This book offers a different approach to leadership and management - do less and focus on leading and planning for the future. The concept isn't too revolutionary, but it is likely a good reminder for the technician who has gotten promoted and no longer can be a 'do-er.' It encourages managers to back off, stop micromanaging, foster trust and promote reliance on the team's talent. Orchestrate and facilitate, care for your people, and stop doing their work.
With seven main themes, the author tries to show how to 'do nothing' and lead more: focus on them, start at the end, trust more, release control (deviously), bear down warmly, ignore performance goals, and de-emphasize profits.
The author uses historical and anecdotal examples to highlight the principles he presents in the book. The examples are interesting, but not always as successful as the author had hoped. I appreciate the historical lesson of the failure of Britain's appeasement strategy to constrain Germany's ambition for conquering Europe (pp. 35-38). I'm not sure that it really applies to most people, however, and a failure to negotiate on the world's stage is not necessarily the same in a business context.
I found this book at the Pentagon library and I was intrigued by the title. Unfortunately, I am more of a worker bee and less of a 'leader' there, so I don't really have the chance to implement this concept at work, but I can see the benefits in general and appreciate the message. I think the book is a bit redundant in places for such a simple message, but I suppose the author needed to have some length to the book to make it appear more credible. It would be nice, however, if some of the senior leaders there took this lesson to heart.
I have to admit that I got confused when he started discussing "Five Natural Problems of Individuals as Leaders" (pp. 40-45). He doesn't actually list or explain these five problems, although there is a depiction that I guess labels them. Instead, he dives right into solving them, but it all feels like he's missing a huge chunk of his manuscript. It's not entirely coherent, and I spent far too much time rereading previous pages trying to figure out what I missed and where I got off track. I was trying to read the book fairly quickly, almost skimming the pages to get the gist of the concepts, but I was still as perplexed when I went back and reread the confusing pages. That's when I started considering rating the book a bit lower.
In the end, I gave it a typical 3-star rating. I liked it, but I didn't love it. I do hope to
interesting quotes:
."..teams can benefit enormously when their leaders have high, positive expectations. This should be a consistent message. It's also a message that you don't have to convey verbally. If you consistently have high standards and you are committed to them, your team members will get the message and will do their best to reach them. And getting this message across doesn't require that you do anything - your team members will get a good sense of how you feel from your everyday, high-standard activities." (p. 16)
"...not only do we often find what we are looking for in people, we sometimes create what we are looking for in people." (p. 41)
"...bad outcomes tend to seriously outweigh comparable good outcomes because they are vivid, available events. Our memories are not egalitarian: we remember events that stand out, and negatives stand out much more than positives do. This is particularly true for people who have trusted and been burned: trust violations are vivid, emotionally charged events. As a result, they affect us deeply and they influence our subsequent decision making much more than positive outcomes do." (p. 83)
"So how do you balance your position of authority with your need to know them as people? Here's my standard rule, explained in an example: by all means socialize with your team members, Every so often take them out for a drink on a Friday afternoon. Talk about local community events, sports, the economy - you name it. You can even talk about work.
Buy them the first round. Also buy them the second round, but don't buy a second drink for yourself. Instead, take this as your time to leave. (Your timing doesn't have to be strict; this is just a general recipe.) Why? Most of the time, you should be the first person on your team to leave this kind of social event so that your team members can talk among themselves more comfortably." (p. 134)
"Everyone starts out with opportunity: some people start out with more, others with less. Although being blessed with a great genetic structure, strong parents, and a supportive developmental environment certainly helps, achieving greatness as a leader also takes diligence, learning from experience, constantly seeking information and insights, and making the effort to grow." (p. 149)