What do you think?
Rate this book
The Importance of Being Earnest and Other Plays
Enriched Classics offer readers accessible editions of great works of literature enhanced by helpful notes and commentary. Each book includes educational tools alongside the text, enabling students and readers alike to gain a deeper and more developed understanding of the writer and their work.
Wilde's classic comedy of manners, The Importance of Being Earnest, a satire of Victorian social hypocrisy and considered Wilde's greatest dramatic achievement, and his other popular plays--Lady Windermere's Fan, An Ideal Husband, and Salome--challenged contemporary notions of sex and sensibility, class and cultural identity.
Enriched Classics enhance your engagement by introducing and explaining the historical and cultural significance of the work, the author's personal history, and what impact this book had on subsequent scholarship. Each book includes discussion questions that help clarify and reinforce major themes and reading recommendations for further research.
Read with confidence.
Wilde's classic comedy of manners, The Importance of Being Earnest, a satire of Victorian social hypocrisy and considered Wilde's greatest dramatic achievement, and his other popular plays--Lady Windermere's Fan, An Ideal Husband, and Salome--challenged contemporary notions of sex and sensibility, class and cultural identity.
Enriched Classics enhance your engagement by introducing and explaining the historical and cultural significance of the work, the author's personal history, and what impact this book had on subsequent scholarship. Each book includes discussion questions that help clarify and reinforce major themes and reading recommendations for further research.
Read with confidence.
400 pages, Mass Market Paperback
First published January 1, 1898
643 people are currently reading
30113 people want to read
About the author
Oscar Wilde
5,531 books39k followersOscar Fingal O'Fflahertie Wills Wilde was an Irish poet and playwright. After writing in different forms throughout the 1880s, he became one of the most popular playwrights in London in the early 1890s. He is best remembered for his epigrams and plays, his novel The Picture of Dorian Gray, and his criminal conviction for gross indecency for homosexual acts.
Wilde's parents were Anglo-Irish intellectuals in Dublin. In his youth, Wilde learned to speak fluent French and German. At university, he read Greats; he demonstrated himself to be an exceptional classicist, first at Trinity College Dublin, then at Magdalen College, Oxford. He became associated with the emerging philosophy of aestheticism, led by two of his tutors, Walter Pater and John Ruskin. After university, Wilde moved to London into fashionable cultural and social circles.
Wilde tried his hand at various literary activities: he wrote a play, published a book of poems, lectured in the United States and Canada on "The English Renaissance" in art and interior decoration, and then returned to London where he lectured on his American travels and wrote reviews for various periodicals. Known for his biting wit, flamboyant dress and glittering conversational skill, Wilde became one of the best-known personalities of his day. At the turn of the 1890s, he refined his ideas about the supremacy of art in a series of dialogues and essays, and incorporated themes of decadence, duplicity, and beauty into what would be his only novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890). Wilde returned to drama, writing Salome (1891) in French while in Paris, but it was refused a licence for England due to an absolute prohibition on the portrayal of Biblical subjects on the English stage. Undiscouraged, Wilde produced four society comedies in the early 1890s, which made him one of the most successful playwrights of late-Victorian London.
At the height of his fame and success, while An Ideal Husband (1895) and The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) were still being performed in London, Wilde issued a civil writ against John Sholto Douglas, the 9th Marquess of Queensberry for criminal libel. The Marquess was the father of Wilde's lover, Lord Alfred Douglas. The libel hearings unearthed evidence that caused Wilde to drop his charges and led to his own arrest and criminal prosecution for gross indecency with other males. The jury was unable to reach a verdict and so a retrial was ordered. In the second trial Wilde was convicted and sentenced to two years' hard labour, the maximum penalty, and was jailed from 1895 to 1897. During his last year in prison he wrote De Profundis (published posthumously in abridged form in 1905), a long letter that discusses his spiritual journey through his trials and is a dark counterpoint to his earlier philosophy of pleasure. On the day of his release, he caught the overnight steamer to France, never to return to Britain or Ireland. In France and Italy, he wrote his last work, The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898), a long poem commemorating the harsh rhythms of prison life.
Wilde's parents were Anglo-Irish intellectuals in Dublin. In his youth, Wilde learned to speak fluent French and German. At university, he read Greats; he demonstrated himself to be an exceptional classicist, first at Trinity College Dublin, then at Magdalen College, Oxford. He became associated with the emerging philosophy of aestheticism, led by two of his tutors, Walter Pater and John Ruskin. After university, Wilde moved to London into fashionable cultural and social circles.
Wilde tried his hand at various literary activities: he wrote a play, published a book of poems, lectured in the United States and Canada on "The English Renaissance" in art and interior decoration, and then returned to London where he lectured on his American travels and wrote reviews for various periodicals. Known for his biting wit, flamboyant dress and glittering conversational skill, Wilde became one of the best-known personalities of his day. At the turn of the 1890s, he refined his ideas about the supremacy of art in a series of dialogues and essays, and incorporated themes of decadence, duplicity, and beauty into what would be his only novel, The Picture of Dorian Gray (1890). Wilde returned to drama, writing Salome (1891) in French while in Paris, but it was refused a licence for England due to an absolute prohibition on the portrayal of Biblical subjects on the English stage. Undiscouraged, Wilde produced four society comedies in the early 1890s, which made him one of the most successful playwrights of late-Victorian London.
At the height of his fame and success, while An Ideal Husband (1895) and The Importance of Being Earnest (1895) were still being performed in London, Wilde issued a civil writ against John Sholto Douglas, the 9th Marquess of Queensberry for criminal libel. The Marquess was the father of Wilde's lover, Lord Alfred Douglas. The libel hearings unearthed evidence that caused Wilde to drop his charges and led to his own arrest and criminal prosecution for gross indecency with other males. The jury was unable to reach a verdict and so a retrial was ordered. In the second trial Wilde was convicted and sentenced to two years' hard labour, the maximum penalty, and was jailed from 1895 to 1897. During his last year in prison he wrote De Profundis (published posthumously in abridged form in 1905), a long letter that discusses his spiritual journey through his trials and is a dark counterpoint to his earlier philosophy of pleasure. On the day of his release, he caught the overnight steamer to France, never to return to Britain or Ireland. In France and Italy, he wrote his last work, The Ballad of Reading Gaol (1898), a long poem commemorating the harsh rhythms of prison life.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,008 reviews
January 3, 2026
In The Importance of Being Ernest, Oscar Wilde revisits and revitalizes the long theatrical tradition of the quiproquo, I would say, "Italian style." It is a light and lively comedy, as were its predecessors in the Commedia dell Arte, but where the clowns are English dandies, the acid lines are more reminiscent of Chekhov than Goldoni.
You have understood that throughout this comedy in four acts, Wilde will play on the ambiguity of this word. The two main protagonists, Jack and Algernon, two single dandies enjoying the British aristocracy of the late 19th century, use a similar process to extricate themselves from family and strategic imperatives.
Whether it is Bunbury or Ernest, the pretext is mainly used to escape obligations that young men find annoying or, in the most frequent case, to go and tell a little charming young lady without hope of tomorrow.
However, well aware of their friend's reciprocal infidelity, Jack and Algernon begin to see red when they realize that one is too interested in the other's cousin and that the latter is engaged to the former's pupil.
We are, therefore, entitled to a perfectly symmetrical and very artificial crossed construction. Moreover, more and more contrived as we advance in the play, which, rare enough to be mentioned, is not embarrassing. We see things happening that are as big as a truck but done on purpose.
Oscar Wilde seems to care madly whether his play looks believable; he wants entertainment, good lines, a style, and fun that makes us happy.
The only problem for Jack is that he has the lightness to pretend around him that he is going to his brother Ernest's bedside while never getting too involved with women. He is passed off to Gwendolen, whom he now really loves, and to Ernest.
Knowing that the cunning Algernon does not shrink from any deception to be able to approach Cecily, Jack's ward, it is quite possible that he, too, could pass himself off as Ernest. Hence, the title is essential for an excellent understanding of the play.
In short, it is good entertainment, with some rather funny passages and a few pokes thrown here and there from De Wilde to the society of his time. A few little kicks in the anthills, and then that's it, because this play probably doesn't have a lot of other hidden ambitions. Getting people to talk about her at the time, shocking her contemporaries, and creating a buzz, as we would say today. Still, from there, when perceiving an intense and structured social criticism, the author seemed not to want to be "earnest." But this is, of course, only my opinion, that is to say, very little.
You have understood that throughout this comedy in four acts, Wilde will play on the ambiguity of this word. The two main protagonists, Jack and Algernon, two single dandies enjoying the British aristocracy of the late 19th century, use a similar process to extricate themselves from family and strategic imperatives.
Whether it is Bunbury or Ernest, the pretext is mainly used to escape obligations that young men find annoying or, in the most frequent case, to go and tell a little charming young lady without hope of tomorrow.
However, well aware of their friend's reciprocal infidelity, Jack and Algernon begin to see red when they realize that one is too interested in the other's cousin and that the latter is engaged to the former's pupil.
We are, therefore, entitled to a perfectly symmetrical and very artificial crossed construction. Moreover, more and more contrived as we advance in the play, which, rare enough to be mentioned, is not embarrassing. We see things happening that are as big as a truck but done on purpose.
Oscar Wilde seems to care madly whether his play looks believable; he wants entertainment, good lines, a style, and fun that makes us happy.
The only problem for Jack is that he has the lightness to pretend around him that he is going to his brother Ernest's bedside while never getting too involved with women. He is passed off to Gwendolen, whom he now really loves, and to Ernest.
Knowing that the cunning Algernon does not shrink from any deception to be able to approach Cecily, Jack's ward, it is quite possible that he, too, could pass himself off as Ernest. Hence, the title is essential for an excellent understanding of the play.
In short, it is good entertainment, with some rather funny passages and a few pokes thrown here and there from De Wilde to the society of his time. A few little kicks in the anthills, and then that's it, because this play probably doesn't have a lot of other hidden ambitions. Getting people to talk about her at the time, shocking her contemporaries, and creating a buzz, as we would say today. Still, from there, when perceiving an intense and structured social criticism, the author seemed not to want to be "earnest." But this is, of course, only my opinion, that is to say, very little.
July 17, 2023
Unexpectedly hilarious! It was so surprising how much of the humor translated to current times. Delightfully fun.
I weirdly loved this. But I honestly went into it randomly with very low expectations.
I love witty sarcasm, and Oscar Wilde was chock full of it!
5 Stars
I weirdly loved this. But I honestly went into it randomly with very low expectations.
I love witty sarcasm, and Oscar Wilde was chock full of it!
5 Stars
November 30, 2018
I used to be an inveterate playgoer (one year, 1989 I think, I saw 52 plays).
The action and dialog on stage can be pretty quick. And if you're seeing a play that was written in another time for a different culture, that might be too quick to catch.
For example, the first line of Lady Windermere's Fan is from a butler stepping up to the lady of the house and asking "Is your ladyship at home this afternoon?" Our modern minds would probably surmise from such a question that the butler is asking whether the lady was going out later. But no: the question is asking whether she is receiving visitors at this moment. The notes tell me that this would have been a clue to Victorian audiences that someone is calling that causes social difficulties for the butler... in fact, it is a—*gasp*—man to whom the lady is neither married nor related!
This is why commentary is so valuable when we're bridging cultures. It's all very nice to dive straight into Shakespeare and claim to "get it", for example, but how many of our contemporaries would quickly grasp that a "moveable", for example, is an old term for a small piece of furniture? If you are going to get all of the jokes in Taming of the Shrew, that's something you'll need to be aware of as the banter zips by.
Oscar Wilde is closer to us in time but even better known for his subversive use of humor, so a guide is just as valuable. Don't believe me? Take this quiz. Here's some dialog (middle of the second Act of Lady Windermere's Fan). Hint: Mrs Erlynne is a figure of scandal; nothing has been made too explicit yet, but it seems she might have committed adultery!:
.
.
.
Time's up. The answer: "My dear Laura". Use of her given name indicates this couple is having an adulterous affair of their own! And yet here they are discussing the moral foibles of others with much amused cynicism and very little sympathy.
Conclusion: Read the play. Read the notes and commentary. Go see the play. Repeat as necessary.
Lady Windermere's Fan : Leaving the beneficiary of a sacrifice ignorant is somehow more graceful. I liked this one.
Salome : Very strange. It felt like a play from a different time, and a different author. The others (at least so far) have been plays of manners, with a hidden examination of morality and hypocrisy. Salome is more impressionistic and abstract; the treatment seems more amenable to the opera it later became.
A Woman of No Importance : Far too preachy, it seemed much more amateurish than Lady Windermere's Fan. Entire pages devoted to overwrought monologue, and others devoted to one-sided dialogues, where one character acts the straight man for the other's constant stream of aphorisms and quips, which in the end signify nothing.
An Ideal Husband : Curious how almost all of Wilde's plays deal with infidelity. This one has a femme fatale, but it is about a fallen man, not a fallen woman. Good and possibly better crafted, but therefore not as juicy.
A Florentine Tragedy : Short and excellent. A deadly ménage à trois, very tense in its few pages.
The Importance of Being Earnest : When absorbed after the forgoing, this play is that much more impressive. It is certainly more enjoyable—a condensed nugget of brilliant cleverness—but it also is remarkably different.
Besides this one, all of Wilde's plays deal, to some extent, with the transgression of social norms, and specifically with disgrace. They are also all more dramatic. Even those that are arguably comedies have a tension borne of the fear of disgrace, and the maneuvering to evade it. (Well, A Florentine Tragedy isn't actually about avoiding it, but artfully confirming it.)
In Earnest, the tension is completely absent. It would be difficult to imagine a more innocuous play. Or one so charmingly silly. How and why Wilde came up with the forename "Earnest" as the target surname is quite miraculous. I suppose in 1895 the name might have actually been quite popular. In the United States at the time it was the 24th most popular name (see WolframAlpha), and has suffered ever since.
As the dictionary illustrates:
It is too bad Wilde didn't take his own advice. Even though we now think of him as the personification of the dandy, if he had merely averted his eyes from the unpleasantness of the Marquess he wouldn't have come to the unpleasant fate that he did.
In reading The Importance of Being Earnest, again the footnotes were helpful, but less so. The usage of given names and more formal surnames was highlighted, and quite deliciously so. The two young women adroitly switch usage back and forth to punish, reward, fend off, tease and prod their men, and each other.
My favorite character was Cecily. Despite the handicap of being raised in the country, she has somehow manage to elevate herself to the same level of cleverness as her city counterpart, Gwendolyn.
About that cleverness. We aren't very clever these days, I think. Or at least not in that ironic way Wilde and Dorothy Parker made so infamous. And while it is a marvelous thing to witness from a distance, I'm fairly sure I don't regret its absence. In both Wilde's and Parker's eras the mores and standards of the day were like protected but weak currencies — a few risky artistes profited greatly in arbitrage shortly before those unsustainable parts of their society collapsed. That we don't have a tiny and irrelevant subculture throwing mordantly funny barbs at the rest of society probably means that, for all our faults, we're not yet ripe for revolution.
Ah, my favorite quote:
The action and dialog on stage can be pretty quick. And if you're seeing a play that was written in another time for a different culture, that might be too quick to catch.
For example, the first line of Lady Windermere's Fan is from a butler stepping up to the lady of the house and asking "Is your ladyship at home this afternoon?" Our modern minds would probably surmise from such a question that the butler is asking whether the lady was going out later. But no: the question is asking whether she is receiving visitors at this moment. The notes tell me that this would have been a clue to Victorian audiences that someone is calling that causes social difficulties for the butler... in fact, it is a—*gasp*—man to whom the lady is neither married nor related!
This is why commentary is so valuable when we're bridging cultures. It's all very nice to dive straight into Shakespeare and claim to "get it", for example, but how many of our contemporaries would quickly grasp that a "moveable", for example, is an old term for a small piece of furniture? If you are going to get all of the jokes in Taming of the Shrew, that's something you'll need to be aware of as the banter zips by.
Oscar Wilde is closer to us in time but even better known for his subversive use of humor, so a guide is just as valuable. Don't believe me? Take this quiz. Here's some dialog (middle of the second Act of Lady Windermere's Fan). Hint: Mrs Erlynne is a figure of scandal; nothing has been made too explicit yet, but it seems she might have committed adultery!:
Lady Plymdale [to Mr. Dumby]: What an absolute brute you are! I never can believe a word you say! Why did you tell me you didn't know her? What do you mean by calling on her three times running? You are not going to lunch there; of course you understand that?Okay, what was subversive in this snippet?
Dumby: My dear Laura, I wouldn't dream of going!
Lady Plymdale: You haven't told me her name yet! Who is she?
Dumby: [coughs slightly and smooths his hair]: She's a Mrs Erlynne.
Lady Plymdale: That woman!
Dumby: Yes, that is what everyone calls her.
Lady Plymdale: How very interesting! How intensely interesting! I really must have a good stare at her. [Goes to the ball-room and looks in.] I have heard the most shocking things about her. They say she is ruining poor Windermere. And Lady Windermere, who goes in for being so proper, invites her! How extremely amusing! It takes a thoroughly good woman to do a thoroughly stupid thing. You are to lunch there on Friday!
.
.
.
Time's up. The answer: "My dear Laura". Use of her given name indicates this couple is having an adulterous affair of their own! And yet here they are discussing the moral foibles of others with much amused cynicism and very little sympathy.
Conclusion: Read the play. Read the notes and commentary. Go see the play. Repeat as necessary.
Lady Windermere's Fan : Leaving the beneficiary of a sacrifice ignorant is somehow more graceful. I liked this one.
Salome : Very strange. It felt like a play from a different time, and a different author. The others (at least so far) have been plays of manners, with a hidden examination of morality and hypocrisy. Salome is more impressionistic and abstract; the treatment seems more amenable to the opera it later became.
A Woman of No Importance : Far too preachy, it seemed much more amateurish than Lady Windermere's Fan. Entire pages devoted to overwrought monologue, and others devoted to one-sided dialogues, where one character acts the straight man for the other's constant stream of aphorisms and quips, which in the end signify nothing.
An Ideal Husband : Curious how almost all of Wilde's plays deal with infidelity. This one has a femme fatale, but it is about a fallen man, not a fallen woman. Good and possibly better crafted, but therefore not as juicy.
A Florentine Tragedy : Short and excellent. A deadly ménage à trois, very tense in its few pages.
The Importance of Being Earnest : When absorbed after the forgoing, this play is that much more impressive. It is certainly more enjoyable—a condensed nugget of brilliant cleverness—but it also is remarkably different.
Besides this one, all of Wilde's plays deal, to some extent, with the transgression of social norms, and specifically with disgrace. They are also all more dramatic. Even those that are arguably comedies have a tension borne of the fear of disgrace, and the maneuvering to evade it. (Well, A Florentine Tragedy isn't actually about avoiding it, but artfully confirming it.)
In Earnest, the tension is completely absent. It would be difficult to imagine a more innocuous play. Or one so charmingly silly. How and why Wilde came up with the forename "Earnest" as the target surname is quite miraculous. I suppose in 1895 the name might have actually been quite popular. In the United States at the time it was the 24th most popular name (see WolframAlpha), and has suffered ever since.
As the dictionary illustrates:
ear⋅nest /ˈur-nist/The philosophy of the play is that of the dandy, someone with eyes steadily averted from anything serious and turned, instead, towards one's own (and lesser, one's friend's) superficial pleasantness. Definitely not earnest.
–adjective
1. serious in intention, purpose, or effort; sincerely zealous: an earnest worker.
2. showing depth and sincerity of feeling: earnest words; an earnest entreaty.
3. seriously important; demanding or receiving serious attention.
–noun
4. full seriousness, as of intention or purpose: to speak in earnest.
It is too bad Wilde didn't take his own advice. Even though we now think of him as the personification of the dandy, if he had merely averted his eyes from the unpleasantness of the Marquess he wouldn't have come to the unpleasant fate that he did.
In reading The Importance of Being Earnest, again the footnotes were helpful, but less so. The usage of given names and more formal surnames was highlighted, and quite deliciously so. The two young women adroitly switch usage back and forth to punish, reward, fend off, tease and prod their men, and each other.
My favorite character was Cecily. Despite the handicap of being raised in the country, she has somehow manage to elevate herself to the same level of cleverness as her city counterpart, Gwendolyn.
About that cleverness. We aren't very clever these days, I think. Or at least not in that ironic way Wilde and Dorothy Parker made so infamous. And while it is a marvelous thing to witness from a distance, I'm fairly sure I don't regret its absence. In both Wilde's and Parker's eras the mores and standards of the day were like protected but weak currencies — a few risky artistes profited greatly in arbitrage shortly before those unsustainable parts of their society collapsed. That we don't have a tiny and irrelevant subculture throwing mordantly funny barbs at the rest of society probably means that, for all our faults, we're not yet ripe for revolution.
Ah, my favorite quote:
Jack: I am sick to death of cleverness. Everybody is clever nowadays. You can't go anywhere without meeting clever people. The thing has become an absolute public nuisance. I wish to goodness we had a few fools left.
Algernon: We have.
Jack: I should extremely like to meet them. What do they talk about?
Algernon: The fools? Oh! about the clever people, of course.
Jack: What fools!
January 7, 2013
"Prism, where is that baby?" demands the damndest dowager in theatre history in OWs farcical masterpiece. Feeling blue ? Reread this comedic milestone for the most preposterous merriment outside of Noel Coward's "Blithe Spirit," with a bow to WS Gilbert and Sheridan. Wilde found his playwrighting voice just before The Fall. He turned unreal drawing-room nonsense into Art. Muffins, cucumber sandwiches, a handbag left at Victoria Station and a grande dame who burbles about train schedules : "We have already missed five if not six trains. To miss any more might expose us to comment on the platform." Well--it's uproarious.
Basically, OW was a prude, hence he went to court to clear his name. "Earnest," w the central male using a double name (one for London society, another for private weekends), has even been called his true "De Profundis" -- without the sentiment. By contrast, his 3 earlier "comedies" with creaking plots involving blackmail, scandal and duplicity loom as shoddy Victorian mellerdramas redeemed by the brilliance of his epigrams. Wilde uses mellerdrama as an escape, to take him out of himself into a misplaced reality.
In "Lady Windermere's Fan," the cynical repartee covers the sticky sentimentalism in which the "bad" woman turns out to be the heroine's Mum. He capably linked his escritoire to the box office. In "An Ideal Husband," it's the hero who has a shady past. High-flying chatter relieves the moralizing. "A Woman of No Importance" shows off his worst writing and finest wit : "The Book of Life begins with a man and a woman in a garden; it ends with Revelations." His plot turns on smother love when the Mum who erred cries out to her son, "How could I repent of my sin when you, my love, were its fruit." O, Oscar.
All in all, OW was surely a good-natured gent without malice or spite. At the time of His Fall he was the reigning Playwright and Personality in London. A worldly superstar, he toyed with a deep fear of scandal in 3 plays while the characters seek to protect their social position and careers. After "Earnest," which tossed a concern for provincial virtue into the dustbin, we can only guess at the OW comedies that never got written.
Basically, OW was a prude, hence he went to court to clear his name. "Earnest," w the central male using a double name (one for London society, another for private weekends), has even been called his true "De Profundis" -- without the sentiment. By contrast, his 3 earlier "comedies" with creaking plots involving blackmail, scandal and duplicity loom as shoddy Victorian mellerdramas redeemed by the brilliance of his epigrams. Wilde uses mellerdrama as an escape, to take him out of himself into a misplaced reality.
In "Lady Windermere's Fan," the cynical repartee covers the sticky sentimentalism in which the "bad" woman turns out to be the heroine's Mum. He capably linked his escritoire to the box office. In "An Ideal Husband," it's the hero who has a shady past. High-flying chatter relieves the moralizing. "A Woman of No Importance" shows off his worst writing and finest wit : "The Book of Life begins with a man and a woman in a garden; it ends with Revelations." His plot turns on smother love when the Mum who erred cries out to her son, "How could I repent of my sin when you, my love, were its fruit." O, Oscar.
All in all, OW was surely a good-natured gent without malice or spite. At the time of His Fall he was the reigning Playwright and Personality in London. A worldly superstar, he toyed with a deep fear of scandal in 3 plays while the characters seek to protect their social position and careers. After "Earnest," which tossed a concern for provincial virtue into the dustbin, we can only guess at the OW comedies that never got written.
March 5, 2020
1. O Leque de Lady Windermere
2. Uma Mulher Sem Importância
3. Um Marido Ideal
4. A Importância de Ser Earnest
são as quatro peças incluídas nesta edição. As minhas preferidas são o "Leque" e o "Earnest" por se focarem mais na intriga e menos nas conversas de sociedade entre Ladies e Gentlemen.
2. Uma Mulher Sem Importância
3. Um Marido Ideal
4. A Importância de Ser Earnest
são as quatro peças incluídas nesta edição. As minhas preferidas são o "Leque" e o "Earnest" por se focarem mais na intriga e menos nas conversas de sociedade entre Ladies e Gentlemen.
October 16, 2018
3.5 stars
I love Oscar Wilde so much and I’m so glad I finally ended up reading his most famous plays, they were so ironic and funny, I also adored the social satire he did. I’d love to see them on stage, it must be amazing.
The Importance of Being Earnest, 4/5 stars
Lady Windermere’s Fan, 4/5 stars
Salomé, 3/5 stars
A Woman of No Importance, 3.5/5 stars
An Ideal Husband, 3.5/5 stars
I love Oscar Wilde so much and I’m so glad I finally ended up reading his most famous plays, they were so ironic and funny, I also adored the social satire he did. I’d love to see them on stage, it must be amazing.
The Importance of Being Earnest, 4/5 stars
Lady Windermere’s Fan, 4/5 stars
Salomé, 3/5 stars
A Woman of No Importance, 3.5/5 stars
An Ideal Husband, 3.5/5 stars
June 18, 2023
This is definitely a classic worth reading. I did not like all plays the same, and my favourite by far is The Importance of Being Earnest. However, there is something witty in all of them, and in some Wilde is pretty ironic in his own very funny way. 5 out of 5 stars
May 3, 2016
So hilarious!
There's this:
“How you can sit there, calmly eating muffins when we are in this horrible trouble, I can’t make out. You seem to me to be perfectly heartless."
"Well, I can’t eat muffins in an agitated manner. The butter would probably get on my cuffs. One should always eat muffins quite calmly. It is the only way to eat them."
"I say it’s perfectly heartless your eating muffins at all, under the circumstances.”
And This:
“To be natural is such a very difficult pose to keep up.”
AND THIS:
“This ghastly state of things is what you call Bunburying, I suppose?
Algernon. Yes, and a perfectly wonderful Bunbury it is. The most wonderful Bunbury I have ever had in my life.
Jack. Well, you've no right whatsoever to Bunbury here.
Algernon. That is absurd. One has a right to Bunbury anywhere one chooses. Every serious Bunburyist knows that.”
AND FINALLY THIS:
“Jack? . . . No, there is very little music in the name Jack, if any at all, indeed. It does not thrill. It produces absolutely no vibrations . . . I have known several Jacks, and they all, without exception, were more than usually plain. Besides, Jack is a notorious domesticity for John! And I pity any woman who is married to a man called John. She would probably never be allowed to know the entrancing pleasure of a single moment’s solitude. The only really safe name is Ernest.”
There's this:
“How you can sit there, calmly eating muffins when we are in this horrible trouble, I can’t make out. You seem to me to be perfectly heartless."
"Well, I can’t eat muffins in an agitated manner. The butter would probably get on my cuffs. One should always eat muffins quite calmly. It is the only way to eat them."
"I say it’s perfectly heartless your eating muffins at all, under the circumstances.”
And This:
“To be natural is such a very difficult pose to keep up.”
AND THIS:
“This ghastly state of things is what you call Bunburying, I suppose?
Algernon. Yes, and a perfectly wonderful Bunbury it is. The most wonderful Bunbury I have ever had in my life.
Jack. Well, you've no right whatsoever to Bunbury here.
Algernon. That is absurd. One has a right to Bunbury anywhere one chooses. Every serious Bunburyist knows that.”
AND FINALLY THIS:
“Jack? . . . No, there is very little music in the name Jack, if any at all, indeed. It does not thrill. It produces absolutely no vibrations . . . I have known several Jacks, and they all, without exception, were more than usually plain. Besides, Jack is a notorious domesticity for John! And I pity any woman who is married to a man called John. She would probably never be allowed to know the entrancing pleasure of a single moment’s solitude. The only really safe name is Ernest.”
August 26, 2021
Me ha parecido una comedia deliciosa que consigue la difícil tarea de que el lector se ría solo. Y no lo hace una vez, me pasé dos tardes de lectura riendo casi sin parar. Esto es muy complicado de conseguir cuando se lee teatro, ya que te falta la 'fisicalidad' y las expresiones del actor. Pero aquí el texto se aguanta en pie solo.
Además del sentido del humor, la obra reserva algunas sorpresas y giros al lector (o espectador) lo que la hace aún más disfrutable.
Me encanta que sea una obra que no se tome en serio a sí misma ya que eso le permite, entre otras cosas, presentar una trama simple y despreocupada y unos personajes bastante planos pero con una vis cómica irresistible.
Sin embargo, es inevitable ver que detrás de ese humor y de ese juego de dobles identidades que presenta la trama se esconde la realidad del propio autor, mucho menos agradable. Y que la doble moral victoriana a la que la obra hace algún guiño se demostró implacable con el propio Wilde, que lo perdió todo justo cuando esta obra arrasaba en Londres.
RESEÑA COMPLETA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwFbw...
Además del sentido del humor, la obra reserva algunas sorpresas y giros al lector (o espectador) lo que la hace aún más disfrutable.
Me encanta que sea una obra que no se tome en serio a sí misma ya que eso le permite, entre otras cosas, presentar una trama simple y despreocupada y unos personajes bastante planos pero con una vis cómica irresistible.
Sin embargo, es inevitable ver que detrás de ese humor y de ese juego de dobles identidades que presenta la trama se esconde la realidad del propio autor, mucho menos agradable. Y que la doble moral victoriana a la que la obra hace algún guiño se demostró implacable con el propio Wilde, que lo perdió todo justo cuando esta obra arrasaba en Londres.
RESEÑA COMPLETA: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XwFbw...
November 27, 2018
Es, sin duda, una obra divertida y llena de absurdos, como también, una clara crítica de la sociedad de su tiempo.
La obra está estructurada en tres actos, y fue estrenada en el teatro de St James en 1895. Poco a poco se van introduciendo los personajes, Jack, quien se ha inventado un hermano llamado Ernesto para poder escapar de las responsabilidades y de su aburrida vida en el campo; y Algernon, que vive en Londres y quien se ha inventado también un personaje para justificar sus escapadas al campo. Ambos hombres se enamoran de dos mujeres que están convencidas de que deben casarse con alguien llamado Ernesto.
Wilde juega a lo largo de la obra con el doble significado de la palabra "Earnest", que significa tanto Ernesto como "formal". La narración está repleta de ironías y sarcasmos que ridiculizan las convenciones sociales tan rígidas de la época y la hipocresía con la que vivían los miembros de la alta sociedad, especialmente en lo referente a la sexualidad y al matrimonio.
"La esencia del romance es la incertidumbre. Si algún día me caso, trataré de olvidarlo."
La obra está estructurada en tres actos, y fue estrenada en el teatro de St James en 1895. Poco a poco se van introduciendo los personajes, Jack, quien se ha inventado un hermano llamado Ernesto para poder escapar de las responsabilidades y de su aburrida vida en el campo; y Algernon, que vive en Londres y quien se ha inventado también un personaje para justificar sus escapadas al campo. Ambos hombres se enamoran de dos mujeres que están convencidas de que deben casarse con alguien llamado Ernesto.
Wilde juega a lo largo de la obra con el doble significado de la palabra "Earnest", que significa tanto Ernesto como "formal". La narración está repleta de ironías y sarcasmos que ridiculizan las convenciones sociales tan rígidas de la época y la hipocresía con la que vivían los miembros de la alta sociedad, especialmente en lo referente a la sexualidad y al matrimonio.
"La esencia del romance es la incertidumbre. Si algún día me caso, trataré de olvidarlo."
November 29, 2021
Tremendous
This book is a collection of several plays by Oscar Wilde The Importance of Being Earnest is the lead play because it is popular in literature. However, there are other plays which are fun and worth exploring.
Oscar Wilde wrote at the end of the 19th century through the beginning of the 20th century and is incredibly adept in the word interplay necessary for each play.
These plays are very light and easy and sometimes pretty funny or sarcastic. I enjoy doing this paragraph
I highly recommend.
This book is a collection of several plays by Oscar Wilde The Importance of Being Earnest is the lead play because it is popular in literature. However, there are other plays which are fun and worth exploring.
Oscar Wilde wrote at the end of the 19th century through the beginning of the 20th century and is incredibly adept in the word interplay necessary for each play.
These plays are very light and easy and sometimes pretty funny or sarcastic. I enjoy doing this paragraph
I highly recommend.
December 2, 2019
I don't read plays. Maybe I am the only human being who hasn't read Shakespeare. I tried. Honesty. When I was a teenager, decided to read Romeo and Juliet. Well, teenager+R&J, quite a good start. I got irritated by Romeo just in the middle of the book and left it. Then I started Hamlet. I don't even remember why I left it.
I hated plays and was getting confused in the list of maybe 20 people presented at the front page of the play. Hated this theatrical long monologues and conversations of 10 people at the same time. I didn't understand why everybody is in love with Shakespeare, why Wilde's gravestone was lipstick-covered?
Why people loved him so much? Ok, The Picture of Dorian Gray was quite a sensation, but, I mean, Shaw's or Shakespeare's graves are free from lipsticks of all possible colors.
And then I read plays of Wilde.
Attention! Do not read this book in transport or in public places, where people can think you are high, because, oh boy, you are going to laugh!
Now I want to go to Paris to leave my kiss for this amazing play writer while he sits there and rolls eyes, saying to himself "one more".
And immediately after that I want to go to GB to see all the plays from this collection played by British actors.
I hated plays and was getting confused in the list of maybe 20 people presented at the front page of the play. Hated this theatrical long monologues and conversations of 10 people at the same time. I didn't understand why everybody is in love with Shakespeare, why Wilde's gravestone was lipstick-covered?
Why people loved him so much? Ok, The Picture of Dorian Gray was quite a sensation, but, I mean, Shaw's or Shakespeare's graves are free from lipsticks of all possible colors.
And then I read plays of Wilde.
Attention! Do not read this book in transport or in public places, where people can think you are high, because, oh boy, you are going to laugh!
Now I want to go to Paris to leave my kiss for this amazing play writer while he sits there and rolls eyes, saying to himself "one more".
And immediately after that I want to go to GB to see all the plays from this collection played by British actors.
July 12, 2020
The Importance of Being Earnest
The humour, the social satire, the banters, simply brilliant! [06.10.2019, 5 stars]
A Florentine Tragedy
Short play with a shocking twist at the end. [11.10.2019, 3 stars]
Salomé
Didn‘t like it that much. Was exhausting to read because of its old traditional language and style. The story itself okay with another twist at the end. (For people who don‘t know the bible that good as myself). [The setting however fitted as I’m on holiday in Cyprus. 12.10.2019, 2 stars]
Lady Windermere's Fan
Nothing is at it seems in this play which masterfully showcases the unfairness of society in relation to gender/women’s rights. Bittersweet and tragic. [13.10.2019, 5 stars]
A Woman of No Importance
Another brilliant play which showcases masterfully the hypocrite society of the time. There were so many brilliant sentences in it. [29-30.10.2019, 4 stars]
“Men marry because they are tired; women because they are curious. Both are disappointed.”
An Ideal Husband
Read last year during Victober. Review [22-24.10.2018, 4 stars]
The humour, the social satire, the banters, simply brilliant! [06.10.2019, 5 stars]
A Florentine Tragedy
Short play with a shocking twist at the end. [11.10.2019, 3 stars]
Salomé
Didn‘t like it that much. Was exhausting to read because of its old traditional language and style. The story itself okay with another twist at the end. (For people who don‘t know the bible that good as myself). [The setting however fitted as I’m on holiday in Cyprus. 12.10.2019, 2 stars]
Lady Windermere's Fan
Nothing is at it seems in this play which masterfully showcases the unfairness of society in relation to gender/women’s rights. Bittersweet and tragic. [13.10.2019, 5 stars]
A Woman of No Importance
Another brilliant play which showcases masterfully the hypocrite society of the time. There were so many brilliant sentences in it. [29-30.10.2019, 4 stars]
“Men marry because they are tired; women because they are curious. Both are disappointed.”
An Ideal Husband
Read last year during Victober. Review [22-24.10.2018, 4 stars]
February 2, 2023
O Leque de Lady Windermere - 5*
Uma Mulher Sem Importância - 4.5*
Um Marido Ideal - 5*
A Importância de Ser Earnest - 5*
Uma Mulher Sem Importância - 4.5*
Um Marido Ideal - 5*
A Importância de Ser Earnest - 5*
August 21, 2024
#NewReviewOfOverallBook
After reading Oscar Wilde's novel, 'The Picture of Dorian Gray', I thought I'll read the plays of Oscar Wilde. I have two editions of his plays, the Bantam edition and the Oxford edition. Most of the plays are repeated in both. So I used the Bantam edition as my main read (probably because it had big font and was easy on the eye, and for some reason I love Bantam editions), and read one play from the Oxford edition which was not there in the Bantam.
There were five plays across the two editions.
🍁 Lady Windermere's Fan
🍁 Salome
🍁 An Ideal Husband
🍁 The Importance of Being Earnest
🍁 A Woman of No Importance
There was also one long poem,
🍁 The Ballad of Reading Gaol
I had read 'The Importance of Being Earnest' before, but all the other plays were new to me.
The plays were all fun to read. The characters were charming, the dialogue was cool and stylish, and Oscar Wilde's famous one-liners were there in every page. There was one main character in every play, who was cool and stylish who spoke most of those charming lines. Most of the times, this main character was a good person, sometimes this main character was a not-so-good person. I discovered that the most famous line by Oscar Wilde, "I can resist everything except temptation", was from 'Lady Windermere's Fan'. His another famous line, "To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness", was from 'The Importance of Being Earnest'. In many of these plays, there is a kind of party or gathering at the beginning, and a new unknown person, usually a woman, turns up, and someone recognizes her, some secrets from the past come tumbling out, and then interesting things happen.
'The Importance of Being Earnest' is very different from the other plays because it is 100% comedy, there are no bad guys there. It made me remember one of the old famous Tamil movies 'Kaadhalikka Neramillai' ('No Time to Love'). It is a famous comedy and it has a legendary status among Tamil film fans. It seems to be very similar to 'The Importance of Being Earnest'. I'm surprised that I didn't notice the similarity before.
Dialogue plays a very important part in all the comic plays and sometimes it overshadows even the story. Peter Raby says this in his introduction to the Oxford edition when he is talking about 'The Importance of Being Earnest' –
"Wilde always began to create his plays from dialogue. Here he succeeds in subjugating plot to dialogue so conclusively that one feels literally anything could happen without affecting his characters' aplomb."
'Salome' was very different from the other four plays. It was originally written in French by Oscar Wilde, and it is about the Jewish princess Salome who wants John the Baptist's head delivered to her on a plate. This play is very serious, there is not even an ounce of comedy in it, and it is a heartbreaking story throughout. I didn't like it much.
'The Ballad of Reading Gaol' is a long poem and inspired by Oscar Wilde's time in prison. It is dark and heartbreaking, but some parts of it are very beautiful. My favourite part from the poem is at the beginning and goes like this –
"Yet each man kills the thing he loves,
By each let this be heard,
Some do it with a bitter look,
Some with a flattering word,
The coward does it with a kiss,
The brave man with a sword!
Some kill their love when they are young,
And some when they are old;
Some strangle with the hands of Lust,
Some with the hands of Gold:
The kindest use a knife, because
The dead so soon grow cold.
Some love too little, some too long,
Some sell, and others buy;
Some do the deed with many tears,
And some without a sigh:
For each man kills the thing he loves,
Yet each man does not die."
There are atleast a couple of more plays that Oscar Wilde wrote at the beginning of his career which have not been included in these two collections. Their stories and style seem to be very different from his more famous plays, and they seem to have not done well commercially when they were performed. One of them, 'The Duchess of Padua', looks very interesting. I want to read that sometime.
There were beautiful introductions in both the editions I had, by Richard Ellmann (in the Bantam edition) and Peter Raby (in the Oxford edition). I loved Richard Ellmann's introduction more, because his tone was conversational and it was like speaking to a friend, but both the introductions were excellent.
I enjoyed reading Oscar Wilde's plays. It was 355 pages of pure pleasure 😊 If you haven't read them, I'd highly recommend them. Hope I can watch these plays performed at the theatre sometime. It will be fun, I think.
Have you read Oscar Wilde's plays? Which of his plays is your favourite? Which is your favourite Oscar Wilde quote? Have you seen performances of any of his plays?
**********
#OldReviewOfTheImportanceOfBeingEarnest
I haven’t read a play in a while – I think the last play I read was ‘Homecoming’ by Harold Pinter a few years back. So, I decided to read a few plays this year. The first one I got hold of was ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ by Oscar Wilde. I have always admired Oscar Wilde’s wit and humour and so I was really looking forward to reading his most famous play. I finished reading it a couple of days back. Here is what I think.
What I think
‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ is about two friends John Worthing and Algernon Moncrieff. Worthing loves Moncrieff’s cousin Gwendolen, and proposes to her and she accepts it. But Gwendolen’s mother Lady Bracknell refuses to approve their match, because John was adopted and doesn’t know anything about his biological parents. Algernon falls in love with John’s ward Cecily and proposes to her and she accepts it. Lady Bracknell has a problem with that too, till she discovers that Cecily has good investments in her name. But there is a catch in all this. John calls himself Ernest Worthing when he comes to the city. Gwendolen knows him as Ernest. John also tells his ward Cecily that he has a brother called Ernest in the city who is not a good guy and who is whiling away his time. Algernon, when he meets Cecily for the first time, takes advantage of the situation and introduces himself as Ernest Worthing. So Cecily thinks that he is Ernest. Then comes a situation when John, Earnest, Gwendolen and Cecily all end up in John’s home in the countryside, and both Gwendolen and Cecily think that they are engaged to Ernest. This leads to some funny situations and when the truth is finally revealed, that neither John nor Algernon is Ernest, Gwendolen asks John :
“Where is your brother Ernest? We are both engaged to be married to your brother Ernest, so it is a matter of some importance to us to know where you brother Ernest is at present.”
John replies :
“I will tell you quite frankly that I have no brother Ernest. I have no brother at all. I never had a brother in my life, and I certainly have not the smallest intention of ever having one in the future.”
On hearing this, Gwendolen tells Cecily :
“I am afraid it is quite clear, Cecily, that neither of us is engaged to be married to anyone.”
Gwendolen and Cecily walk off into the house after this conversation. Do John and Algernon manage to win back the trust of Gwendolen and Cecily? What does Lady Bracknell say to all this subterfuge? What happens in the end? The answer to all these form the rest of the story.
I enjoyed reading ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’. It made me some of old Hollywood / Bollywood / Tamil movies that I have seen, which had similar plots. It looks like Oscar Wilde inspired many filmmakers. I loved the way ‘earnest’ is interpreted in different ways throughout the play taking on multiple meanings. I was also surprised to discover that Oscar Wilde was Irish. I didn’t know that before.
The play had many of my favourite Oscar Wilde lines, like these.
“it is absurd to have a hard and fast rule about what one should read and what one shouldn’t. More than half of modern culture depends on what one shouldn’t read.”
“That, my dear Algy, is the whole truth pure and simple.”
“The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Modern life would be very tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete impossibility.”
“All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does. That’s his.”
“I am sick to death of cleverness. Everybody is clever nowadays. You can’t go anywhere without meeting clever people. The thing has become an absolute public nuisance. I wish to goodness we had a few fools left.”
“I never travel without my diary. One should always have something sensational to read in the train.”
Cecily : That certainly seems a satisfactory explanation, does it not?
Gwendolen : Yes, dear, if you can believe him.
Cecily : I don’t. But that does not affect the wonderful beauty of his answer.
Gwendolen : True. In matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity, is the vital thing.
Lady Bracknell : Is this Miss Prism a female of repellent aspect, remotely connected with education?
Chasuble : She is the most cultivated of ladies, and the very picture of respectability.
Lady Bracknell : It is obviously the same person.
One of my favourite Oscar Wilde lines was not there in the play – or rather it was there in its original form, which in my opinion, didn’t have the same effect. The notes to the play said that this line was modified later. The modified line, which I like, goes like this:
To lose one parent, Mr.Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness.
Algernon has a manservant called Lane, who is smart and intelligent, and who reminded me of Jeeves from the P.G.Wodehouse books. Here is one scene which I liked.
Algernon : I hope tomorrow will be a fine day, Lane.
Lane : It never is, sir.
Algernon : Lane, you’re a perfect pessimist.
Lane : I do my best to give satisfaction, sir.
I have seen a movie version of the play, which had Colin Firth, Rupert Everett, Frances O’Connor, Reese Witherspoon and Judi Dench. I remember the movie having a twist-in-the-tail kind of surprising ending, which the play didn’t have. I liked the movie but now after reading the play, I want to watch it again. I also have a movie version starring Michael Redgrave, Edith Evans and others, and I want to watch that too.
There are also four other Oscar Wilde plays in the collection I have. I want to read them next.
Have you read ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ or seen it performed or seen a movie version? What do you think about it?
After reading Oscar Wilde's novel, 'The Picture of Dorian Gray', I thought I'll read the plays of Oscar Wilde. I have two editions of his plays, the Bantam edition and the Oxford edition. Most of the plays are repeated in both. So I used the Bantam edition as my main read (probably because it had big font and was easy on the eye, and for some reason I love Bantam editions), and read one play from the Oxford edition which was not there in the Bantam.
There were five plays across the two editions.
🍁 Lady Windermere's Fan
🍁 Salome
🍁 An Ideal Husband
🍁 The Importance of Being Earnest
🍁 A Woman of No Importance
There was also one long poem,
🍁 The Ballad of Reading Gaol
I had read 'The Importance of Being Earnest' before, but all the other plays were new to me.
The plays were all fun to read. The characters were charming, the dialogue was cool and stylish, and Oscar Wilde's famous one-liners were there in every page. There was one main character in every play, who was cool and stylish who spoke most of those charming lines. Most of the times, this main character was a good person, sometimes this main character was a not-so-good person. I discovered that the most famous line by Oscar Wilde, "I can resist everything except temptation", was from 'Lady Windermere's Fan'. His another famous line, "To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness", was from 'The Importance of Being Earnest'. In many of these plays, there is a kind of party or gathering at the beginning, and a new unknown person, usually a woman, turns up, and someone recognizes her, some secrets from the past come tumbling out, and then interesting things happen.
'The Importance of Being Earnest' is very different from the other plays because it is 100% comedy, there are no bad guys there. It made me remember one of the old famous Tamil movies 'Kaadhalikka Neramillai' ('No Time to Love'). It is a famous comedy and it has a legendary status among Tamil film fans. It seems to be very similar to 'The Importance of Being Earnest'. I'm surprised that I didn't notice the similarity before.
Dialogue plays a very important part in all the comic plays and sometimes it overshadows even the story. Peter Raby says this in his introduction to the Oxford edition when he is talking about 'The Importance of Being Earnest' –
"Wilde always began to create his plays from dialogue. Here he succeeds in subjugating plot to dialogue so conclusively that one feels literally anything could happen without affecting his characters' aplomb."
'Salome' was very different from the other four plays. It was originally written in French by Oscar Wilde, and it is about the Jewish princess Salome who wants John the Baptist's head delivered to her on a plate. This play is very serious, there is not even an ounce of comedy in it, and it is a heartbreaking story throughout. I didn't like it much.
'The Ballad of Reading Gaol' is a long poem and inspired by Oscar Wilde's time in prison. It is dark and heartbreaking, but some parts of it are very beautiful. My favourite part from the poem is at the beginning and goes like this –
"Yet each man kills the thing he loves,
By each let this be heard,
Some do it with a bitter look,
Some with a flattering word,
The coward does it with a kiss,
The brave man with a sword!
Some kill their love when they are young,
And some when they are old;
Some strangle with the hands of Lust,
Some with the hands of Gold:
The kindest use a knife, because
The dead so soon grow cold.
Some love too little, some too long,
Some sell, and others buy;
Some do the deed with many tears,
And some without a sigh:
For each man kills the thing he loves,
Yet each man does not die."
There are atleast a couple of more plays that Oscar Wilde wrote at the beginning of his career which have not been included in these two collections. Their stories and style seem to be very different from his more famous plays, and they seem to have not done well commercially when they were performed. One of them, 'The Duchess of Padua', looks very interesting. I want to read that sometime.
There were beautiful introductions in both the editions I had, by Richard Ellmann (in the Bantam edition) and Peter Raby (in the Oxford edition). I loved Richard Ellmann's introduction more, because his tone was conversational and it was like speaking to a friend, but both the introductions were excellent.
I enjoyed reading Oscar Wilde's plays. It was 355 pages of pure pleasure 😊 If you haven't read them, I'd highly recommend them. Hope I can watch these plays performed at the theatre sometime. It will be fun, I think.
Have you read Oscar Wilde's plays? Which of his plays is your favourite? Which is your favourite Oscar Wilde quote? Have you seen performances of any of his plays?
**********
#OldReviewOfTheImportanceOfBeingEarnest
I haven’t read a play in a while – I think the last play I read was ‘Homecoming’ by Harold Pinter a few years back. So, I decided to read a few plays this year. The first one I got hold of was ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ by Oscar Wilde. I have always admired Oscar Wilde’s wit and humour and so I was really looking forward to reading his most famous play. I finished reading it a couple of days back. Here is what I think.
What I think
‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ is about two friends John Worthing and Algernon Moncrieff. Worthing loves Moncrieff’s cousin Gwendolen, and proposes to her and she accepts it. But Gwendolen’s mother Lady Bracknell refuses to approve their match, because John was adopted and doesn’t know anything about his biological parents. Algernon falls in love with John’s ward Cecily and proposes to her and she accepts it. Lady Bracknell has a problem with that too, till she discovers that Cecily has good investments in her name. But there is a catch in all this. John calls himself Ernest Worthing when he comes to the city. Gwendolen knows him as Ernest. John also tells his ward Cecily that he has a brother called Ernest in the city who is not a good guy and who is whiling away his time. Algernon, when he meets Cecily for the first time, takes advantage of the situation and introduces himself as Ernest Worthing. So Cecily thinks that he is Ernest. Then comes a situation when John, Earnest, Gwendolen and Cecily all end up in John’s home in the countryside, and both Gwendolen and Cecily think that they are engaged to Ernest. This leads to some funny situations and when the truth is finally revealed, that neither John nor Algernon is Ernest, Gwendolen asks John :
“Where is your brother Ernest? We are both engaged to be married to your brother Ernest, so it is a matter of some importance to us to know where you brother Ernest is at present.”
John replies :
“I will tell you quite frankly that I have no brother Ernest. I have no brother at all. I never had a brother in my life, and I certainly have not the smallest intention of ever having one in the future.”
On hearing this, Gwendolen tells Cecily :
“I am afraid it is quite clear, Cecily, that neither of us is engaged to be married to anyone.”
Gwendolen and Cecily walk off into the house after this conversation. Do John and Algernon manage to win back the trust of Gwendolen and Cecily? What does Lady Bracknell say to all this subterfuge? What happens in the end? The answer to all these form the rest of the story.
I enjoyed reading ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’. It made me some of old Hollywood / Bollywood / Tamil movies that I have seen, which had similar plots. It looks like Oscar Wilde inspired many filmmakers. I loved the way ‘earnest’ is interpreted in different ways throughout the play taking on multiple meanings. I was also surprised to discover that Oscar Wilde was Irish. I didn’t know that before.
The play had many of my favourite Oscar Wilde lines, like these.
“it is absurd to have a hard and fast rule about what one should read and what one shouldn’t. More than half of modern culture depends on what one shouldn’t read.”
“That, my dear Algy, is the whole truth pure and simple.”
“The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Modern life would be very tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete impossibility.”
“All women become like their mothers. That is their tragedy. No man does. That’s his.”
“I am sick to death of cleverness. Everybody is clever nowadays. You can’t go anywhere without meeting clever people. The thing has become an absolute public nuisance. I wish to goodness we had a few fools left.”
“I never travel without my diary. One should always have something sensational to read in the train.”
Cecily : That certainly seems a satisfactory explanation, does it not?
Gwendolen : Yes, dear, if you can believe him.
Cecily : I don’t. But that does not affect the wonderful beauty of his answer.
Gwendolen : True. In matters of grave importance, style, not sincerity, is the vital thing.
Lady Bracknell : Is this Miss Prism a female of repellent aspect, remotely connected with education?
Chasuble : She is the most cultivated of ladies, and the very picture of respectability.
Lady Bracknell : It is obviously the same person.
One of my favourite Oscar Wilde lines was not there in the play – or rather it was there in its original form, which in my opinion, didn’t have the same effect. The notes to the play said that this line was modified later. The modified line, which I like, goes like this:
To lose one parent, Mr.Worthing, may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness.
Algernon has a manservant called Lane, who is smart and intelligent, and who reminded me of Jeeves from the P.G.Wodehouse books. Here is one scene which I liked.
Algernon : I hope tomorrow will be a fine day, Lane.
Lane : It never is, sir.
Algernon : Lane, you’re a perfect pessimist.
Lane : I do my best to give satisfaction, sir.
I have seen a movie version of the play, which had Colin Firth, Rupert Everett, Frances O’Connor, Reese Witherspoon and Judi Dench. I remember the movie having a twist-in-the-tail kind of surprising ending, which the play didn’t have. I liked the movie but now after reading the play, I want to watch it again. I also have a movie version starring Michael Redgrave, Edith Evans and others, and I want to watch that too.
There are also four other Oscar Wilde plays in the collection I have. I want to read them next.
Have you read ‘The Importance of Being Earnest’ or seen it performed or seen a movie version? What do you think about it?
April 16, 2014
The Importance of Being Earnest and Lady Windermere's Fan are fun and light reads, they made me smile and laugh out loud, and they were entertaining. I wish there was a little depth to Earnest, especially regarding the ending. It seemed trivial, and I know that it's a satire, but I couldn't get past the easily-fixed Shakespearean resolution.
Salome, on the other hand, was a different read from Wilde. I've read Dorian Gray, short stories, plays, and essays, and Salome falls more in line with the novel and the essays for me. I enjoyed the tone and the language, especially Herod's descriptions of his jewels and other wealth.
Overall, I'm a Wilde fan, and I appreciate the different aspects that his writing takes on. My favorite is when he's serious, though, or at least blending comedy with a darker side. I think it showcases his true skill much better.
Salome, on the other hand, was a different read from Wilde. I've read Dorian Gray, short stories, plays, and essays, and Salome falls more in line with the novel and the essays for me. I enjoyed the tone and the language, especially Herod's descriptions of his jewels and other wealth.
Overall, I'm a Wilde fan, and I appreciate the different aspects that his writing takes on. My favorite is when he's serious, though, or at least blending comedy with a darker side. I think it showcases his true skill much better.
June 14, 2012
Oscar Wilde is such joyous fun! He makes us look at ourselves in the most ironic and funny ways. Certainly he was a master of satire and in this play, he has presented the characters in what I have come to think of as the stiff British way. I loved that is poked a great deal of fun at the staid Victorian period. Mr Wilde himself was certainly everything else but staid and perhaps in thinking of him, we see a man born before his time.
The play on the words "Earnest" is fun and yet its does point to the hypocrisy of the time. Men say silly things, woman fall in love with illusions, and the whole thing becomes a farce, is clearly seen throughout this hysterical story which makes the reader oftentimes lol. Short and to the point, this play must have ruffled a few Victorian feathers as I am sure that was the intent. Earnestness was the avenue to reform at the time and to make the poorer class better. Oscar takes this word and has his way with it and ultimately makes this satirical piece flick its nose at the staid and proper British mores of Victorian times.
The play on the words "Earnest" is fun and yet its does point to the hypocrisy of the time. Men say silly things, woman fall in love with illusions, and the whole thing becomes a farce, is clearly seen throughout this hysterical story which makes the reader oftentimes lol. Short and to the point, this play must have ruffled a few Victorian feathers as I am sure that was the intent. Earnestness was the avenue to reform at the time and to make the poorer class better. Oscar takes this word and has his way with it and ultimately makes this satirical piece flick its nose at the staid and proper British mores of Victorian times.
August 23, 2022
3.5/5
September 18, 2022
The horror of Oscar Wilde is both poetic and imaginative. Wilde’s aesthetic philosophy explores life as a tragedy and celebration; an “apostle of beauty” that is intelligent in the way it conveys human emotion and ruinously decadent in the way it conveys the unflinching morality of his characters.
Here lies the significance of Oscar Wilde’s plays: to dissect the irony and cynicism of the grayness of human existence, the gaping holes they create. The domestic spaces of his imagination are great imitators of the interior lives of some of his characters.
Anything Wilde expresses, no matter how momentary, is never a coincidence because it aligns and reveals, to the reader, Wilde’s unruffled ideas about life, marriage, individuality, ambition, love, etc.
His method of injecting both soul and spirit into his characters, both major and minor, is unlike anything I’ve read. In both their expressions and idiosyncrasies, Wilde manages to convey the squeamish discomfort of vanity, narcissism, and the superficiality of human nature which are so deeply rooted in our fear of and growing obsession with art and beauty.
There is a lot to unearth in Oscar Wilde’s plays; they are morbidly flawed while also embodying the beauty and ruggedness of human imperfection.
You’re enveloped by the pathos of the human condition from one play to another only to realize that it is in the bittersweet personalities of Wilde that you sense your ephemeral spirit of life, its fragility and disrepair when weighed against the indifference of the world.
I recommend The Importance of Being Earnest & A Woman of No Importance before everything else.
Here lies the significance of Oscar Wilde’s plays: to dissect the irony and cynicism of the grayness of human existence, the gaping holes they create. The domestic spaces of his imagination are great imitators of the interior lives of some of his characters.
Anything Wilde expresses, no matter how momentary, is never a coincidence because it aligns and reveals, to the reader, Wilde’s unruffled ideas about life, marriage, individuality, ambition, love, etc.
His method of injecting both soul and spirit into his characters, both major and minor, is unlike anything I’ve read. In both their expressions and idiosyncrasies, Wilde manages to convey the squeamish discomfort of vanity, narcissism, and the superficiality of human nature which are so deeply rooted in our fear of and growing obsession with art and beauty.
There is a lot to unearth in Oscar Wilde’s plays; they are morbidly flawed while also embodying the beauty and ruggedness of human imperfection.
You’re enveloped by the pathos of the human condition from one play to another only to realize that it is in the bittersweet personalities of Wilde that you sense your ephemeral spirit of life, its fragility and disrepair when weighed against the indifference of the world.
I recommend The Importance of Being Earnest & A Woman of No Importance before everything else.
March 4, 2020
what can i SAY. this is Oscar Wilde. of course this was GREAT
did not read A Woman of No Importance but i definitely shall. the rest were a fucking delight in their own unique way, but my favourite has gotta be The Importance of Being Earnest. i mean, the pun alone deserves all the love and praise.
in conclusion, sir Wilde sure was a fucking bastard, but he definitely knew what he was doing. cheers.
did not read A Woman of No Importance but i definitely shall. the rest were a fucking delight in their own unique way, but my favourite has gotta be The Importance of Being Earnest. i mean, the pun alone deserves all the love and praise.
in conclusion, sir Wilde sure was a fucking bastard, but he definitely knew what he was doing. cheers.
November 26, 2023
Oscar Wilde's wit was legendary. There is good reason for that. These three plays alone would suffice to demonstrate the point. Consistently laugh out loud funny along with biting social satire. A great combination when done well and no one has done it better than Wilde.
March 26, 2012
Lady Windermere’s Fan: "Do you want answers?" "I think I'm entitled to it." "You want answers?" "I want the truth!" "You can’t handle the truth!" Switch and repeat.
Salome: "They'll love it in Pomona." Mishima directed it in Japan!
A Woman of No Importance: A bit preachy and hysterical.
An Ideal Husband: "Do you want answers?" "I think I'm entitled to it." "You want answers?" "I want the truth!" "You can’t handle the truth! Oh, wait. It seems that you can." Switch and repeat.
A Florentine Tragedy: It's a bit "O, Love-bourne ecstasy that is Mrs Miggins, wilt thou bring me but one cup of the browned juicings of that naughty bean we call 'coffee', ere I die...". Yawn.
The Importance of Being Earnest: Hurrah!
Salome: "They'll love it in Pomona." Mishima directed it in Japan!
A Woman of No Importance: A bit preachy and hysterical.
An Ideal Husband: "Do you want answers?" "I think I'm entitled to it." "You want answers?" "I want the truth!" "You can’t handle the truth! Oh, wait. It seems that you can." Switch and repeat.
A Florentine Tragedy: It's a bit "O, Love-bourne ecstasy that is Mrs Miggins, wilt thou bring me but one cup of the browned juicings of that naughty bean we call 'coffee', ere I die...". Yawn.
The Importance of Being Earnest: Hurrah!
May 22, 2025
"It is not the perfect, but the imperfect, who have need of love. It is when we are wounded by our own hands, or by the hands of others, that love should come to cure us - else what use is love at all?"
There is no doubt that Oscar Wilde is one of the wittiest literary geniuses. His mastery of the language, and his sharp observations about human behaviour always guarantee a meaningful experience.
I am glad I read the title play last because it made me laugh and left a pleasant aftertaste. The other plays felt like they were seeking but not always finding depth, with dialogue which partly made me lose interest. Maybe it is advisable to take longer breaks between the plays, rather than trying to read them as one book.
Whether you enjoy the structure of a play or not, Wilde's works are always worth reading, if only for the timeless aphorisms we should all know so well!
"Men always want to be a woman's first love. That is their clumsy vanity. We women have a more subtle instinct about things. What we like is to be a man's last romance."
"Children begin by loving their parents. After a time they judge them. Rarely, if ever, do they forgive them."
"When a man is old enough to do wrong he should be old enough to do right also."
"Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people we personally dislike."
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Modern life would be very tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete impossibility!"
There is no doubt that Oscar Wilde is one of the wittiest literary geniuses. His mastery of the language, and his sharp observations about human behaviour always guarantee a meaningful experience.
I am glad I read the title play last because it made me laugh and left a pleasant aftertaste. The other plays felt like they were seeking but not always finding depth, with dialogue which partly made me lose interest. Maybe it is advisable to take longer breaks between the plays, rather than trying to read them as one book.
Whether you enjoy the structure of a play or not, Wilde's works are always worth reading, if only for the timeless aphorisms we should all know so well!
"Men always want to be a woman's first love. That is their clumsy vanity. We women have a more subtle instinct about things. What we like is to be a man's last romance."
"Children begin by loving their parents. After a time they judge them. Rarely, if ever, do they forgive them."
"When a man is old enough to do wrong he should be old enough to do right also."
"Morality is simply the attitude we adopt towards people we personally dislike."
"The truth is rarely pure and never simple. Modern life would be very tedious if it were either, and modern literature a complete impossibility!"
December 25, 2020
Η συγκεκριμένη έκδοση περιείχε τα θεατρικά Σαλώμη, Η βεντάλια της Λαιδης Ουίντερμιρ και Η Σημασία του να είναι κανείς σοβαρός. Ο πρόλογος και το επίμετρο ιδιαιτέρως κατατοπιστικά για το ιστορικό πλαίσιο κατά την συγγραφή των έργων. Η Σαλώμη είναι ένα λυρικά γραμμένο δραματικό μονόπρακτο, όπου η ερωτική επιθυμία καταστρέφει τους τους πρωταγωνιστές. Η βεντάλια της Λαιδης Ουίντερμιρ είναι σαφώς πιο ανάλαφρο, αλλά δεν φτάνει στα άκρα της κοινωνικής κριτικής. Η κυρία Ερλυν δεν θα μπορέσει να επιστρέψει στην Κοινωνία θριαμβευτικά και η αλήθεια δεν θα έρθει στην επιφάνεια.
Η σημασία του να είναι κανείς σοβαρός είναι φαρσικό σατιρικό κωμικό έργο, όπου η εξαπάτηση πρωταγωνιστεί και κλείνει το μάτι ακόμα και στο φινάλε του έργου. Πολλές από τις γνωστές ατάκες του Wilde προέρχονται από τα δύο τελευταία έργα. Συνολικά τα βρήκα ενδιαφέροντα έργα ανά σημεία, τα δύο τελευταία πολύ αστεία και πνευματώδη (ιδίως το τελευταίο), αλλά ίσως η κοινωνική κριτική είναι ελαφρώς επιδερμική.
Η σημασία του να είναι κανείς σοβαρός είναι φαρσικό σατιρικό κωμικό έργο, όπου η εξαπάτηση πρωταγωνιστεί και κλείνει το μάτι ακόμα και στο φινάλε του έργου. Πολλές από τις γνωστές ατάκες του Wilde προέρχονται από τα δύο τελευταία έργα. Συνολικά τα βρήκα ενδιαφέροντα έργα ανά σημεία, τα δύο τελευταία πολύ αστεία και πνευματώδη (ιδίως το τελευταίο), αλλά ίσως η κοινωνική κριτική είναι ελαφρώς επιδερμική.
July 24, 2018
4.5.
Was pleasantly surprised to find that I enjoyed all three of these stories!
Was pleasantly surprised to find that I enjoyed all three of these stories!
March 27, 2022
CW: Tierleid, Erwähnung des N-Wortes
3,5 Sterne!
Ich mochte diese Sammlung sehr gerne, habe aber gemerkt, dass mir die Märchen von Oscar Wilde im Schnitt viel besser gefallen, als seine Erzählungen. In seinen Kurzgeschichten verliert er sich oft in Ausschweifungen. Trotzdem habe ich dieses Buch sehr genossen.
Bewertung der einzelnen Texte:
Der glückliche Prinz | 5*
Die Nachtigall und die Rose | 4*
Der selbstsüchtige Riese | 3,5*
Der treue Freund | 4,5*
Die besondere Rakete | 3*
Der junge König | 3,5*
Der Geburtstag der Infantin | 4*
Der Fischer und seine Seele | 3,5*
Das Sternenkind | 4,5*
Lord Arthur Saviles Verbrechen | 4*
Das Gespenst von Canterville | nicht beendet
Die Sphinx ohne Geheimnis | 2,5*
Der Modellmillionär | 4*
Das Bildnis des Herrn W.H. | nicht beendet
(Den Prosatexten würde ich kollektiv 3 Sterne geben)
3,5 Sterne!
Ich mochte diese Sammlung sehr gerne, habe aber gemerkt, dass mir die Märchen von Oscar Wilde im Schnitt viel besser gefallen, als seine Erzählungen. In seinen Kurzgeschichten verliert er sich oft in Ausschweifungen. Trotzdem habe ich dieses Buch sehr genossen.
Bewertung der einzelnen Texte:
Der glückliche Prinz | 5*
Die Nachtigall und die Rose | 4*
Der selbstsüchtige Riese | 3,5*
Der treue Freund | 4,5*
Die besondere Rakete | 3*
Der junge König | 3,5*
Der Geburtstag der Infantin | 4*
Der Fischer und seine Seele | 3,5*
Das Sternenkind | 4,5*
Lord Arthur Saviles Verbrechen | 4*
Das Gespenst von Canterville | nicht beendet
Die Sphinx ohne Geheimnis | 2,5*
Der Modellmillionär | 4*
Das Bildnis des Herrn W.H. | nicht beendet
(Den Prosatexten würde ich kollektiv 3 Sterne geben)
May 26, 2018
I really enjoyed the title play. Wilde likes to make fun of the upper class, showing them as rather silly. I especially liked the two butlers. Algernon's man Lane had the perfect response for everything, coming to his master's rescue more than once. I think he might have been the smartest character in the play.
I didn't like the other plays as much. I had a hard time distinguishing Lady A, Duchess B, Mrs. C and Colonel D in some of them. It probably works better to see the plays performed rather than to read them so the characters are more distinct.
I didn't like the other plays as much. I had a hard time distinguishing Lady A, Duchess B, Mrs. C and Colonel D in some of them. It probably works better to see the plays performed rather than to read them so the characters are more distinct.
May 25, 2021
No one I have ever read is as funny as Wilde. In many places he came forth as an extremely bold and caustic version of Jane Austen in terms of how he uses his wit to lampoon the British elite.
An Ideal Husband has some very toxic patriarchal ideas about women, but they are part and parcel of the times of which he was writing.
An Ideal Husband has some very toxic patriarchal ideas about women, but they are part and parcel of the times of which he was writing.
November 21, 2015
I am glad that sir Oscar lived up to his reputation
June 7, 2023
when i’m in a silliest competition but my opponent is oscar wilde
Displaying 1 - 30 of 1,008 reviews