Content warnings are listed at the end of my review! S. Bear Bergman currently uses he/him/his pronouns, rather than the past ze/hir/hirs pronouns used in the book, so my review will use Bear's current pronouns.
This book never really grabbed my whole attention, it was lukewarm and readable and my opinion stayed continually such until Bergman suddenly unleashed anti-Asian comments toward a friend of his near the end of this book. I'll detail this more later in my review, but it wholly spoiled my thoughts of the book, bringing the complains I was compiling but dismissing back to the top of my attention. It's your tried tired and true trans nonfiction of a white transmasculine guy talking about his life. He brings the perspective of a Jewish person, his gender at the time being a complex transmasculine identity that didn't fit binary roles, and being married to another trans man... But he didn't really present these in any memorable way aside from short essays like reading an excessively long Instagram caption that you skim and then skip (without the pictures even).
CW ANTI-CHINESE RACISM: Bear makes a comment to his friend who is mixed race, being raised by his close family who is Chinese that after being rejected in many interviews despite being a talented candidate that he should "...Wear a band-collared shirt instead of a straight-collared shirt-with-tie, and display a dragon adornment somewhere on you as well. Don’t get a haircut beforehand. Speak even a little more softly, and a little more slowly. Let them project whatever Orientalism they have onto you, and then they can understand you as some sort of Tao Master of the Database." I think this was incredibly out of line as someone who is white and not Chinese. He uses this to springboard into a conversation about Western gender roles and their confining expectations but from a standpoint of race looping it back to himself as a white transgender man, that is not his conversation to take over or have. Earlier in the book Bergman had a conversation like this from a perspective he could claim talking about explaining the stoic masculinity Western culture demands that his Jewish family does not enforce- so this was just senseless to include.
I think this is a good example of the weakness of this work- he goes out guns a blazing with what his thoughts are, trying to be as radical and unapologetic to a fault, making it excessive at best, or as we saw racist at worst. This shouldn't have made it past the draft but it survived to print, and I just don't think a lot was offered to make digging though this hold value. The personal bits aren't written with enough effort put in to make them garner investment, and the theories are slapdash and too closely confined to Bergman's experience rather than the broad community so I walk away unsure with what his goal was. A great example of this is in "SING IF YOU'RE GLAD TO BE TRANS" where he continually emphasizes the link between sex and queerness, which causes happiness, jumping neatly over asexual folks and generalizing that all queer sex is positive and detached from how it is depicted in adult films (unfortunately, rape still happens and standards set by film still set harmful ideas of how to behave). There's no start or finish to even justify this as anything more than calling this a printed out blog, just loose rambling stumbling around until the book finally concludes.
Summary:
Readability: ★☆☆☆☆, Pros: Bear's attitude can be funny. Cons: this attitude contributes to the writing style that's only marker is transgression, which gets old and dangerous as Bear blunders into racism. He very liberally uses slurs, and as someone who is supportive of folks reclaiming slurs that they can, I even found it excessive, lacking creativity, and unproductive. The lack of direction just bored me, it felt like doom scrolling through a blog archive but the only thing not deleted was the vent posts with maybe 3 engagements a piece.
Entertainment: ★★☆☆☆, It's caught halfway between being a collection of gender theory essays and a personal memoir, so both ideas fight with the little amount of effort they are given leaving both possible goals feeling undercooked and forgettable.
Audience: I don't know who this book will service, and time has aged it poorly. It doesn't even provide enough solid groundwork of context to justify it as historical value (Aside from how trans visibility being a slow trickle let otherwise unnoteworthy voices randomly into the spotlight). I don't have any reason to recommend this to any reader.
Content Warnings: anti-Chinese stereotyping, antisemitism, deadnames, death, divorce, dysphoria, fatphobia, financial anxiety, gatekeeping, homophobia, implied ace exclusion, islamophobia, medical discrimination, medical emergency, misgendering, pregnancy, racism, sex, slurs