SUMMARY
Here, Peter Schweizer lays out China’s plan to destabilize the United States. It’s not a secret; they’ve declared their intentions and methods many times. But American leaders tend to give them the benefit of the doubt, form committees to “study” the issue while believing their lies, even when they’re not taking money from them to do so. Many politicians call out China before being elected and then do a 180 once they’re elected and China starts paying them off. The book focuses or four main outrages:
– Fentanyl
China has started its own opium war, manufacturing tons and tons of fentyanyl, shipping it to Latin America, and selling it below cost. It’s smuggled into the US and spread among drug users. Even those not intentionally taking it often end up taking pills containing it, unknown to them. Deaths from accidental overdoses have skyrocketed, which is intentional by China. Our response has been to complain about cartels and discuss rehab efforts.
– Violence
China smuggles illegal firearms into the US, usually through Mexico. Often they send tools that turn semi-automatic handguns into fully automatic ones. (For you liberals who don’t know anything about guns, semi-automatic means you pull the trigger and one bullet comes out. Fully automatic guns, which are illegal, will spray bullets continually with one trigger pull.) This arms criminals with deadlier weapons. Our response: more gun control laws! Because criminals will obey gun laws even if they don’t obey laws about murder. On top of this, China incites violent protests. The 2020 riots killed over a dozen people and cost billions in damage. A lot of this was from China sending in professional protestors incite violence.
– TikTok
This app is not allowed in China; its version is education and has time limits. The purpose of TikTok is to dumb down America’s youth and spread propaganda. It has already destroyed their attention spans and ruined grades. Many can’t even sit through a movie now. That’s before any security concerns. Hollywood also bows to China and avoids anything offensive to China in movies.
– Covid
China lied about Covid origins and lied about infection rates and lied that lockdowns were effective. It convinced other countries to lock down. This was to get free citizens used to living under tyranny. It did little to stop the disease and instead created a crisis of mental health, substance abuse, and domestic violence, not to mention loss of education and income for millions. China happily gave other countries advice on locking down its citizens and surveillance to catch rule-breakers.
COMMENTARY
There’s something about Western culture that can’t believe someone would purposely lie to us or want to kill us for no reason. “If we’re nice, they’ll be nice!” Sorry, it doesn’t work like that.
Peter is a good writer and a good researcher. Everything is cited and documented. He is not loyal to any politician or party and will call out anyone he finds tainted by corruption. The writing was interesting and engaging and went quickly.
Clean content
==============================
HIGHLIGHTS
When Joe Biden delivered the State of the Union address in 2023, he talked about fentanyl, acknowledging the stigma associated with substance abuse, and called for better substance abuse services. In other words, he treated it as a conventional drug problem. So he promised more drug detection machines and more inspections of cargo. What he never mentioned was Beijing’s hand in the matter. President Biden has been remarkably quiet in discussing China’s involvement in the drug trade; he does not challenge its leadership about their conduct. l … Some of these businessmen who funneled money to the Bidens have ties to the fentanyl trade, including $5 million from a Chinese national who was a business partner with a notorious triad leader. This cash flow connects the Bidens with Chinese triad associates.
As governor, [Gavin] Newsom has been reluctant to support even rudimentary initiatives designed to contain China’s activists in California. In 2022, the California State Legislature passed with strong bipartisan support a bill that would ban the sale of agricultural land in California to foreign governments, with a primary focus on China. Newsom vetoed the bill.
In 2022, fourteen US states announced that they were backing a Mexican government lawsuit against American gunmakers. The lawsuit alleged that the gun manufacturers were spurring violent crime in Mexico—even though the lawsuit presented no evidence that the gun manufacturers were shipping guns illegally or that laws were being broken. Yet none of these states has publicly taken China to task for trafficking illegal weapons technologies that are falling into the hands of criminal gangs operating in the United States. US political leaders are more focused on going after American gun manufacturers producing a legal product for millions of Americans than cracking down on Chinese companies catering to and further weaponizing criminal gangs in the United States. Gun control advocates focus their attention on taking away semi-automatic “assault rifles” from law-abiding citizens—supposedly to control crime. But they have been silent about China’s providing felons and criminal gangs with illegal devices that transform ordinary pistols into automatic weapons. Perhaps there is little political value in raising this issue, but it would seem to be a place where gun control advocates and Second Amendment advocates could find common ground. The question is, why does no one in Washington seem to care?
As millions of Americans sat glued to their TV screens and watched the protests and violence unfold [in 2013], many assumed that, in each case, the people they were seeing were local activists. In fact, though Black Lives Matter (BLM), named after the #BlackLivesMatter movement that followed Martin’s death, is the organization that gets most of the media attention, activists with pro-Beijing ties did much of the heavy lifting for the most violent protests that erupted.
As protests mounted across the United States in the summer of 2020, Twitter deleted an incredible 170,000 accounts linked to a Chinese government influence campaign, including accounts tweeting about George Floyd and other decisive issues. One tip-off was the fact that the tweets were overwhelming posted during business hours in Beijing. The organizers of the influence campaign worked to increase engagement on their tweets to “boost them to the top of Twitter’s search for specific hashtags.” Analysts said that “This allowed the campaign to effectively drown out organic activity on that hashtag for a period of time.” China’s president Xi had vowed to “retake the Internet battlefield.” The operation was now fully under way.
DSA [Democratic Socialists of America] manages to straddle the divide between being left wing and seemingly pro-Beijing while also being well positioned inside the Washington establishment. Beijing also sees the organization as useful in its goal of sowing dissension and divisiveness in the United States. The organization is unsparing in its condemnation of the US political system, regarding both the Senate and the Electoral College as “undemocratic.” But the organization has little critical to say about the dictatorial regime in Communist China.
The CCP delights in using the work or organizations such as the DSA for its own benefit. “Using foreign strength to propagandize China” is the idea that when foreigners make statements beneficial to Beijing, it is a particularly potent form of propaganda. As previously noted, Chinese government officials sometimes refer to it as “borrowing mouths to speak.” DSA leaders don’t seem to mind being dummies for this sort of political ventriloquism.
When activists from Beijing-allied groups such as FRSO and PSL organize protests and encourage violence, the news media cover the events but never mention the broader agenda or foreign ties of the organizations. They instead present their members as idealistic American activists. Likewise, other liberal and leftist organizations appear all too willing to work jointly with them, turning a blind eye to their deeper destructive agenda. And politicians in Washington seem to be cowed into silence, unable to isolate the organizations from the broader movement. … Pro-Beijing groups see the trans movement as a powerful force to advance their pro-Beijing agenda and push to further radicalize the movement.
Chinese propagandists also recognize that young Western people may easily discern and discredit themes or messages from one source but not when that theme or message comes from many sources. They compare this phenomenon to “multiple voices in a choir. Each communication subject sings its own melody.” The key is to simulate community—a peer group—as TikTok does. “Content control is becoming more important,” said analyst Liu Ying, noting that “emotional incitement … can affect public opinion more than facts and truth.”
ByteDance desperately wants Americans to believe that it is not a Chinese company. In 2020 (updated in 2021), TikTok distributed a memo within the company entitled [sic] “TikTok Master Messaging,” concerning public relations with the American media. First: “Emphasise TikTok as a brand/platform.” Next: “Downplay the parent company ByteDance” to “downplay the China association.” In 2021, the company circulated employee guidance to address questions about “China/ByteDance Ownership.” “TikTok is a global company,” the spin claimed, obscuring Chinese control. “The app is only for users aged 13 and over, according to our terms and conditions,” the memo stated, obscuring the reality that a full third of the platform’s users could be fourteen or younger. “There, in relation to our users, we may speak of young people, but not of children.” (Emphasis added.)
TikTok is severely damaging the cognitive abilities of America’s youth. The phenomenon is known as “TikTok brain.” A stunning 50 percent of TikTok users develop addiction signs: nervousness, irritability, anxiousness, and severe sadness when deprived of the app. “The app provides an endless stream of emotional nudges, which can be hard to recognize and really impact users in the long run,” argued Marc Faddoul, a codirector of the digital rights group Tracking Exposed. He warned that heavy use “can have a serious impact on your mental health.”
China’s TCL Technology produces television sets for companies such as Walmart, Best Buy, Costco, and Target. The Ellen DeGeneres Show and the Call of Duty video game series each count it as corporate sponsor and partner. Never mind that in 2020, it was revealed by the US Department of Homeland Security that the company had “incorporated backdoors into all of its TV sets exposing users to cyber breaches and data exfiltration.” The company could hack the data as Americans were in their living rooms and surveil them, sending their images and conversations to China. When the breach was exposed, TCL claimed that it had fixed the problem with a patch—without notifying anyone. (Trust us, they said.)
In early June 2021, newly elected president Joe Biden rescinded Trump’s TikTok order to force a sale and replaced it with an open-ended order calling for greater investigation. In Washington, sometimes the best way to avoid action is to commit to studying the problem. Biden’s hesitancy was intriguing. Just months earlier, during the height of the 2020 election, the Biden campaign had demanded that all staff members remove TikTok from their phones, citing security concerns. If he thought it was such a security risk for his staff, why wouldn’t he want to protect the American people?
It had long been accepted that lockdowns and the severe disruptions they caused sabotaged the fight against pandemics. Dr. Donald Henderson, who was responsible for eradicating smallpox, explained to colleagues in 2006, “Experience has shown that communities faced with epidemics or other adverse events respond best and with the least anxiety when the normal social functioning of the community is least disrupted.” Indeed, he and his colleagues went on, “There are no historical observations or scientific studies that support the confinement by quarantine of groups of possibly infected people for extended periods in order to slow the spread of influenza.” He even cited a WHO working group that had concluded that “forced isolation and quarantine are ineffective and impractical.” And given all that, “The negative consequences of large-scale quarantine are so extreme … that this mitigation measure should be eliminated from serious consideration.” In contrast, lockdowns have long been enforced in China. While a quarantine requires the sick to stay at home, a lockdown requires everyone to stay at home. The practice has been common in China going back centuries. In the crucial days of the spring of 2020, American and European leaders abandoned its own medical wisdom and imitated the authoritarian policies of the Chinese police state. Within weeks, they imposed forced lockdowns throughout the Western world. Beijing lauded their doing so as an endorsement of its repressive measure. What happened? Beijing’s hand loomed large in laying the groundwork for US leaders to embrace the Chinese model of keeping people in their homes.
Imperial College London was in rarified company. The relationship continued, and in 2018, it was one of only two European colleges (none in the United States) to sign a “strategic academic cooperation agreement” with China’s most elite college, Tsinghua University in Beijing. Indeed, Imperial College also was the site of two major companies, whose work could “advance China’s military ambitions.” They were shut down by the British government in 2022. When Ferguson and his team, which included Chinese researchers, put together their bombshell reports, they relied on data from Beijing. Chinese misinformation embedded in those apocalyptic reports played to human fears, causing Western leaders to imitate the repressive Chinese state and forcibly lock their societies down.
The rapid pace with which the United States abandoned its own protocols and embraced Beijing’s model [for Covid lockdowns] was remarkable. Even Professor Ferguson, who had gotten the ball rolling with his doomsday reports, was stunned by how quickly the United States slide into repressive measures. “I think people’s sense of what is possible in terms of control changed quite dramatically between January and March,” he said later. “… It’s a communist one-part state, we said. We couldn’t get away with that in Europe, we thought. … And then Italy did it. And we realised we could. … If China had not done it, the year would have been very different.”
The world eventually discovered the obvious: China had not controlled the virus; it had covered it up and controlled the narrative. From the earliest days of the pandemic, Beijing controlled the narrative message. On February 3, President Xi directed the Chinese media to report the country’s response as “heroic.” … Ordinary Chinese people who attempted to tell the world the truth were silenced.
Lockdowns in the United States quickly became subject to political manipulation and control. As reported by CNN, hundreds of health care professionals wrote a letter supporting the Black Lives Matters protestors gathering in large numbers, which went against social distancing and lockdown rules. But they added, “This should not be confused with a permissive stance on all gatherings, particularly protests against stay-home orders. Those actions not only oppose public health interventions but are rooted in white nationalism.” They never explained why rejecting lockdowns was a racist matter. Lockdowns enabled a chosen few—almost always Democrats—to exert control not only over people’s daily habits but over who had the right to speak out. It was straight of George Orwell’s Animal Farm, except that in this case: All free speech is equal, but some free speech is more equal than others.
In early April, California governor Gavin Newsom proudly announced on national television that he had signed a $1 billion contract with a Chinese company to provide masks and other medical equipment for California health care workers. The contract was with BYD, a Chinese company with no experience in producing medical gear. However, among other things, it did build guidance systems for the Chinese military’s missile program. BYD also had a history of hiring lobbyists to secure no-bid contracts—as was this one. When the contract terms were finally made public, it included heavily inflated prices. And when the masks arrived, federal inspectors rejected them for being subpar and unsafe. None of this seemed to have bothered Newsom. When he traveled to China in October 2023, he visited a BYD factory, praising their products.
Staying home caused a whole host of terrible outcomes. Half of cancer patients reportedly skipped their chemotherapy sessions. Organ transplant surgeries involving living donors dropped by 85 percent. Severe child abuse cases jumped by 35 percent. Suicide attempts by teenage girls skyrocketed some 50 percent. Not to mention the dramatic negative effects the lockdowns had on education and low-wage workers. Some advocates of the lockdowns argued that they were important to calm citizens; they would lessen public anxiety. But studies demonstrated that they had the opposite effect, creating more fear. l … Fear tactics pushed by Beijing drove our political leaders to seek solutions from Beijing. The American people were looking to their leaders for guidance—our leaders were looking to the CCP. Beijing sought to prevail over, not work with, the United States. Beyond its obfuscation of data about the virus and cornering of medical supplies, it actively worked to undermine US efforts to come up with medical treatments for the virus.
The WHO investigation was more of a bureaucratic cover-up than a scientific investigation. The purpose and scope of the WHO investigation was “to identify the zoonotic source of the virus.” In other words, the scientists would not even be going to take a serious look at the prospects of a lab leak.
(ONE MORE IN COMMENTS)