This is Homer, played for laughs, but not in any obnoxious way. Chwast's interpretation uses many of the comic book tropes to good effect: thought bubbles, side bars, explanatory arrows and thunderbolts. The story chugs along enlivened by the conceit that Odysseus has a space ship and he and Telemachus battle the suitors with Ray guns. There is some contextual female nudity, but it's hard to imagine anyone in a swivet over Chwast's simplistic rendering of a half circle with a dot.
What I can't forgive: and what knocked this from a high four to a three, is some missed opportunities that should have been total soft-balls for a graphic novel.
In a climactic scene Odysseus wins Penelope's hand by shooting an arrow through a dozen axes. The text is confusing, the contest is hard to imagine, so it is a perfect opportunity for a graphic novel to shine, but sadly a missed one. Chwast pictures a dozen axes balanced on their handles, each with a hole through the head of the axe, with the handle protruding directly above and below the hole. ( How could that work?) It makes no visual or physical sense. Less than two minutes on google revealed scholars believe the hole the arrows shot through were the holes in the head of the axe that the handle fits in; these were axe-heads without handles. Now I get it.
One of the most famous pieces of trivia from the Odyssey is the secret-fact only Odysseus knew about his and Penelope's marital bed. It is his knowledge that the bed can not be moved because one of it's posts was a living olive tree that he built the bed, and then the house, around, which convinces Penelope the beggar is really the returned Odysseus. So why would Chwast picture the bed on the second floor and show it with ordinary posts just a few frames before Odysseus describes it as a rooted olive tree? Very perplexing and irritating.
And a final minor quibble is- why not name Odysseus' dog? Argos has been famous for centuries for being faithful. Why deprive readers of his name?