Västerlandets filosofi

by Anthony Kenny, Jim Jakobsson (Translator), Peter Ragnarsson (Illustrator)

Den västerländska filosofins historia från antiken till vår tid.

Genres: Philosophy, History, Nonfiction

591 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1998

About the author

Sir Anthony Kenny is an English philosopher whose interests lie in the philosophy of mind, ancient and scholastic philosophy, the philosophy of Wittgenstein, and the philosophy of religion.

Reviews

[Anonimo · Rating 5 out of 5]

I'm ashamed to say it took me over a decade after buying this book to actually read it. Perhaps specialists and philosophy buffs will have other opinions, but for the uninitiated this book does exactly what you want it to do. This is not simply a chronology of famous names and dates or a series of biographical notes; it is very much a history of the ideas themselves, told in an objective, concise and, occasionally, witty manner. The examination is critical at times, not in the negative layman's sense but in the sense that it hints at some of the vulnerabilities and counterpoints that have or may be offered against the ideas presented. While it won't make you an expert on anything, obviously, I found that it did give me a platform and the confidence I was looking for to go on to read more on the subject. At the very least, the book will make you conversant on the bigger topics. It should be noted that there is very little 20th century philosophy beyond Russel and Wittgenstein and almost nothing on American philosophy (a revised edition would be a good idea), but that is a minor quibble.

[Chandler · Rating 4 out of 5]

JESUS that took a while!! man...if this guy likes wittgenstein so much then why doesnt he MARRY him! but this is honestly a pretty good book. i just feel owned that a few months ago they came out with a revised edition that i cant find a pdf for. local library has one tho so...hm...

[Johannes Solano · Rating 3 out of 5]

I've read parts of this book. I'm currently rereading the whole thing. At first, this looks like an ambitious summary but upon reading it; I find it quite disappointing. Apart from being short, Professor Anthony Kenny offers much more historical information than philosophical content. First of all, this is not an ideal introduction for beginners. The author provides more philosophical jargon than elucidations which makes it a bit technical. Second, it is quite short and thin. In just 300+ pages or so, you can't expect to learn the whole history of western philosophical thought although there are short histories out there which are quite dense in terms of information(Roger's Scruton Short History of Modern Philosophy for instance). And finally, Kenny fails to provide the best points or important contributions of some thinkers thus, providing only 3 to 5 pages to some of them that it is difficult to find intellectual satisfaction.

My views might change in the future though.

[Bartek Maciej · Rating 3 out of 5]

Nie jest to łatwa dla laika książka, napisana ciężkim językiem, w wielu miejscach skrótowa przez co jeszcze cięższa w odbiorze,

[Jannik Faierson · Rating 4 out of 5]

It took me many weeks and months but now I finally finished the History of Philosophy. Not literally like Hegel, but by reading a textbook next to my studies. Only having the time to read once or twice a week, Kenny's style has been very facilitative. He presents the complex net of ideas through the lenses of all relevant philosophers since ancient times. By separating their systems into short chapters, which summarize disciplines, works or phases, single ideas are quick to grasp. Yet, the big themes concerning the true nature of knowledge, reality, and meaning shimmer throughout the many chapters.
A great and comprehensive reading to develop a deeper understanding of the development of philosophy. It's like looking at a stage where many different actors perform a theater play.
At the same time, Kenny offers a concise and usable overview of each individual protagonist, which makes it an ideal book of reference for future projects.

[Mike_dangerous · Rating 5 out of 5]

I loved this book. The dude has a sense of humor, and he predigests the ideas of many fine philosophers, and this allowed me to plow through the book in bits and pieces over a few months.

As a bonus, his early comments on Empedocles almost killed me. Things go pretty much chronologically. And even at the end, the author is sharp and witty with Wittgenstein.

[Luís Branco · Rating 4 out of 5]

I've enjoyed reading this book. My only remarks are the lack of mention of Jonathan Edwards and C. S. Lewis.

[Eddie · Rating 2 out of 5]

Possibly the most boring book I’ve ever read.

A better title would probably be “An Illustrated Brief History of Western Philosophy, or Rather, of Logic, Written in the Driest and Most Boring Way Possible: Who Ever Said that Philosophy Should Be Interesting?”

I’ve always thought I had a philosophical element in me. I grew up considering the meaning of life with friends, wondering what makes a good life and what that even means. I thought this book would give me a more professional foundation from which I could spring into even more competent musings. But if I got anything out of this book at all, it is only a doubt that I am a philosophical person. If philosophy is just math with words, trying to come up with the most abstract argument possible to prove some seemingly irrelevant and useless point, then I am no philosopher.

The author is clearly intelligent. He possesses an encyclopedic knowledge of philosophers famous and obscure from antiquity to the present day. It’s impressive. But he lacks even the most basic elements of storytelling. I am not one who believes that to be taken seriously one must avoid stories. Stories are what unite us as humans, what inspire and guide us. This book did none of that.

I’m not sure where to go from here with my relationship with philosophy. None of my questions were answered — they were rarely even addressed and when they were, inadequately so. If anyone knows of some better sources grappling with questions on morality, ethics, or free will, please let me know.

[Markus Fiegener · Rating 4 out of 5]

This book feels far too dense for what its worth- Kenny focuses far too much on breaking down the works of philosophers rather than showing how this movement begat that.

I don’t know what demographic Kenny was trying to reach with this book- it seems like those who are well acquainted with with the subject would be bored to tears by the biography of Wittgenstein, while those who are just getting into philosophy will have an impossible task of puzzling out the Philosophy of Logic from these biographies.

Still, it’s a pretty handy reference book, and I’ll treat it as such. You can go back to it whenever you need a cliffnotes version of a thinkers life and works, and I’ve found it works well as a primer for a specific text you’re beginning to study.

Still, this is a massive undertaking have to give credit where credit is due- the author knows his subject.

[Maksym Popovych · Rating 4 out of 5]

Definitely a challenge.

Philosophy was my favorite class at university. And this book is mostly a summary of the teachings of major Western philosophers. But still it wasn’t an easy read. Lots of descriptions of Medieval and early Renaissance thinkers honestly seemed convoluted and largely irrelevant. I wish the author had dedicated more time to the late nineteenth and early twentieth century teachings. Also, I would prefer more ‘running’ cross-cutting themes and concepts and how their understanding evolved through the centuries. There was a bit of that but still the book is very much personality-based rather than school of thought or method-based.

I was also disappointed with a very brief discussion of Sartre who is my favorite philosopher. The post war part seemed snappy and lacked structure.

[Joel Olsson · Rating 4 out of 5]

Det är en mycket intressant och välskriven introduktion till några av de mest inflytelserika filosofiska tänkarna under västerlandets världshistoria. Det är förstås rätt så kortfattat hos vissa tänkare och det finns säkert några viktiga filosofer som inte ens tas upp. Jag tycker ändå de fick med de viktigaste. Dock ibland blir Kenny lite för partisk i sina beskrivningar om Filosofiska idéer och börjar resonera emot dem inget fel i det men ibland kom de upp vid dåliga tillfällen som mitt i argumenten.
Annars en trevlig bok och en fin start till att lära sig mer om Filosofi. Inte lika mastig som Svante Nordins filosofi böcker men en bra introduktion till filosofins historia i allmänhet.

3,8/5

[Andrei Hognogi · Rating 4 out of 5]

On par with Bertrand Russell's history of philosophy and it's amazing to read to contrast the two and triangulate a better understanding of each era.

Summary of how they compare:
+ (Kenny's) spends more time on antiquity and presocratics
- less time on Aristotle
- less time on medieval philosophy
+ a more succinct recounting of Maimonedes and Islamic scholars
- less time on Hegel
+ More time on Wittingstein

Just go ahead read them both.

[jm · Rating 2 out of 5]

Few books have led to such a culling of my to-read list!

Of course, this is mainly the fault of the subject matter itself — once again I found myself vindicated in the position that 90% of philosophy is nothing but mental masturbation. The problem lies also in the writing itself, however - the vignettes are so short that they have little less substance than an encyclopedia entry, and also their writing style is hardly more captivating than that of an encyclopedia.

[Reno Syaputra · Rating 5 out of 5]

I am neither a philosophy nor social science student, but have a huge passion in understanding western philosophy for catching most of the seminar in social and political science class. This book is the go-to when you want to see western philosophy from the bird eye point of view. It is not as detail as the book by Copleston. But for an introduction purpose, this book is perfect.

[Naresh Sahu · Rating 4 out of 5]

Good read if you are beginning to tread on the path to study philosophy and want introductory explanation of all the ideas and how they came about. Just was a little disheartened to find no mention of Albert Camus.

[Ray W · Rating 3 out of 5]

Lots of great information but BORING as all get out.

[Gary · Rating 4 out of 5]

Read this twice, once at College, and over the past few years. Both occasions were helpful (for a survey).

Liked it.

[Christian Chapman · Rating 4 out of 5]

brief, catholic

[Wendy · Rating 4 out of 5]

Concise

Kenny’s book is a concise chronological introduction to the great minds of philosophical thought through the ages. There were a few explanations of theories that were not particularly clear and could have been helped with illustrations or perhaps an alternative approach to explain it.

[Nic · Rating 4 out of 5]

Original title: A Brief History of Western Philosophy. A good classic introduction to Western philosophy from ancient Greece to Wittgenstein. Kenny provides a lot of historical context and does not only present philosophical ideas on their own. His style is easy to read and quite enjoyable. Being a brief history, some philosophers were presented better than others, but that seems to come with the territory. His new history is twice as long and I think I'd like to read it. I particularly like that he gives space to medieval philosophy, I find that many skip that part.

[Neal Javia]

Surprised by the omission of a few prominent philosophers like Heidegger

[Othoob]

This volume is quite short. Nonetheless, the author tries to mention every aspect of philosophy briefly, and I had to further study these topics to widen the area of my knowledge. However, this book is excellent. His explanation (mostly) is understandable, yet, lacks depth (which is something to be expected since it’s a short volume).
He also includes history, and the important turning points, and provides historical context before explaining the philosophy of that time.

Some parts of the book were superficial in explanation which sometimes leaves you with more questions (and I used some other online sources for more clarification). Overall this book is good. Although it may not have the depth that you want, you can get an idea of the main philosophy and concepts of each era and school of thought. So, if you are planning to read more about them, at least you’d know what to search for. There’s another book by the same author that is a bigger volume and provides a more detailed history of philosophy which I’d recommend more (especially by this author).

[Seamusin · Rating 5 out of 5]

Fantastic. He's tied so much together in such a neat package. Nice interplay between outlines of philosophers and their criticisms. Chatper 20 (Darwain, Newman and Freud) is to me out of place - would have preferred something on existentialism rather... But still, a heavily-highlighted book I'll keep safe for years to come.

[Henrik Haapala · Rating 5 out of 5]

Beautiful overview of the history of philosophy. We should not judge the present as hard as we do. Maybe a return to the old classics would benefit us. All philosophy consists of footnotes to Plato. Required reading in university philosophy class. Short, succinct and clear texts and paragraphs on the greatest philosophers in history.

[Steven Dunn · Rating 5 out of 5]

Best book on philosophical history, in my opinion.

[Hailey Paetz · Rating 1 out of 5]

Super dry. I really only read the first 6 chapters because of my random hyper fixation on greek and roman philosophers. Learned a lot. Would not recommend 💀