Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

The Time of Illusion.. An historical and reflective account of the Nixon era.

Rate this book
Schell Jonathan. - The Time of Illusion.. An historical and reflective account of the Nixon era. Vintage Books,, New York, 1976 yr., 408 pp.. Paperback

Paperback

First published December 12, 1975

5 people are currently reading
147 people want to read

About the author

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
19 (31%)
4 stars
25 (41%)
3 stars
10 (16%)
2 stars
4 (6%)
1 star
2 (3%)
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews
234 reviews
April 29, 2021
It covers the evolution from the Cold War into and out of Vietnam. There is a major focus on Richard Nixon's presidency.
It's somewhat dated since many more sources have come to light in the past 40 years, but still worthwhile.
Profile Image for Dennis Fischman.
1,830 reviews43 followers
October 1, 2016
One of the books that has most influenced my thinking 0ver the course of my life.
Profile Image for Paul Gaya Ochieng Simeon Juma.
617 reviews45 followers
May 30, 2023
It was extremely difficult for me to put down this book. Richard Nixon (RN) is an interesting study for those interested in politics. In a democracy, one would expect leaders to promote and fulfill the will of the people, obey institutions, and act within the bounds of the law. If this is true, then according to this book, RN was a different kind of leader. While a 'rational' leader may have sufficient reasons to concede to the necessity for laws and the benefits for obeying them, RN's aim was to proselytize and overthrow America's legal order.

What struck me most about this book was the President's courage and determination to consolidate state power in the executive. It was so easy for him to lie and evince opinions aimed at promoting his lawless actions both in the domestic and foreign fronts. For instance, he carried on an illegal war against North-Vietnam which he had promised to end, he called for his 'right' to appoint supreme court justices of his own choosing, he limited press freedom, he weakened and undermined state institutions and conducted illegal surveillance of against both his supporters and political opponents.

To achieve these ends, according to Schell, RN employed various theories and tactics. Some of the theories that he used included that of America's credibility and inherent power of the president. According to RN, his actions were justified because they ensured the place of America as a global power. As for tactics, RN employed a number, the main one being secrecy. When you come to think of it, a man does things in secret in order to avoid punishment.

The President, through secrecy, wanted to act freely and with impunity without any checks and balances from other state institutions and without the public's knowledge. His aim was to keep the public in the dark by saying one thing and dong the exact opposite. However, he grossly overestimated the success of his own plans while underestimating the public's capacity to see through them. In the end, RN achieved the opposite of what he had aimed to do which was to increase the President's power and maintain America's credibility in the world's stage.

They say that a good gambler always knows before other people when his luck is beginning to turn and a bad gambler believes it when it isn't true. RN was a bad gambler. He started out by risking America's credibility and power to gain more credibility and power and suffered reprisals that led to the loss of both credibility and power.
Profile Image for Louis.
38 reviews3 followers
March 7, 2007
This is a collection of all Schell's Watergate/Nixon-era pieces from The New Yorker. Schell, who was a classmate of Wallace Shawn's, wrote for famous New Yorker editor William Shawn (father of Wallace). I'm a bit of a Watergate freak and this is one of those books that I just pick up from time to time and read in chunks.
Profile Image for Peter.
876 reviews24 followers
October 5, 2009
Had to read this for a class in college about the presidency. I still own the book. Don't remember all that much about it, but that it was good. A different coverage of the Nixon years.
Displaying 1 - 6 of 6 reviews

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.