I really wanted to like this book more than I did.
The author obviously did a great deal of research for the book, and often that effort alone would have prompted me to at least give three stars, especially on a first book. First books often have first-book-itis and I account for that, for example being forgiving of the type of information-dumping that happened in this first book.
But, the protagonist in this book is a horrible excuse for a human being, one I suspect is at best a narcissist and maybe even a sociopath. I could never in good conscience give a good rating to a book that tries to make a hero, or even a sympathetic character, of such a character - someone who (pardon the pun) utterly lacks any character. UGH! No. Our world has too much elevating of a$$holes, and, as recent events show, elevating a$$holes has very negative, very real-world repercussions.
It is time we (as a society) stop trying to make this type of person/character, this type of characterless person a 'hero' or even 'sympathetic'. It is time that those of us with good conscience start speaking up and saying 'this is wrong'. So, I am saying, 'this is wrong'.
One star for this book entirely because of its protagonist, rounded up to two stars because the author did a huge amount of research for the book and I feel badly not giving some credit for that. I won't be reading the next book in the series, and it is doubtful that I would any more work by this author.