Papalism. A treatise on the claims of the papacy as set forth in the encyclical Satis Cognitum. 1912 [Leather Bound]

by Denny Edward

{ 14.60 x 22.86 cms} Leather Binding on Spine and Corners with Golden Leaf Printing on round Spine (extra customization on request like complete leather, Golden Screen printing in Front, Color Leather, Colored book etc.) Reprinted in 2022 with the help of original edition published long back [1912]. This book is printed in black & white, sewing binding for longer life, printed on high quality Paper, re-sized as per Current standards, professionally processed without changing its contents. As these are old books, we processed each page manually and make them readable but in some cases some pages which are blur or missing or black spots. If it is multi volume set, then it is only single volume. We expect that you will understand our compulsion in these books. We found this book important for the readers who want to know more about our old treasure so we brought it back to the shelves. Hope you will like it and give your comments and suggestions. - English, Pages 788. COMPLETE LEATHER WILL COST YOU EXTRA US$ 25 APART FROM THE LEATHER BOUND BOOKS. {FOLIO EDITION IS ALSO AVAILABLE.} . Complete Papalism. A treatise on the claims of the papacy as set forth in the encyclical Satis Cognitum. 1912 [Leather Bound] Denny Edward

Genres: Theology

788 pages, Leather Bound

First published September 3, 2013

Reviews

[Joseph · Rating 5 out of 5]

History is full of inconvenient truths - but we don't know if we don't look. This comprehensive review of the canons of Vatican I and Leo XIII's Papal Encyclical, Satis Cognitum, lays them all bare. In a time when there was no internet, Edward Denny must have committed months to acquiring copies of the cited texts and checking the content and context against the claims of Rome about the historical doctrine of the church.

Many of my Catholic friends mention that dogma develops "as a germ", then grow over time. However, when the official canons and encyclicals claim that a doctrine existed as "the venerable and constant belief of every age", the historical evidence must support such claims. When it doesn't, as it clearly does not in the claim of papal supremacy, what do you do with Rome when its magisterium clearly and deliberately propagates such self-serving untruth?

In a time when the corruption of the church leadership has been so clearly exposed in its self-serving, self-promoting, and self-protecting behavior, perhaps people will be willing to examine such claims themselves - and find the same motivations of the powerful within. I'm thankful for Forgotten Books' reprint of this text.