George Turner's "Brain Child" is near-future techno-thriller set in Australia. There, because of the "Greenhouse Effect" (a 1990s term for global climate change), the Australian government has imposed its version of the Chinese one-child restriction. The state determines who can or cannot have babies. Those babies born outside of state approval are sent to state-run orphanages. The novel's protagonist-narrator, David Chance, is one such child. He seems on track for a normal life as an orphan who, at 25 years old, has a budding career as a journalist. Then, his father makes contact, and David's life becomes a nightmare. David's father is one of twelve people created decades before as the product of a secret government plan in bio-engineering geniuses. The children were divided into three groups - A, B, and C - where A group were geniuses in science and engineering, B group were geniuses in the arts, and C group were geniuses in general intelligence. The whole experiment went horribly wrong because C group became super intellects, so far beyond human intelligence that even as children they consider all humans as mere animals. David's A-group father, Arthur Hazard, persuades David to investigate the mystery of why, at 20 years old, all of C group committed suicide, and, more particularly, the whereabouts of the secret legacy of C-group child Conrad, otherwise known as Young Feller, who supposedly left behind the secret of bioengineering so grand that, in Conrad's words, it could turn dogs into gods. Thus, David plunges into the dark world of rich, retired politicians, state secrets, secret police, and the aloof indifference of his manipulative biological "family" of manufactured geniuses.
It's a reasonably well written story told by David 25 years after the events, with two interludes narrated by his mentor and stand-in psychological father, the secret agent Jonesey. There are also occasional bits, mostly early in the novel, when the people David interviews tell their stories from recordings David had made. These are not differentiated enough in style to distinguish their voices from David's or each other's. The narrative has some ham-fisted foreshadowing, of the "I was to learn otherwise" variety. The mystery David pursues is interesting enough in itself to warrant reading the book once. Turner's is a cautionary tale about recklessly experimenting on the human genome, and, fortunately, Turner never takes the "it's against nature" approach.