What do you think?
Rate this book
Din intelligente krop
146 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2011
5 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 of 1 review
April 18, 2012
This Danish translation of a Swedish book is an introduction to meta medicine. It is the first book on the subject that I have read. The title of the book in English when translated is "Your intelligent body".
I can't say that I have completely understood what meta medicine is all about. But I can here present the basics of it, as far as I understand them to be. (Though I don't promise that what I write will be completely accurate, since the subject is new to me, its precepts appear to be in opposition to all that we have before believed about illness/disease and their cure, and I personally didn't find that the book was presented in such a manner as to clarify the significance of all this new information.
According to the author, it is illegal to talk about meta medicine in Austria and perhaps other countries too. (So that is a primary indication for me that it must contain some exciting truth!).
The meta medicine model is a diagnostic tool to help us identify where we are in a disease process. The author states that the model also explains how we can regain our health, but personally I haven't learnt anything about this from the book.
Meta medicine is based on the work of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer. Dr. Hamer's son was shot at the age of 17 and died "in his father's arms". Dr. Hamer had always been healthy, but six months later he developed testicular cancer, and he then began to examine the possibility of a connection between his developing this form of cancer and the death of his son.
After having examined 31,000 patients, he concluded that serious diseases start with a "conflict shock" for which we are completely unprepared.
I have definitely not been able to find any "conflict shock" in my own case, even though I have developed several serious illnesses. This doesn't invalidate the theory of meta medicine of course, since this could be due to lack of insight on my part.
I found the book very technical and difficult to digest, so I will be trying to find other books, in English, that better explain the subject.
As regards the "conflict shock", this contains the following factors (none of which were present in my case): 1) Something unexpected happens 2) The event of dramatic 3) It entails isolation from others and 4) The person affected has no strategy to deal with the event.
CT-scanning reveals ring formations in various areas of the brain that relate to the "conflict shock" (examples are shown in the book).
Many case histories are included. The process is divided into eight biological phases, though I think a mistake may have occurred in the listing of these eight phases, since "healing phase" occurs twice, and in the explanation of these points I can find only seven phases.
The author coins a new word for the "conflict solution" phase - she terms it "soulution". By this she means a soul solution involving a conscious releasing of the feeling triggered by the conflict.
The book contains several diagrams and lists. I did not find the list of symptoms relating to conflict/conflict phase/healing phase at the end of the book at all enlightening - it was in fact confusing.
One of the basic factors that I got from the book was that the healing phase often included cancer, and appeared worse than the conflict phase. I didn't understand how one was to survive the cancer, and in fact as far as I understand, one often didn't. Meta medicine is, after all, a diagnostic process and apparently does not include any guidelines for actively healing oneself.
I know that one can often be emotionally healed, or healed in some other non-physical way before dying, but I don't understand how one can be physically healed, if the process ends in biological death.
I feel that this whole meta medicine concept must absolutely be in its infancy, and requires much more research and theoretical explanations before it can become entirely understandable, acceptable and useful for the general public.
In conclusion I would state that the book provides an idea about what meta medicine is about, but I did not find it to give a clear presentation of meta medicine. In fact I found it depressing to read about all the various negative symptoms without a corresponding explanation about what to do about them. Thus, I can't really recommend the book.
I can't say that I have completely understood what meta medicine is all about. But I can here present the basics of it, as far as I understand them to be. (Though I don't promise that what I write will be completely accurate, since the subject is new to me, its precepts appear to be in opposition to all that we have before believed about illness/disease and their cure, and I personally didn't find that the book was presented in such a manner as to clarify the significance of all this new information.
According to the author, it is illegal to talk about meta medicine in Austria and perhaps other countries too. (So that is a primary indication for me that it must contain some exciting truth!).
The meta medicine model is a diagnostic tool to help us identify where we are in a disease process. The author states that the model also explains how we can regain our health, but personally I haven't learnt anything about this from the book.
Meta medicine is based on the work of Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer. Dr. Hamer's son was shot at the age of 17 and died "in his father's arms". Dr. Hamer had always been healthy, but six months later he developed testicular cancer, and he then began to examine the possibility of a connection between his developing this form of cancer and the death of his son.
After having examined 31,000 patients, he concluded that serious diseases start with a "conflict shock" for which we are completely unprepared.
I have definitely not been able to find any "conflict shock" in my own case, even though I have developed several serious illnesses. This doesn't invalidate the theory of meta medicine of course, since this could be due to lack of insight on my part.
I found the book very technical and difficult to digest, so I will be trying to find other books, in English, that better explain the subject.
As regards the "conflict shock", this contains the following factors (none of which were present in my case): 1) Something unexpected happens 2) The event of dramatic 3) It entails isolation from others and 4) The person affected has no strategy to deal with the event.
CT-scanning reveals ring formations in various areas of the brain that relate to the "conflict shock" (examples are shown in the book).
Many case histories are included. The process is divided into eight biological phases, though I think a mistake may have occurred in the listing of these eight phases, since "healing phase" occurs twice, and in the explanation of these points I can find only seven phases.
The author coins a new word for the "conflict solution" phase - she terms it "soulution". By this she means a soul solution involving a conscious releasing of the feeling triggered by the conflict.
The book contains several diagrams and lists. I did not find the list of symptoms relating to conflict/conflict phase/healing phase at the end of the book at all enlightening - it was in fact confusing.
One of the basic factors that I got from the book was that the healing phase often included cancer, and appeared worse than the conflict phase. I didn't understand how one was to survive the cancer, and in fact as far as I understand, one often didn't. Meta medicine is, after all, a diagnostic process and apparently does not include any guidelines for actively healing oneself.
I know that one can often be emotionally healed, or healed in some other non-physical way before dying, but I don't understand how one can be physically healed, if the process ends in biological death.
I feel that this whole meta medicine concept must absolutely be in its infancy, and requires much more research and theoretical explanations before it can become entirely understandable, acceptable and useful for the general public.
In conclusion I would state that the book provides an idea about what meta medicine is about, but I did not find it to give a clear presentation of meta medicine. In fact I found it depressing to read about all the various negative symptoms without a corresponding explanation about what to do about them. Thus, I can't really recommend the book.
Displaying 1 of 1 review