DNF, so no rating
I made it about 340 pages into the slightly over 700 page Sam Gunn Omnibus. I don't like DNFing at nearly 50%, but I decided to read something else to give me a breather and remembered, Oh right, reading is supposed to be fun, not a chore. But I'm reviewing it anyway because 1. I've already dedicated a lot of time to reading that first half of the book. 2. As a collection of themed short stories, I feel like I've got a pretty good grasp on what's going on.
The frame story finds an investigative reporter interviewing people who knew Sam Gunn, a space capitalist, adventurer, and general nuisance. The short stories, then, are these interviewee's first hand accounts of working with and around Sam.
The idea itself is fine. Some characters are simply seen better through other people's eyes, so seeing a main character from this offset point of view is kinda neat. However, there's a big problem in this case: The interview subjects need to feel like they have a unique point of view while telling their story. Instead, author Ben Bova slips into a writing voice that, despite using a first person point of view, seems more like detached third person narrative writing. To put it into easier terminology, there's nothing unique about the way any of these interviewees tell their stories. They all use the same voice. So while the "I" in one story refers to a male Captain who finds Sam irritating, and in another "I" is the daughter of a South American president tasked with assassinating Gunn, the difference is one of details rather than actual point of view. Or, put another way, you should be able to feel the unique personality of the character telling the story by the way they tell their story, not just through the "age, sex, occupation, location" that represent the "I."
Ok. There is one thing that comes through pretty strongly: Sexual attraction. Particularly from the women, though even the male narrators will make sure to throw in some comment about who all Sam is, was, or soon will be fucking. This feels less like the success of a differing point of view than it is an indicator of the old sexist trope of women existing for men and a throwback to fiction that revels in dudes who score often.
Admittedly, there have been some standout stories that I liked. I mean, the aforementioned princess assassin story is one that I found myself wishing was a full length novel on its own. Preferably with a better writer, though I guess Bova's shortfalls in POV would matter much less in a full length novel.
Another thing I'd take out of the standout stories is Sam Gunn himself. Look, I can feel the kind of character Bova was going for with Sam. The charming imp with a bit of a roguish streak that tiptoes legality. But here's the problem: Sam Gunn is clever, but not smart. So he can turn water into wine (or, fuel into alcohol as in the introductory story), but his big schemes run heavy on the idealistic bravado that's hard to convert into reality (as with his dream of a honeymoon hotel in space). And so because so many of these stories focus on harebrained ideas that rely on schmoozing investors and fooling clients, he just comes across like a run-of-the-mill conman. I spent about the first 1/4th of the book thinking that the 3rd person POV on Sam was to the book's detriment, then Bova gives us a chapter from Sam's POV and he becomes even more unlikable.
Of what I read, I would rate The Sam Gunn Omnibus at two stars. If it was 200 pages shorter, I'd probably muscle through and finish it. But it's not shorter. So no rating.