J.M.W. Turner (1775-1851) is the most masterly of British painters. His work exploits the great traditions of European painting, while anticipating the development of modern art in the twentieth century.
William Gaunt (1900–1980) was a British artist and art historian.
After serving briefly with the Durham Light Infantry in the First World War, Gaunt went on to Worcester College, Oxford, and graduated with honours. He completed an MA at the Ruskin School of Drawing and found work as a painter, art historian, art critic, novelist and travel book writer.
During the Second World War he was commissioned by the War Artists’ Advisory Committee to paint London city bomb sites.
Gaunt was drawn to the Pre-Raphaelites, whom he considered to be underappreciated, and wrote his most enduring book on the subject, The Pre-Raphaelite Tragedy (1942), followed by further studies of Victorian art, The Aesthetic Adventure (1945) and Victorian Olympus (1952).
I have to give this four stars. I've always loved Turner. Was he the painter who gave birth to impressionism, almost a century before the style became fashionable in France? William Gaunt's Colour Library, once past the rather long introduction, contains forty eight sample colour plates that span the output of this artists work. Turner captures the maelstrom of natural forces in 'plein air' many years before the term was first used by French impressionist artists. His works with watercolour and gouache are some of my favourites. 'The burning of the Houses of Parliament' from 1834 and 'The Fighting Temeraire', score high in my all time list of English art. Great book, just to look at the pictures! Don't really want to return this to the library.
I know absolutely nothing about art or art theory or art history, so a lot of the text went over my head and I can't speak to whether it was a good analysis of Turner's work or not. Even though I couldn't comprehend everything, I enjoyed simply the fact that someone cares so much about this art that they spent so much time and thought on it. I, of course, also appreciated all the images of the art, and was able to occasionally catch the drift of what the author was speaking about with some of the paintings. I appreciated most the contrast of light in many of his paintings. My laptop's desktop is a revolving background of art pieces that I like and more than a few from this book made it into the rotation.
Well I think I've learnt a few more art critiquing terms than I knew before. A good book in discussing the paintings (although reading the introduction meant flicking through to the paintings all the time, which was a bit annoying, rather than putting these comments beside the images), but not a lot of background information, which would have been useful.