A very delightful introduction to Euclidean geometry. It also touches a bit on some of the history, which I always appreciate; I would have liked a bit more of this, but I imagine that it was difficult to fit too much of it in. The cartoon aspect sometimes seems to not add much to the material but there were some quite good jokes as well. There are a few places in which the author humorously alludes to a more advanced concept which is being skimmed over, although I'm not sure if it would be frustrating to one with less familiarity for these to be left unresolved. I would say that the difficulty level of the book is fairly low, and I definitely recommend it to anyone who is interested in learning about elementary geometry.
Unfortunately quite a few errors are present in the book, which, although minor, made the comment about "pesky proofreaders" in the acknowledgments feel a bit awkward. I kept a record of the errors which I caught, which I shall enumerate here for the benefit of anyone who may have been confused by them. I do not claim that this list is exhaustive, but I did my best to catch as many as I could.
- On page 235 it is claimed that the regular 9-, 11-, and 15-gons are impossible to construct with compass and straightedge. While the regular 9- and 11-gons are not constructible, the regular 15-gon is, 15 being the product of the distinct Fermat primes 3 and 5. In fact, Euclid inscribes a regular 15-gon in a circle as proposition 16 of book IV of the Elements. His method is rather pleasing, involving inscribing in a circle a regular pentagon and an equilateral triangle which share a vertex, and would have made a good addition to chapter 21.
- Postulates 1 and 2 are consistently swapped when referenced as justification during proofs. I suspect that they were labeled differently at some point during writing and the references were not updated.
- This is maybe just a nitpick, but on page 96 three historical figures are mentioned for their roles in the development of non-Euclidean geometry. Inexplicably missing, however, is János Bolyai, who I feel really should be there.
- Step 3 of the proof of theorem 5-2 cites theorem 6-2, despite this theorem not having been proved yet and having nothing to do with linear pairs. Probably theorem 5-1 was meant.
- In two places (once in the proof of theorem 6-5 on p. 73, and once on p. 184) a corollary 6-3.1 is referenced, which does not exist. The result being referenced is that the perpendicular bisector of the base of an isosceles triangle passes through the apex of the triangle. This result appears on p. 70, although it is not labelled as a corollary.
- The solution to chapter 9 problem 1d claims that the sum of the two angles is less than two right angles, but since the lines meet on the opposite side the angles must in fact be greater than two right angles.
- The solution to chapter 11 problem 6 states that angle RQA equals angle QRA, which is incorrect. It should say that angle RQA equals angle QRB.
- In step 7 of the proof of theorem 13-1 the triangle symbol is missing.
- The solution to chapter 13 problem 4b is missing a triangle symbol.
- The solution to chapter 14 problem 3 angle ADE should obviously be angle BDE.
- On p. 165 the ratio AP/AP' should be AP/AP''.
- The solution given for chapter 15 problem 1b is actually the solution to chapter 15 problem 1c.
- This one is a bit subtle, but in Theorem 17-4 on p. 191, for the justification of step 1 I feel that it makes more sense to cite the construction on p. 185 rather than the construction on p. 87, although they technically amount to the same thing so I can't really call this one an error.
- On p. 193 the part that says "by theorem 17-3" should say "by theorem 17-4."
- In the solution to chapter 18 problem 1a, the sides of the rectangle, and therefore the answer, are inexplicably off by a factor of 10 (should be 25 instead of 2.5).
- The solutions given to chapter 18 problems 3a-3c are actually the solutions to chapter 18 problems 4a-4c.
- The solution to chapter 20 problem 2b should be t = 1025 / cos(36) which is approximately 1266.97.
- Chapter 20 problem 5 states that AD and BC are altitudes of the given triangle, but really BD and AE are the altitudes in the diagram.