incredibly accessible. I loved how every spread had at least one photo, and often several supporting the text with observable evidence. The book seems like a nice complement to Jane Jacobs classic The Death and Life of Great American Cities, focusing more on the details of design that support the type of livable, walkable cities they both dream of.
September 20, 2021
Almost a step-by-step instructions manual for the livable city that still makes very important theoretical points. A must read for any student or practitioner for architecture and urbanism and, to be honest, for any politician as well. It goes straight to the point and the structure of the text is categorized to a fault. The images that accompany it are clear and enrich considerably the examples given throughout Jan Gehls’s different arguments.
Want to read
April 13, 2010study
July 10, 2024
First, some context: I picked up this book after visiting the Danish Architecture Center (DAC) in Copenhagen in 2023 (Copenhagen was the UNESCO World Capital of Architecture at the time). I marveled at how Danish architects and urban planners were creating cities meant to boost the quality of people's lives in concrete ways. Examples were the Finger Plan that left enough space for greenery even as the Copenhagen grew and how the city was designed so that there was always a public place to rest or relax (e.g. a park) within a 10-15 minute walk.
One architect/urban planner that stood out for me in the DAC exhibits was Jan Gehl, who turned the New York Times Square from just another car-filled intersection into the bustling pedestrian square and cultural icon it is today. His philosophy was all about making public spaces more appealing so that people would stay there longer, making those spaces conducive to various activities (e.g. conversations, hangouts, sports games, music festivals, Sunday markets, children playing, etc...) and social interactions. These activities become especially important in the modern age of loneliness and disconnection.
This book talked all about that with several examples and illustrations showing how that can be carried out... It also read like a textbook, which is great if you're a student looking to have a deep understanding of the building blocks and foundational design principles behind Jan Gehl's architectural philosophy.
But if you were looking for a light read like me, Soft City by David Sim is also based on those principles but discusses many of the same ideas in a more concise, concrete, and updated way. After all, Life Between Buildings was published in 1971, while Soft City was made in 2019. That's half a century's worth of changes and new insights not available to Gehl at the time. Sim also draws on his experiences at Gehl Architects, the urban research and design consulting firm founded by Gehl himself, who also provides the foreword in Soft City.
In short: Loved the ideas in the book, not so much the book's structure and tendency to repeat ideas or spend a long time on similar examples. Great for those who want a deep understanding of basic principles of urban design. For a light read, try Soft City instead.
One architect/urban planner that stood out for me in the DAC exhibits was Jan Gehl, who turned the New York Times Square from just another car-filled intersection into the bustling pedestrian square and cultural icon it is today. His philosophy was all about making public spaces more appealing so that people would stay there longer, making those spaces conducive to various activities (e.g. conversations, hangouts, sports games, music festivals, Sunday markets, children playing, etc...) and social interactions. These activities become especially important in the modern age of loneliness and disconnection.
This book talked all about that with several examples and illustrations showing how that can be carried out... It also read like a textbook, which is great if you're a student looking to have a deep understanding of the building blocks and foundational design principles behind Jan Gehl's architectural philosophy.
But if you were looking for a light read like me, Soft City by David Sim is also based on those principles but discusses many of the same ideas in a more concise, concrete, and updated way. After all, Life Between Buildings was published in 1971, while Soft City was made in 2019. That's half a century's worth of changes and new insights not available to Gehl at the time. Sim also draws on his experiences at Gehl Architects, the urban research and design consulting firm founded by Gehl himself, who also provides the foreword in Soft City.
In short: Loved the ideas in the book, not so much the book's structure and tendency to repeat ideas or spend a long time on similar examples. Great for those who want a deep understanding of basic principles of urban design. For a light read, try Soft City instead.
May 9, 2024
"Life Between Buildings" is a reference for architects and planners seeking to prioritize the human dimension in urban development. Despite its age, it continues to influence contemporary architectural practices. Gehl dissects the dynamics of public spaces, emphasizing their critical role in fostering social interaction, community cohesion, and overall urban vitality.
Gehl demonstrates a deep understanding of human behaviour and its interaction with the built environment. He advocates for a people-centric approach to urban planning, challenging conventional paradigms that prioritize vehicular traffic over pedestrian life. His emphasis on creating human-scale environments, characterized by walkable streets, welcoming plazas, and lively public squares, resonates profoundly in today's context of urban sprawl and social alienation.
He delves into the socio-economic implications of urban design decisions; and argues that well-designed public spaces not only enhance quality of life but also contribute to economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. By refocusing our attention on human needs and experiences, Gehl offers a vision for creating cities that are functional and delightful places to inhabit.
Gehl demonstrates a deep understanding of human behaviour and its interaction with the built environment. He advocates for a people-centric approach to urban planning, challenging conventional paradigms that prioritize vehicular traffic over pedestrian life. His emphasis on creating human-scale environments, characterized by walkable streets, welcoming plazas, and lively public squares, resonates profoundly in today's context of urban sprawl and social alienation.
He delves into the socio-economic implications of urban design decisions; and argues that well-designed public spaces not only enhance quality of life but also contribute to economic prosperity and environmental sustainability. By refocusing our attention on human needs and experiences, Gehl offers a vision for creating cities that are functional and delightful places to inhabit.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 73 reviews