Funny story: With economy degrees from Berkeley and Cambridge, a capitalist boi is offered a chance to contribute to the "liberation" of South Africa by becoming a leftist MP in the post-apartheid parliament. Honed in the economy schools of the core, his nose immediately smells opportunity.
He devotes himself to drafting, defending and passing aggressive neoliberal policies that opened the country's economy into imperialist capital, privatised public assets and smashed the bargaining power of the workers to create "a more flexible labour market" (p. 60). He gets sad when some politicians complain about the gap between the rich and the poor, as they "jarred the frail consensus in South Africa" (p. 78). Hah, 'frail consensus', namely the illegitimate rule of the rich over the pacified masses.
And once these policies come into full effect, they ruin the country's healthcare system, crush the purchasing power of the workers, further enrich the already ultra-rich white minority to the detriment of desperate masses, whose lives are now 10-years shorter because of raging HIV/AIDS epidemic. The "liberator" ANC politicians go full corrupt and sign shady deals with British and German arms dealers, pocketing sizeable sums of bribes.
Our capitalist boi is now heartbroken. Why did this happen? Wasn't a benign, moral, constructive capitalism that is useful for everyone, rich and poor, possible? Maybe, just maybe, if he wrote a book about how he battled against the corrupt politicians within his own party and lost, he could right the wrongs of capitalism and be the hero and the saviour of the masses?
Footnote to the author: I was not even slightly interested about the details of how your "testicles shrivelled in fright" after you lost an argument about corruption in the parliament. But thanks.