What do you think?
Rate this book
Logic
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important, and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the "public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
512 pages, Paperback
First published July 1, 2007
2 people are currently reading
12 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
April 5, 2019
A quote from the book:
“Since then, the Kantian principle of antinomies which underlies the Logic of Mansel and Hamilton has boldly come to the front in England under the shadow of the great name of Hegel, and English logicians have either ranged themselves under the banner of one or other of these new schools, or else have sought to cover the glaring inconsistencies of some one of them with patches borrowed from the others, until the modern student has a bewildering choice among a series of guides, each of whom follows a path of his own, leading in the end to obscurity and confusion and self- contradiction, but who are all united in this, that they discard and misrepresent the traditional teaching of Aristotle and of the mediaeval logicians.”
Their philosophy is confusing and contradicts itself, and as shown by many they make caricatures of what Aristotle and St. Thomas actually said. Unfortunately it is because of these clowns that many think philosophy which is the supreme science to be more or less useless. Truth does not change even if most people are not defending it. The rule of the modern “philosophers” is non serviem(I will not serve).
And here is the book in english: https://archive.org/details/cu3192403...
“Since then, the Kantian principle of antinomies which underlies the Logic of Mansel and Hamilton has boldly come to the front in England under the shadow of the great name of Hegel, and English logicians have either ranged themselves under the banner of one or other of these new schools, or else have sought to cover the glaring inconsistencies of some one of them with patches borrowed from the others, until the modern student has a bewildering choice among a series of guides, each of whom follows a path of his own, leading in the end to obscurity and confusion and self- contradiction, but who are all united in this, that they discard and misrepresent the traditional teaching of Aristotle and of the mediaeval logicians.”
Their philosophy is confusing and contradicts itself, and as shown by many they make caricatures of what Aristotle and St. Thomas actually said. Unfortunately it is because of these clowns that many think philosophy which is the supreme science to be more or less useless. Truth does not change even if most people are not defending it. The rule of the modern “philosophers” is non serviem(I will not serve).
And here is the book in english: https://archive.org/details/cu3192403...
March 8, 2011
i need to learn how correctly use my reason, before using it, without it i can not be "reasonably" happy.....first book i stonehedge college series....introduction to scholastic(traditional catholic ) type of thinking...not bad...i wanna be happy
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews