THE REVISED EDITION AFTER THE ‘FIRE IN THE SKY’ MOVIE WAS RELEASED
Travis Walton wrote in the Preface to the 1996 edition of this 1978 book, “It was many years ago that I got out of a crew truck the national forest and ran toward a large glowing object hovering in the darkening Arizona sky. But when I made that fateful choice… I was leaving behind forever all semblance of a normal life, running headlong toward and experience so overwhelmingly mind-rending in its effect, to devastating in its aftermath, that my life would never---could never---be the same again… But what I didn’t know then, I think I know now… And with this new book I try to share those insights. When I first wrote ‘The Walton Experience’… the book which Paramount Pictures’ movie, ‘Fire In the Sky,’ is based on, I stated my desire that the book put the reader where we were when it happened. My hope was that if people could vicariously LIVE it… perhaps they could take a more open-minded and objective approach to their evaluation of it all.
“However, nothing approached the goal of allowing people to live someone else’s experience nearly so well as a movie. I think most people know better than to expect a documentary, and although some dramatic license was exercised, I believe that the movie succeeded in conveying the emotional essence of what we went through. Public response … satisfied my goal of imparting my experience on the gut level so I feel free now in this updating to emphasize other areas. I provide an accurate, undramatized chronicle of events, and I account for the main departures that the film took from what actually happened. I try to satisfy the interest which so many people have expressed concerning why, after all this time, I finally consented to a movie being made, and what the process of its creation was like.” (Pg. 4-5)
He admits, “The difficulties the interviewers had become even more understandable to me after I began this book. I had my own share of troubles in trying to achieve absolute accuracy---and I’m the one it happened to. In researching the facts, I found that people’s memories posed a problem… people tend to remember things a little differently as time goes y Ever if they remember something exactly as they experienced it, they might not have perceived it correctly… I dealt with this problem by eliminating versions that did not agree with the majority, and by checking with written records.” (Pg. 22)
He states, “There were inevitably demands for proof. With little or no remaining physical evidence, absolute proof was impossible to produce. However, as we shall see, the additional testimony by law enforcement officials and scientific researchers offered overwhelming evidence that it did indeed happen just as we reported it.” (Pg. 23-24)
Of the initial polygraph test of the crew, he recounts, “Allen spoke… ‘How do we know we can trust this guy?” We’ve heard that the government is always trying to hush these kinda things up. How do we know you’re not going to rig these lie-detector tests?’ The men began murmuring between themselves. They had nothing to lose if this guy was on the level, but if he was not, they could be tried for murder… [The polygraph examiner stated], ‘I’ll guarantee you one thing. If you guys are telling the truth, those charts will show it. And if you’re lying, I’ll find that out, too.’ … ‘Hell no, we’re not lying!’ Mike returned hotly. ‘We’re really only worried that you’ve been bought off. It’s not impossible, you know. We’ve heard that the government tries to keep these UFO things quiet.” (Pg. 69) The examiner reportedly told the man, “When I started testing you men this morning, I really expected to find that a murder had been committed… But none of the tests except Allen’s showed anything like that. Allen was must too agitated to be tested at all… he couldn’t have committed a crime and made up a story about a UFO without involving five other men whose tests corroborate what they reported.’” (Pg. 73-74)
Walton comments, “I guess many people’s concept of life is so mundane it can barely accommodate the fact that sometimes unusual things do happen… But when extraordinary things happen to extraordinary people, those people’s mind go into overload. The bottom line here: Duane passed two thorough series of polygraph test questions proving he had no knowledge of any hoax and had never even read a book on the subject. Later I offer additional disproof (as if it were needed) of the irrelevant ‘buff’ innuendo, with the polygraph tests I passed. And it actually is irrelevant, simply because it ignores so many other forms of specific evidence which speak directly to the central issue---what we saw and what happened.” (Pg. 127-128)
He argues, “Mike tried to talk me into joining him and Allen in being retested. I held firm, repeating my reasoning. But once Mike had been persuaded to commit himself to being retested, he became an avid proponent of broadening participation. He wouldn’t let up on me… My concerns were with getting dragged into defending against a new round of unfair attacks. I still felt I had nothing to gain… If there was ANY possibility of destroying yourself, with nothing to gain, why would any sane person play?” (Pg. 148)
Of his less successful test, he comments, “I have had a nurse take my pulse and comment in amazement on the slowness of my resting pulse…. The relevancy to my polygraph test is that if the examiner doesn’t know the examinee normally has a low resting pulse rate, he will be unable to note the significance of an elevated pulse rate caused by general agitation…. [I] sometimes skip a breath or two when physically inactive… McCarthy claimed in his final report that I ‘was deliberately attempting to distort’ my respiration pattern… I believe he had merely detected my respiratory quirk.” (Pg. 324-325) He adds, “Then [McCarthy] said: ‘Travis, your responses are deceptive.’ I was stunned… I said very emphatically, ‘THIS is what happened to me, as I see it, to the best of my knowledge.’ … McCarthy said: ‘Could it be that you have just, uh, made yourself BELIEVE that this happened to you?’” (Pg. 328)
He suggests, “If one wishes not to rely on my synopsis of the matter, beware of relying on the selective quotations PJK [Philip Klass] publishes. In can provide the opportunity to examine complete, unexpurgated copies for serious, respectable investigators, if any are THAT interested, of the whole frustrating exchange, with commentary (it amounts to an entire book in itself), so that a fully informed judgment can be made. Nearly everyone who followed the exchange … said it was plain to them that we were sincere and PJK was not.” (Pg. 346)
Personally, I am very skeptical of Walton’s account. (And I note that on March 19, 2021, crew leader and friend Mike Rogers posted the following statement on his Facebook page: “I, Michael H. Rogers, being of sound and rational mind, do hereby give notice that I am no longer to be considered a witness to Travis C. Walton’s supposed abduction of November 5, 1975.”) But ‘Caveat Emptor,’ for those who wish to read his book.